Cost-utility of an eHealth application 'Oncokompas' that supports cancer survivors in self-management: results of a randomised controlled trial.
Cancer survivorship
Cost-utility
Quality of life
Self-management
Supportive care
eHealth
Journal
Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice
ISSN: 1932-2267
Titre abrégé: J Cancer Surviv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101307557
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2021
02 2021
Historique:
received:
10
03
2020
accepted:
26
06
2020
pubmed:
14
7
2020
medline:
21
10
2021
entrez:
14
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The eHealth self-management application 'Oncokompas' was developed to support cancer survivors in monitoring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and symptoms, and obtaining personalized feedback and options for supportive care. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-utility of Oncokompas compared with care as usual (CAU) among cancer survivors. Survivors were randomly allocated to the intervention or control group. Direct (non-)medical, indirect non-medical costs, and HRQOL were measured at 3- and 6-month follow-up, using iMTA Medical Consumption and Productivity Costs and the EuroQol-5D questionnaires. Mean cumulative costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were compared between both groups. In total, 625 survivors were randomized into intervention (n = 320) or control group (n = 305). Base case analysis showed that incremental costs from a societal perspective were - €163 (95% CI, - 665 to 326), and incremental QALYs were 0.0017 (95% CI, - 0.0121 to 0.0155) in the intervention group compared with those in the control group. The probability that, compared with CAU, Oncokompas is more effective was 60%, less costly 73%, and both more effective and less costly 47%. Sensitivity analyses showed that incremental costs vary between - €40 and €69, and incremental QALYs vary between - 0.0023 and - 0.0057. Oncokompas is likely to be equally effective on utilities, and not more expensive than CAU, and will therefore contribute to sustainable cancer survivorship care in a (cost-)effective manner. Oncokompas seems to improve HRQOL and reduces the burden of several tumour-specific symptoms, while costs from a societal perspective are similar to CAU.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32656739
doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00912-9
pii: 10.1007/s11764-020-00912-9
pmc: PMC7822793
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
77-86Références
J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 20;37(15):1326-1335
pubmed: 30925126
Qual Life Res. 2016 Mar;25(3):625-36
pubmed: 26790428
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Jul 9;149(28):1574-8
pubmed: 16038162
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Oct 21;17(10):e235
pubmed: 26489918
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Feb;26(2):337-351
pubmed: 28921391
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(4):410-418
pubmed: 30058505
Mol Oncol. 2019 Mar;13(3):624-635
pubmed: 30552794
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 24;21(1):e10875
pubmed: 30679145
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Aug;27(8):2911-2920
pubmed: 30564933
J Clin Nurs. 2015 May;24(9-10):1367-79
pubmed: 25677218
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Apr;25(4):1323-1355
pubmed: 28058570
Support Care Cancer. 2016 May;24(5):2163-2171
pubmed: 26563178
Acta Oncol. 2018 Jul;57(7):924-934
pubmed: 29451059
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Dec;25(12):3775-3783
pubmed: 28702685
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jan;21(1):80-94
pubmed: 31838009
Trials. 2017 May 22;18(1):228
pubmed: 28532439
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jan 20;32(3):199-205
pubmed: 24344222
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jan 19;103(2):117-28
pubmed: 21228314
Value Health. 2015 Sep;18(6):753-8
pubmed: 26409601
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:142-7
pubmed: 26262027
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Sep;47(14):2188-94
pubmed: 21621408
Psychooncology. 2008 Nov;17(11):1146-51
pubmed: 18626853
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 13;13(6):e0198112
pubmed: 29897921
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:79-88
pubmed: 26327487
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 May 1;111(5):442-448
pubmed: 30726949
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0187477
pubmed: 29121647