Comparison of hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, and standard of care in critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: an opportunistic retrospective analysis.


Journal

Critical care (London, England)
ISSN: 1466-609X
Titre abrégé: Crit Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9801902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 07 2020
Historique:
received: 14 05 2020
accepted: 29 06 2020
entrez: 13 7 2020
pubmed: 13 7 2020
medline: 16 7 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak is spreading worldwide. To date, no specific treatment has convincingly demonstrated its efficacy. Hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir/ritonavir have potential interest, but virological and clinical data are scarce, especially in critically ill patients. The present report took the opportunity of compassionate use and successive drug shortages to compare the effects of two therapeutic options, lopinavir/ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine, as compared to standard of care only. The primary outcomes were treatment escalation (intubation, extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation support, or renal replacement therapy) after day 1 until day 28. Secondary outcomes included ventilator-free days at day 28, mortality at day 14 and day 28, treatment safety issues and changes in respiratory tracts, and plasma viral load (as estimated by cycle threshold value) between admission and day 7. Eighty patients were treated during a 4-week period and included in the analysis: 22 (28%) received standard of care only, 20 (25%) patients received lopinavir/ritonavir associated to standard of care, and 38 (47%) patients received hydroxychloroquine and standard of care. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the 3 groups. Treatment escalation occurred in 9 (41%), 10 (50%), and 15 (39%) patients who received standard of care only, standard of care and lopinavir/ritonavir, and standard of care and hydroxychloroquine, respectively (p = 0.567). There was no significant difference between groups regarding the number of ventilator-free days at day 28 and mortality at day 14 and day 28. Finally, there was no significant change between groups in viral respiratory or plasma load between admission and day 7. In critically ill patients admitted for SARS-CoV-2-related pneumonia, no difference was found between hydroxychloroquine or lopinavir/ritonavir as compared to standard of care only on the proportion of patients who needed treatment escalation at day 28. Further randomized controlled trials are required to demonstrate whether these drugs may be useful in this context.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak is spreading worldwide. To date, no specific treatment has convincingly demonstrated its efficacy. Hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir/ritonavir have potential interest, but virological and clinical data are scarce, especially in critically ill patients.
METHODS
The present report took the opportunity of compassionate use and successive drug shortages to compare the effects of two therapeutic options, lopinavir/ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine, as compared to standard of care only. The primary outcomes were treatment escalation (intubation, extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation support, or renal replacement therapy) after day 1 until day 28. Secondary outcomes included ventilator-free days at day 28, mortality at day 14 and day 28, treatment safety issues and changes in respiratory tracts, and plasma viral load (as estimated by cycle threshold value) between admission and day 7.
RESULTS
Eighty patients were treated during a 4-week period and included in the analysis: 22 (28%) received standard of care only, 20 (25%) patients received lopinavir/ritonavir associated to standard of care, and 38 (47%) patients received hydroxychloroquine and standard of care. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the 3 groups. Treatment escalation occurred in 9 (41%), 10 (50%), and 15 (39%) patients who received standard of care only, standard of care and lopinavir/ritonavir, and standard of care and hydroxychloroquine, respectively (p = 0.567). There was no significant difference between groups regarding the number of ventilator-free days at day 28 and mortality at day 14 and day 28. Finally, there was no significant change between groups in viral respiratory or plasma load between admission and day 7.
CONCLUSION
In critically ill patients admitted for SARS-CoV-2-related pneumonia, no difference was found between hydroxychloroquine or lopinavir/ritonavir as compared to standard of care only on the proportion of patients who needed treatment escalation at day 28. Further randomized controlled trials are required to demonstrate whether these drugs may be useful in this context.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32653015
doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03117-9
pii: 10.1186/s13054-020-03117-9
pmc: PMC7351645
doi:

Substances chimiques

Drug Combinations 0
Lopinavir 2494G1JF75
Hydroxychloroquine 4QWG6N8QKH
Ritonavir O3J8G9O825

