"I Am a Total…Loser" - The Role of Interpretation Biases in Youth Depression.
Ambiguous scenarios task
Children and adolescents
Familial risk for depression
Interpretation bias
Major depression
Scrambled sentences task
Journal
Journal of abnormal child psychology
ISSN: 1573-2835
Titre abrégé: J Abnorm Child Psychol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0364547
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
13
7
2020
medline:
25
2
2023
entrez:
13
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Negative interpretation biases have been found to characterize adults with depression and to be involved in the development and maintenance of the disorder. However, less is known about their role in youth depression. The present study investigated i) whether negative interpretation biases characterize children and adolescents with depression and ii) to what extent these biases are more pronounced in currently depressed youth compared to youth at risk for depression (as some negative interpretation biases have been found already in high-risk youth before disorder onset). After a negative mood induction interpretation biases were assessed with two experimental tasks: Ambiguous Scenarios Task (AST) and Scrambled Sentences Task (SST) in three groups of 9-14-year-olds: children and adolescents with a diagnosis of major depression (n = 32), children and adolescents with a high risk for depression (children of depressed parents; n = 48), as well as low-risk children and adolescents (n = 42). Depressed youth exhibited substantially more negative interpretation biases than both high-risk and low-risk groups (as assessed with both tasks), while the high-risk group showed more negative interpretation biases than the low-risk group only as assessed via the SST. The results indicate that the negative interpretation biases that are to some extent already present in high-risk populations before disorder onset are strongly amplified in currently depressed youth. The different findings for the two tasks suggest that more implicit interpretation biases (assessed with the SST) might represent cognitive vulnerabilities for depression whereas more explicit interpretation biases (assessed with the AST) may arise as a consequence of depressive symptomatology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32654075
doi: 10.1007/s10802-020-00670-3
pii: 10.1007/s10802-020-00670-3
pmc: PMC7445197
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1337-1350Références
Cogn Emot. 2018 Nov;32(7):1478-1486
pubmed: 28366048
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011 Jan;52(1):24-32
pubmed: 20629805
Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Apr;69:51-66
pubmed: 29961601
J Abnorm Psychol. 2000 Nov;109(4):602-15
pubmed: 11195984
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Dec;9(12):947-57
pubmed: 19002191
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2013 Sep;41(5):319-34
pubmed: 23988834
Am J Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;171(2):195-200
pubmed: 24030200
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:1-24
pubmed: 24387236
Cognit Ther Res. 2017;41(1):73-88
pubmed: 28239214
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;49(4):433-40
pubmed: 18221352
J Affect Disord. 2018 Dec 1;241:446-453
pubmed: 30145516
Clin Psychol Rev. 2005 Nov;25(7):975-1002
pubmed: 15905008
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016;12:281-305
pubmed: 27019398
Behav Res Methods. 2007 Aug;39(3):606-9
pubmed: 17958174
Psychol Rev. 1999 Jul;106(3):458-90
pubmed: 10467895
J Abnorm Psychol. 2003 Aug;112(3):353-63
pubmed: 12943014
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Dec;75(6):1559-71
pubmed: 9914666
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011 Jul 06;12(8):467-77
pubmed: 21731066
Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Mar;60:1-14
pubmed: 29305152
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 17;12(7):e0181147
pubmed: 28715495
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2007 Mar;10(1):1-24
pubmed: 17318382
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Aug 15;228(2):223-7
pubmed: 25998002
Lancet. 2012 Mar 17;379(9820):1056-67
pubmed: 22305766
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006 Mar-Apr;47(3-4):296-312
pubmed: 16492261
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:285-312
pubmed: 20192795
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2018 Jan;46(1):159-167
pubmed: 28299526
Psychol Bull. 2006 Jan;132(1):132-49
pubmed: 16435960
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Dec;58:33-48
pubmed: 28974339
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018 Nov;59(11):1127-1142
pubmed: 29052865
Emotion. 2014 Apr;14(2):331-40
pubmed: 24512247
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2009 Jan;37(1):79-91
pubmed: 18679791
J Abnorm Psychol. 1993 Feb;102(1):133-44
pubmed: 8436689
Cogn Emot. 2017 Apr;31(3):462-483
pubmed: 26785312
Psychol Med. 2015 Feb;45(3):505-14
pubmed: 25007761
Cogn Emot. 2017 Feb;31(2):369-376
pubmed: 26494318
J Abnorm Psychol. 2019 Feb;128(2):151-161
pubmed: 30714796
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002 Mar;59(3):225-31
pubmed: 11879160
Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Feb;9(2):69-74
pubmed: 15668099
Clin Psychol Rev. 2005 Jun;25(4):487-510
pubmed: 15914266
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;50:250-6
pubmed: 26476463
Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Jul;32(5):413-24
pubmed: 22681914
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;60(8):837-44
pubmed: 12912767
Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Aug;32(6):575-603
pubmed: 22858684
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Sep 18;14:263
pubmed: 25269863
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2016 Jul;44(5):991-8
pubmed: 26471896
JAMA. 1999 May 12;281(18):1707-13
pubmed: 10328070
Cognit Ther Res. 2014 Apr 1;38(2):89-102
pubmed: 24729643
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Jun;163(6):1001-8
pubmed: 16741200
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2022 Feb;53(1):89-108
pubmed: 33398688
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999 Jan;38(1):56-63
pubmed: 9893417