Comparative study between full-endoscopic laminectomy and microendoscopic laminectomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis.

Lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) cauda equina symptom full-endoscopic spine surgery laminectomy minimally invasive radiculopathy

Journal

Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)
ISSN: 2414-469X
Titre abrégé: J Spine Surg
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101685460

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Historique:
entrez: 14 7 2020
pubmed: 14 7 2020
medline: 14 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) is a common disease in the elderly. Although surgical decompression using a posterior approach is commonly used to treat LSCS, there are several different strategies. We compared the outcomes of uniportal full-endoscopic laminectomy (FEL) and microendoscopic laminectomy (MEL) for treating LSCS. FEL was performed using a 6.4-mm working channel endoscope and MEL was performed using a 16-mm diameter tubular retractor and endoscope. Patients with LSCS treated with FEL (n=60) and MEL (n=54) in our hospital during the same period were retrospectively reviewed. Patient background information and operative data were collected. The satisfaction score was also recorded at discharge and 3 months postoperatively. The mean operation time for FEL and MEL was 77.8 min and 54.6 min, respectively. The mean hospital stay after FEL and MEL surgery was 2.1 days and 4.7 days, respectively. These outcomes were significantly different between the two approaches. The satisfaction scores at both stages were not significantly different between the two groups. A dural tear occurred in one patient who underwent FEL and three patients who underwent MEL, but no symptoms resulted from the tear. Although postoperative hematoma occurred in seven who underwent FEL and two who underwent MEL, only one patient who underwent FEL required operative evacuation of the hematoma. FEL using a 6.4-mm working channel endoscope can be used to treat patients with LSCS. Shortening of the operation time and prevention of postoperative hematoma are essential for this approach to be completely superior to MEL.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) is a common disease in the elderly. Although surgical decompression using a posterior approach is commonly used to treat LSCS, there are several different strategies. We compared the outcomes of uniportal full-endoscopic laminectomy (FEL) and microendoscopic laminectomy (MEL) for treating LSCS.
METHODS METHODS
FEL was performed using a 6.4-mm working channel endoscope and MEL was performed using a 16-mm diameter tubular retractor and endoscope. Patients with LSCS treated with FEL (n=60) and MEL (n=54) in our hospital during the same period were retrospectively reviewed. Patient background information and operative data were collected. The satisfaction score was also recorded at discharge and 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS RESULTS
The mean operation time for FEL and MEL was 77.8 min and 54.6 min, respectively. The mean hospital stay after FEL and MEL surgery was 2.1 days and 4.7 days, respectively. These outcomes were significantly different between the two approaches. The satisfaction scores at both stages were not significantly different between the two groups. A dural tear occurred in one patient who underwent FEL and three patients who underwent MEL, but no symptoms resulted from the tear. Although postoperative hematoma occurred in seven who underwent FEL and two who underwent MEL, only one patient who underwent FEL required operative evacuation of the hematoma.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
FEL using a 6.4-mm working channel endoscope can be used to treat patients with LSCS. Shortening of the operation time and prevention of postoperative hematoma are essential for this approach to be completely superior to MEL.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32656392
doi: 10.21037/jss-20-620
pii: jss-06-02-E3
pmc: PMC7340829
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

E3-E11

Informations de copyright

2020 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jss-20-620). The series “Full-endoscopic Spine Surgery” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. HK served as the unpaid Guest Editor of the series and serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Journal of Spine Surgery from Oct 2018 to Oct 2020. The other authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Références

Eur Spine J. 2016 Jun;25(6):1912-9
pubmed: 26223744
Neurospine. 2019 Mar;16(1):41-51
pubmed: 30943706
Pain Physician. 2015 Jan-Feb;18(1):61-70
pubmed: 25675060
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Jul;24(5):281-7
pubmed: 20975592
Eur Spine J. 2013 Sep;22(9):2105-12
pubmed: 23649957
World Neurosurg. 2018 Nov;119:e276-e283
pubmed: 30053559
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(1):e18555
pubmed: 31895797
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Mar 24;2019:6078469
pubmed: 31019969
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Aug 15;37(18):E1093-8
pubmed: 22565391
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jul 15;41(14):E857-68
pubmed: 27128388
Global Spine J. 2017 Feb;7(1):54-58
pubmed: 28451510
Global Spine J. 2012 Jun;2(2):87-94
pubmed: 24353952
J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 May;10(5):476-85
pubmed: 19442011
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(50):e5186
pubmed: 27977571
Neurospine. 2019 Mar;16(1):63-71
pubmed: 30943708
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jan 24;19(1):30
pubmed: 29361919
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Apr;131:21-5
pubmed: 25666763
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jul 15;36(16):1268-72
pubmed: 21270704
World Neurosurg. 2017 May;101:33-41
pubmed: 28153626
Asian Spine J. 2019 Apr;13(2):272-282
pubmed: 30472819
World Neurosurg. 2017 Jul;103:201-209
pubmed: 28389410
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E9
pubmed: 31042664

Auteurs

Hiroki Iwai (H)

Department of Neurosurgery, Iwai FESS Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedics, Iwai Orthopaedic Medical Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inanami Spine and Joint Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Hirohiko Inanami (H)

Department of Neurosurgery, Iwai FESS Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedics, Iwai Orthopaedic Medical Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inanami Spine and Joint Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Hisashi Koga (H)

Department of Neurosurgery, Iwai FESS Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedics, Iwai Orthopaedic Medical Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inanami Spine and Joint Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Classifications MeSH