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

418

Références

Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):854-887
pubmed: 32222812
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan;25(3):
pubmed: 31992387
Cell Res. 2020 Mar;30(3):269-271
pubmed: 32020029
BMJ. 2007 Oct 20;335(7624):806-8
pubmed: 17947786
Thorax. 2004 Mar;59(3):252-6
pubmed: 14985565
Curr Pharm Des. 2004;10(21):2643-8
pubmed: 15320751
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 18;382(25):2411-2418
pubmed: 32379955
Lancet. 2020 Jun 6;395(10239):1763-1770
pubmed: 32442528
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 May;8(5):475-481
pubmed: 32105632
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Jul;56(1):105949
pubmed: 32205204
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 7;382(19):1787-1799
pubmed: 32187464
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Jun;8(6):539-541
pubmed: 32304640
Antiviral Res. 2020 May;177:104762
pubmed: 32147496
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1708-1720
pubmed: 32109013
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1824-1836
pubmed: 32282022
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jul 1;180(7):934-943
pubmed: 32167524
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004 Oct 8;323(1):264-8
pubmed: 15351731
Viruses. 2018 May 17;10(5):
pubmed: 29772762
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2012-2022
pubmed: 32227758
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun 1;201(11):1430-1434
pubmed: 32267160
Circulation. 2020 Jul 21;142(3):303-305
pubmed: 32442023

Auteurs

Marie Lecronier (M)

AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Pneumologie, Médecine intensive - Réanimation (Département "R3S"), Paris, France. marie.lecronier@aphp.fr.

Alexandra Beurton (A)

AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Pneumologie, Médecine intensive - Réanimation (Département "R3S"), Paris, France.
Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMR_S 1158 Neurophysiologie respiratoire expérimentale et clinique, Paris, France.

Sonia Burrel (S)

Sorbonne Université, INSERM UMR S 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Team 3 THERAVIR, Paris, France.
AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Virologie, Centre National de Référence Herpès virus, Paris, France.

Luc Haudebourg (L)

AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Pneumologie, Médecine intensive - Réanimation (Département "R3S"), Paris, France.

Robin Deleris (R)

AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Pneumologie, Médecine intensive - Réanimation (Département "R3S"), Paris, France.

Julien Le Marec (J)

AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Pneumologie, Médecine intensive - Réanimation (Département "R3S"), Paris, France.

Sara Virolle (S)

AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Pneumologie, Médecine intensive - Réanimation (Département "R3S"), Paris, France.

Safaa Nemlaghi (S)

AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Pneumologie, Médecine intensive - Réanimation (Département "R3S"), Paris, France.

Côme Bureau (C)

AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Pneumologie, Médecine intensive - Réanimation (Département "R3S"), Paris, France.
Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMR_S 1158 Neurophysiologie respiratoire expérimentale et clinique, Paris, France.

Pierre Mora (P)

AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Pneumologie, Médecine intensive - Réanimation (Département "R3S"), Paris, France.

Martin De Sarcus (M)

AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département d'anesthésie réanimation, Paris, France.

Olivier Clovet (O)

AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département d'anesthésie réanimation, Paris, France.

Baptiste Duceau (B)

AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département d'anesthésie réanimation, Paris, France.

Paul Henri Grisot (PH)

AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département d'anesthésie réanimation, Paris, France.

Marie Hélène Pari (MH)

AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département d'anesthésie réanimation, Paris, France.

Jérémy Arzoine (J)

AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département d'anesthésie réanimation, Paris, France.

Ulrich Clarac (U)

AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département d'anesthésie réanimation, Paris, France.

David Boutolleau (D)

Sorbonne Université, INSERM UMR S 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Team 3 THERAVIR, Paris, France.
AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Virologie, Centre National de Référence Herpès virus, Paris, France.

Mathieu Raux (M)

Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMR_S 1158 Neurophysiologie respiratoire expérimentale et clinique, Paris, France.
AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département d'anesthésie réanimation, Paris, France.

Julie Delemazure (J)

AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Pneumologie, Médecine intensive - Réanimation (Département "R3S"), Paris, France.

Morgane Faure (M)

AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Pneumologie, Médecine intensive - Réanimation (Département "R3S"), Paris, France.

Maxens Decavele (M)

AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Pneumologie, Médecine intensive - Réanimation (Département "R3S"), Paris, France.
Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMR_S 1158 Neurophysiologie respiratoire expérimentale et clinique, Paris, France.

Elise Morawiec (E)

AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Pneumologie, Médecine intensive - Réanimation (Département "R3S"), Paris, France.

Julien Mayaux (J)

AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Pneumologie, Médecine intensive - Réanimation (Département "R3S"), Paris, France.

Alexandre Demoule (A)

AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Pneumologie, Médecine intensive - Réanimation (Département "R3S"), Paris, France.
Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMR_S 1158 Neurophysiologie respiratoire expérimentale et clinique, Paris, France.

Martin Dres (M)

AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Pneumologie, Médecine intensive - Réanimation (Département "R3S"), Paris, France. martin.dres@aphp.fr.
Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMR_S 1158 Neurophysiologie respiratoire expérimentale et clinique, Paris, France. martin.dres@aphp.fr.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH