Higher Physiologic Platelet Counts in Whole Blood Are Not Associated With Improved ACL Cross-sectional Area or Signal Intensity 6 Months After Bridge-Enhanced ACL Repair.
ACL
ACL repair
MRI
complete blood cell count
signal intensity
white blood cell count
Journal
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
07
02
2020
accepted:
21
02
2020
entrez:
14
7
2020
pubmed:
14
7
2020
medline:
14
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A bridge-enhanced anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair (BEAR) procedure places an extracellular matrix implant, combined with autologous whole blood, in the gap between the torn ends of the ligament at the time of suture repair to stimulate healing. Prior studies have suggested that white blood cell (WBC) and platelet concentrations significantly affect the healing of other musculoskeletal tissues. The purpose of this study was to determine whether concentrations of various blood cell types placed into a bridging extracellular matrix implant at the time of ACL repair would have a significant effect on the healing ligament cross-sectional area or tissue organization (as measured by signal intensity). We hypothesized that patients with higher physiologic platelet and lower WBC counts would have improved healing of the ACL on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (higher cross-sectional area and/or lower signal intensity) 6 months after surgery. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. A total of 61 patients underwent MRI at 6 months after bridge-enhanced ACL repair as part of the BEAR II trial. The normalized signal intensity and average cross-sectional area of the healing ligament were measured from a magnetic resonance stack obtained using a gradient echo sequence. The results were stratified by sex, and univariate and multivariate regression analyses determined significant correlations between blood cell concentrations on these 2 magnetic resonance parameters. In unadjusted analyses, older age and male sex were associated with greater healing ligament cross-sectional area ( Although older age, male sex, and monocyte concentration in female patients were associated with greater healing ligament cross-sectional area, signal intensity of the healing ligament was independent of these factors. Physiologic platelet concentration did not have any significant effect on cross-sectional area or signal intensity of the healing ACL at 6 months after bridge-enhanced ACL repair in this cohort. Given these findings, factors other than the physiologic platelet concentration and total WBC concentration may be more important in the rate and amount of ACL healing after bridge-enhanced ACL repair.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
A bridge-enhanced anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair (BEAR) procedure places an extracellular matrix implant, combined with autologous whole blood, in the gap between the torn ends of the ligament at the time of suture repair to stimulate healing. Prior studies have suggested that white blood cell (WBC) and platelet concentrations significantly affect the healing of other musculoskeletal tissues.
PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to determine whether concentrations of various blood cell types placed into a bridging extracellular matrix implant at the time of ACL repair would have a significant effect on the healing ligament cross-sectional area or tissue organization (as measured by signal intensity). We hypothesized that patients with higher physiologic platelet and lower WBC counts would have improved healing of the ACL on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (higher cross-sectional area and/or lower signal intensity) 6 months after surgery.
STUDY DESIGN
METHODS
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS
METHODS
A total of 61 patients underwent MRI at 6 months after bridge-enhanced ACL repair as part of the BEAR II trial. The normalized signal intensity and average cross-sectional area of the healing ligament were measured from a magnetic resonance stack obtained using a gradient echo sequence. The results were stratified by sex, and univariate and multivariate regression analyses determined significant correlations between blood cell concentrations on these 2 magnetic resonance parameters.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In unadjusted analyses, older age and male sex were associated with greater healing ligament cross-sectional area (
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Although older age, male sex, and monocyte concentration in female patients were associated with greater healing ligament cross-sectional area, signal intensity of the healing ligament was independent of these factors. Physiologic platelet concentration did not have any significant effect on cross-sectional area or signal intensity of the healing ACL at 6 months after bridge-enhanced ACL repair in this cohort. Given these findings, factors other than the physiologic platelet concentration and total WBC concentration may be more important in the rate and amount of ACL healing after bridge-enhanced ACL repair.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32656289
doi: 10.1177/2325967120927655
pii: 10.1177_2325967120927655
pmc: PMC7331772
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2325967120927655Subventions
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 AR056834
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 AR065462
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: Funding was received from the Translational Research Program at Boston Children’s Hospital, the Children’s Hospital Orthopaedic Surgery Foundation, the Children’s Hospital Sports Medicine Foundation, and the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (grants R01-AR065462 and R01-AR056834). This research was also conducted with support from the Football Players Health Study at Harvard University. The Football Players Health Study is funded by a grant from the National Football League Players Association. The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of Harvard Medical School, Harvard University or its affiliated academic health care centers, the National Football League Players Association, Boston Children’s Hospital, or the National Institutes of Health. M.M.M. and Boston Children’s Hospital have equity interests in MIACH Orthopaedics, a company that has licensed the BEAR scaffolding technology from Boston Children’s Hospital. M.M.M. has also received honoraria from the Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation and royalties from Springer Publishing. B.C.F. has received educational support from Smith & Nephew, consulting fees from the New York R&D Center for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, and royalties from Springer and is a paid associate editor for The American Journal of Sports Medicine. D.E.K. has received educational support from Kairos Surgical. B.L.P. has equity interests in and is a consultant for MIACH Orthopedics. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.
