Neurological diseases of unknown etiology: Brain-biopsy diagnostic yields and safety.
Brain lesion
Cryptogenic neurological disease
Diagnostic workup
Neuropathology
Neurosurgery
Journal
European journal of internal medicine
ISSN: 1879-0828
Titre abrégé: Eur J Intern Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9003220
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
received:
16
03
2020
revised:
04
05
2020
accepted:
16
05
2020
pubmed:
14
7
2020
medline:
16
2
2021
entrez:
14
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
For nonneoplastic neurological diseases, no recommendation exists regarding the place or appropriate timing of brain biopsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and safety of brain biopsies from patients with neurological diseases of unknown etiology. We performed a retrospective cohort study from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2018. We analyzed 1847 brain-biopsied patients, including 178 biopsies indicated for neurological diseases of unknown etiology. Specific histological and final diagnosis rates, positive diagnosis-associated factors, complication rate and complication-associated factors were assessed. Specific histological diagnosis and final diagnosis rates were 71.3% and 83.1%, respectively, leading to therapeutic management change(s) for 75.3% of patients. Brain- biopsy-related mortality and permanent neurological morbidity occurred in 1.1% and 0.6% of the patients, respectively. The multivariable logistic-regression model retained (odds ratio [95% CI] only immunodepression (2.2 [1.1-4.7]; P=.04) as being independently associated with specific histological diagnosis, while supratentorial biopsy-targeted lesions (4.1 [1.1-15.2]; P=.04) were independently associated with a final diagnosis. Biopsies obtained from comatose patients were less contributive to the diagnosis (0.2 [0.05-0.7]; P=.01). Prebiopsy platelet count <100 G/L (28.5 [1.8-447]; P=.02), hydrocephalus (6.3 [1.2-15.3]; P=.02) and targeted lesions <1 cm (4.3 [1.2-15.3]; P=.03) were independently associated with brain biopsy-related complications. For highly selected patients with neurological diseases of unknown etiology, brain biopsy has a high diagnostic yield and low frequency of severe complications. We advocate that this procedure be considered early in the diagnosis algorithm of these patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
For nonneoplastic neurological diseases, no recommendation exists regarding the place or appropriate timing of brain biopsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and safety of brain biopsies from patients with neurological diseases of unknown etiology.
METHODS
We performed a retrospective cohort study from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2018. We analyzed 1847 brain-biopsied patients, including 178 biopsies indicated for neurological diseases of unknown etiology. Specific histological and final diagnosis rates, positive diagnosis-associated factors, complication rate and complication-associated factors were assessed.
RESULTS
Specific histological diagnosis and final diagnosis rates were 71.3% and 83.1%, respectively, leading to therapeutic management change(s) for 75.3% of patients. Brain- biopsy-related mortality and permanent neurological morbidity occurred in 1.1% and 0.6% of the patients, respectively. The multivariable logistic-regression model retained (odds ratio [95% CI] only immunodepression (2.2 [1.1-4.7]; P=.04) as being independently associated with specific histological diagnosis, while supratentorial biopsy-targeted lesions (4.1 [1.1-15.2]; P=.04) were independently associated with a final diagnosis. Biopsies obtained from comatose patients were less contributive to the diagnosis (0.2 [0.05-0.7]; P=.01). Prebiopsy platelet count <100 G/L (28.5 [1.8-447]; P=.02), hydrocephalus (6.3 [1.2-15.3]; P=.02) and targeted lesions <1 cm (4.3 [1.2-15.3]; P=.03) were independently associated with brain biopsy-related complications.
CONCLUSION
For highly selected patients with neurological diseases of unknown etiology, brain biopsy has a high diagnostic yield and low frequency of severe complications. We advocate that this procedure be considered early in the diagnosis algorithm of these patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32654880
pii: S0953-6205(20)30214-4
doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2020.05.029
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
78-85Investigateurs
Alexandre Carpentier
(A)
Laurent Capelle
(L)
Soledad Navarro
(S)
Olivier Benveniste
(O)
Dimitri Psimaras
(D)
Khê Hoang-Xuan
(K)
Jean-Yves Delattre
(JY)
Nicolas Weiss
(N)
Clémence Marois
(C)
Sarah Benghanem
(S)
Nadine Martin-Duverneuil
(N)
Véronique Leblond
(V)
Sylvain Choquet
(S)
Charles-Edouard Luyt
(CE)
Alain Combes
(A)
Eric Caumes
(E)
Vincent Calvez
(V)
Aude Jary
(A)
Renaud Piarroux
(R)
Alexandra Aubry
(A)
Vincent Degos
(V)
Alice Jacquens
(A)
Caroline Papeix
(C)
Vincent Navarro
(V)
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.