Degree of satisfaction following full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy.

Cervical radiculopathy (CR) full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy (FECF) satisfaction

Journal

Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)
ISSN: 2414-469X
Titre abrégé: J Spine Surg
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101685460

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Historique:
entrez: 14 7 2020
pubmed: 14 7 2020
medline: 14 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Foraminotomy has been reported to be effective for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy (CR). Foraminotomy has been performed by an open approach or minimally invasive approach using a microscope or endoscope. A review of the literature has revealed that both the open and minimally invasive approach provide good clinical results. Since the introduction of full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy (FECF) followed by microendoscopic cervical foraminotomy, we adopted FECF in 2016. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the degree of satisfaction following FECF for CR. A total of 109 consecutive patients underwent FECF for CR. All operations were performed at Iwai Orthopaedic Medical Hospital. Patient background information and operative data were collected. The numerical rating scale (NRS) score for the arm was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at the time of discharge from the hospital. The satisfaction score was also recorded at discharge and the 3 months after the operation. In total 109 patients, the mean age was 51.3 years; 22.9% were female and 77.1% were male. The cervical level most frequently operated on was C6/7, followed by C5/6. The mean hospital stay was 4.7 days. The mean operation time was 61.7 minutes. The estimated blood loss was 0 to 10 mg in all cases. One patient exhibited temporary postoperative muscle weakness, although he recovered within 1 year. There was one case of dural tear, and no cases of nerve root injury or surgical site infection. There was one case of reoperation by microendoscopic surgery in 3 months due to insufficient improvement. Preoperative NRS scores for the arm was 4.6 and it improved significantly postoperatively to 2.1 for the entire study group. The mean satisfaction score at discharge was 7.5. The mean score at 3 months after the operations was 7.4. Degree of satisfaction following FECF for CR was high 3 months after the operation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Foraminotomy has been reported to be effective for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy (CR). Foraminotomy has been performed by an open approach or minimally invasive approach using a microscope or endoscope. A review of the literature has revealed that both the open and minimally invasive approach provide good clinical results. Since the introduction of full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy (FECF) followed by microendoscopic cervical foraminotomy, we adopted FECF in 2016. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the degree of satisfaction following FECF for CR.
METHODS METHODS
A total of 109 consecutive patients underwent FECF for CR. All operations were performed at Iwai Orthopaedic Medical Hospital. Patient background information and operative data were collected. The numerical rating scale (NRS) score for the arm was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at the time of discharge from the hospital. The satisfaction score was also recorded at discharge and the 3 months after the operation.
RESULTS RESULTS
In total 109 patients, the mean age was 51.3 years; 22.9% were female and 77.1% were male. The cervical level most frequently operated on was C6/7, followed by C5/6. The mean hospital stay was 4.7 days. The mean operation time was 61.7 minutes. The estimated blood loss was 0 to 10 mg in all cases. One patient exhibited temporary postoperative muscle weakness, although he recovered within 1 year. There was one case of dural tear, and no cases of nerve root injury or surgical site infection. There was one case of reoperation by microendoscopic surgery in 3 months due to insufficient improvement. Preoperative NRS scores for the arm was 4.6 and it improved significantly postoperatively to 2.1 for the entire study group. The mean satisfaction score at discharge was 7.5. The mean score at 3 months after the operations was 7.4.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Degree of satisfaction following FECF for CR was high 3 months after the operation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32656373
doi: 10.21037/jss.2020.01.02
pii: jss-06-02-366
pmc: PMC7340834
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

366-371

Informations de copyright

2020 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jss.2020.01.02). The series “Full-endoscopic Spine Surgery” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. HK served as the unpaid Guest Editor of the series and serves as an unpaid editorial member of Journal of Spine Surgery from October 2018 to October 2020. The other authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Références

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Aug 15;21(16):1877-83
pubmed: 8875719
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Feb;18(2):154-60
pubmed: 23176164
Neurosurgery. 2002 Nov;51(5 Suppl):S37-45
pubmed: 12234428
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Mar 15;24(6):591-7
pubmed: 10101827
Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Jun;29(5):177-85
pubmed: 27187617
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015 Sep;157(9):1595-600
pubmed: 26144567
Brain. 1994 Apr;117 ( Pt 2):325-35
pubmed: 8186959
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007 Aug;15(8):486-94
pubmed: 17664368
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 Jun;28(5):E251-9
pubmed: 25985461
Spine J. 2015 May 1;15(5):849-56
pubmed: 25623079
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016 Sep;9(3):272-80
pubmed: 27250042
World Neurosurg. 2016 Jul;91:50-7
pubmed: 26987632
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;114:217-227
pubmed: 29602008
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jan 24;19(1):30
pubmed: 29361919
Spine J. 2015 Jun 1;15(6):1203-9
pubmed: 24076442
Int Orthop. 2016 Jun;40(6):1335-43
pubmed: 27112948
Pain Physician. 2019 Jan;22(1):41-52
pubmed: 30700067
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2007 Aug;50(4):219-26
pubmed: 17948181

Auteurs

Juichi Tonosu (J)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kanto Rosai Hospital, Kawasaki-city, Kanagawa, Japan.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Iwai Orthopaedic Medical Hospital, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Yasushi Oshima (Y)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Yuichi Takano (Y)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Iwai Orthopaedic Medical Hospital, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inanami Spine and Joint Hospital, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Hirohiko Inanami (H)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Iwai Orthopaedic Medical Hospital, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inanami Spine and Joint Hospital, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Hiroki Iwai (H)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Iwai Orthopaedic Medical Hospital, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inanami Spine and Joint Hospital, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Iwai FESS Clinic, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Hisashi Koga (H)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Iwai Orthopaedic Medical Hospital, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inanami Spine and Joint Hospital, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Iwai FESS Clinic, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Classifications MeSH