Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Versus Sunitinib for Patients with Untreated Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma and Sarcomatoid Features: A Prespecified Subgroup Analysis of the IMmotion151 Clinical Trial.
IMmotion151
RCC
atezolizumab
bevacizumab
metastatic renal cell carcinoma
sRCC
sarcomatoid
Journal
European urology
ISSN: 1873-7560
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 7512719
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2021
05 2021
Historique:
received:
25
02
2020
accepted:
10
06
2020
pubmed:
14
7
2020
medline:
10
2
2022
entrez:
14
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid features (sRCC) have a poor prognosis and have shown limited responsiveness to inhibition of the VEGF pathway. We conducted a prespecified analysis of the randomised, phase 3 IMmotion151 trial in previously untreated patients with advanced or metastatic RCC to assess the effectiveness of atezolizumab + bevacizumab versus sunitinib in a subgroup of patients with sarcomatoid features. Patients whose tumour had any component of sarcomatoid features were included and received atezolizumab + bevacizumab (n = 68) or sunitinib (n = 74). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the group receiving atezolizumab + bevacizumab overall (8.3 vs 5.3 mo; hazard ratio [HR] 0.52 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.79) and in the subset of patients with PD-L1-positive tumours (8.6 vs 5.6 mo; HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.26-0.77). More patients receiving atezolizumab + bevacizumab achieved an objective response (49% vs 14%), including complete responses (10% vs 3%), and reported greater symptom improvements versus sunitinib. Safety was consistent with the known profiles of each drug and with that reported in the overall safety-evaluable population of IMmotion151. This analysis supports enhanced activity of atezolizumab + bevacizumab in patients with sRCC. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we looked at patients with a specific type of kidney cancer (tumours with sarcomatoid features) that has been hard to treat. A treatment with two drugs (atezolizumab and bevacizumab) appeared to help patients live longer without the disease getting worse than another drug (sunitinib) that is often used. Patients who took the two drugs also said they were better able to carry out their everyday activities than patients who took sunitinib. The combination of these two drugs may work better in patients with this type of advanced kidney cancer.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32654802
pii: S0302-2838(20)30450-4
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.021
pmc: PMC9376009
mid: NIHMS1819590
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Pharmaceutical Preparations
0
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
atezolizumab
52CMI0WC3Y
Sunitinib
V99T50803M
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
659-662Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
Pathology. 1999 Aug;31(3):185-90
pubmed: 10503259
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan 10;27(2):235-41
pubmed: 19064974
Eur Urol. 2015 Jan;67(1):85-97
pubmed: 24857407
Oncologist. 2012;17(1):46-54
pubmed: 22234634
Cancer. 1997 Sep 1;80(5):987-9
pubmed: 9307203
Lancet. 2019 Jun 15;393(10189):2404-2415
pubmed: 31079938
J Urol. 2002 Sep;168(3):959-61
pubmed: 12187199
J Urol. 2009 Nov;182(5):2164-71
pubmed: 19758641
Cancer Immunol Res. 2015 Dec;3(12):1303-7
pubmed: 26307625