Comparison of Predictability Using Barrett Universal II and SRK/T Formulas according to Keratometry.


Journal

Journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 2090-004X
Titre abrégé: J Ophthalmol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101524199

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 22 12 2019
revised: 25 05 2020
accepted: 28 05 2020
entrez: 14 7 2020
pubmed: 14 7 2020
medline: 14 7 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To compare the predictability of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation using the Barrett Universal II and the SRK/T formulas, according to the keratometry. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical charts of 335 consecutive eyes undergoing standard cataract surgery. IOL power calculations were performed using the Barrett Universal II and the SRK/T formulas. We compared the prediction error, the absolute error, and the percentages within ±0.25, ±0.5, and ±1.0 D of the targeted refraction, 1 month postoperatively, and also investigated the relationship of these outcomes with the keratometric readings, using the two formulas. The prediction error using the SRK/T formula was significantly more myopic than that using the Barrett Universal II formula (the paired The Barrett Universal II formula provides a better predictability of IOL power calculation and is less susceptible to the effect of the corneal shape, than the SRK/T formula. The Barrett Universal formula, instead of the SRK/T formula, may be clinically helpful for improving the refractive accuracy, especially in eyes with steep or flat corneas.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32655942
doi: 10.1155/2020/7625725
pmc: PMC7321508
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

7625725

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Kei Iijima et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Références

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Sep;43(9):1149-1156
pubmed: 28991610
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Mar;41(3):548-56
pubmed: 25708208
Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep;160(3):403-405.e1
pubmed: 26117311
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2017 Oct-Dec;12(4):385-389
pubmed: 29090047
Ophthalmology. 2018 Feb;125(2):169-178
pubmed: 28951074
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993 Nov;19(6):713-20
pubmed: 8271166
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Oct;42(10):1490-1500
pubmed: 27839605
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990 May;16(3):333-40
pubmed: 2355321
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 May;40(5):764-73
pubmed: 24767910
J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:1917268
pubmed: 27119018

Auteurs

Kei Iijima (K)

Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan.

Kazutaka Kamiya (K)

Visual Physiology, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan.

Yoshihiko Iida (Y)

Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan.

Nobuyuki Shoji (N)

Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan.

Classifications MeSH