Références
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Mar;41(3):560-6
pubmed: 23348076
Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Nov 21;4(11):2325967116672176
pubmed: 27900338
Am J Sports Med. 2019 May;47(6):1361-1369
pubmed: 30986359
Asian J Sports Med. 2013 Jun;4(2):158-62
pubmed: 23802059
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2016 May;241(10):1084-97
pubmed: 27229903
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Nov;40(11):2509-16
pubmed: 22962290
Acta Orthop Scand. 1984 Jun;55(3):270-2
pubmed: 6377805
J Orthop Res. 2015 Aug;33(8):1180-7
pubmed: 25764143
Am J Pathol. 2015 Oct;185(10):2596-606
pubmed: 26118749
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991 Jun;87(6):1080-8
pubmed: 2034728
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Aug;91(8):987-96
pubmed: 19651823
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Apr;23(4):1161-70
pubmed: 24633008
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2013 Jun 07;4(3):67
pubmed: 23759113
Knee. 2006 Oct;13(5):353-8
pubmed: 16935515
WMJ. ;115(6):317-21
pubmed: 29094869
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Aug 02;6(8):2325967118788045
pubmed: 30116761
Eur J Radiol Open. 2019 Jun 27;6:231-242
pubmed: 31304197
Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012 Jun;13(7):1145-52
pubmed: 21740377
J Orthop Res. 1989;7(4):474-85
pubmed: 2738766
Platelets. 2018 Sep;29(6):556-568
pubmed: 29442539
Am J Clin Pathol. 2020 Jan 1;153(1):14-29
pubmed: 31598629
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 27;7(1):447
pubmed: 28348370
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Feb;17(2):117-24
pubmed: 18974970
Arthroscopy. 2015 May;31(5):981-8
pubmed: 25595696
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jan;45(1):226-233
pubmed: 27268111
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jul;47(8):1831-1843
pubmed: 31166701
Am J Sports Med. 1994 Sep-Oct;22(5):632-44
pubmed: 7810787
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Mar;43(3):693-9
pubmed: 25540298
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Dec;43(12):3062-70
pubmed: 26473014
J Urol. 1996 Jun;155(6):2068-73
pubmed: 8618338
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 30;10(3):e0121713
pubmed: 25823008
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Oct;82(10):1387-97
pubmed: 11057466
Clin J Sport Med. 2019 Jan;29(1):e4-e6
pubmed: 29194097
Adv Med Sci. 2018 Mar;63(1):140-146
pubmed: 29120855
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:7649206
pubmed: 28097149
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993;1(3-4):226-34
pubmed: 8536037
Am J Sports Med. 1990 Jul-Aug;18(4):354-8
pubmed: 2206080
J Orthop Res. 2014 Apr;32(4):492-9
pubmed: 24338640
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 07;7:43301
pubmed: 28265109
Arthroscopy. 2008 Aug;24(8):899-908
pubmed: 18657738
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD001356
pubmed: 15846618
Am J Sports Med. 2001 Nov-Dec;29(6):689-98
pubmed: 11734478
Am J Sports Med. 2001 Nov-Dec;29(6):751-61
pubmed: 11734489
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Mar 22;7(3):2325967118824356
pubmed: 30923725
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:371746
pubmed: 26064903
J Knee Surg. 2008 Jul;21(3):217-24
pubmed: 18686484
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Aug;41(8):1762-70
pubmed: 23857883
J Biomech. 2011 Nov 10;44(16):2843-6
pubmed: 21962290
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Jun;13(3):520-525
pubmed: 30038838
J Orthop Res. 2017 Dec;35(12):2606-2612
pubmed: 28608618
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2007 Jun;17(3):230-7
pubmed: 17501866
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):560-566
pubmed: 30730755
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Mar;10(3):ZE01-3
pubmed: 27135019
J Knee Surg. 2008 Jul;21(3):225-34
pubmed: 18686485
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Mar;44(3):792-800
pubmed: 25925602
Am J Sports Med. 2020 May;48(6):1305-1315
pubmed: 32298131
J Orthop Res. 2011 Jul;29(7):1002-7
pubmed: 21337615
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2018 Mar;6(2):146-149
pubmed: 29600268
Clin Mater. 1992;9(3-4):155-62
pubmed: 10171198
J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2014 Oct-Dec;7(4):189-97
pubmed: 25722595
Arthroscopy. 2012 May;28(5):672-80
pubmed: 22261137