Effectiveness of first-line cetuximab in wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer according to tumour BRAF mutation status from the EREBUS cohort.


Journal

British journal of clinical pharmacology
ISSN: 1365-2125
Titre abrégé: Br J Clin Pharmacol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7503323

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2021
Historique:
received: 06 02 2020
revised: 15 06 2020
accepted: 26 06 2020
pubmed: 14 7 2020
medline: 27 7 2021
entrez: 14 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Poor efficacy has been reported for patients with BRAF mutations for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). EREBUS is a French cohort study of wild-type (wt) KRAS unresectable mCRC patients initiating a first-line treatment with cetuximab from 2009 to 2010, followed for two years (five years for vital status). Molecular genetics platforms have provided additional RAS and BRAF mutation testing results. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed according to tumour mutation (mt) status: RASmt/BRAFany, RASwt/BRAFmt and RASwt/BRAFwt. Multivariate Cox analyses were used to evaluate association between mutation status and death or progression. A total of 389 patients were included in 65 centres and with a known tumour mutation status: 64 RASmt/BRAFany (21%), 33 RASwt/BRAFmt (13%) and 213 RASwt/BRAFwt (87%). Respective baseline characteristics were: median age 65, 64 and 63 years, male gender 63%, 64% and 69%, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 1 75%, 76% and 79%, and liver-only metastases 39%, 33% and 40%. Median progression-free survival was 8.0 months [5.9-9.3] for patients with RASmt/BRAFany, 6.0 months [2.3-7.2] for patients with RASwt/BRAFmt, and 10.4 months [9.5-11.0] for patients with RASwt/BRAFwt. Respectively, median overall survival was 18.4 months [10.9-23.3], 9.7 months [6.9-16.6] and 29.3 months [26.3-36.1]. In multivariate analyses, progression (HR = 2.71 [1.79-4.10]) and death (HR = 2.79 [1.81-4.30]) were more likely for RASwt/BRAFmt vs RASwt/BRAFwt patients. BRAF mutations were associated with markedly poorer outcomes in initially unresectable RASwt mCRC patients treated by cetuximab in first-line treatment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32656857
doi: 10.1111/bcp.14472
doi:

Substances chimiques

KRAS protein, human 0
BRAF protein, human EC 2.7.11.1
Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf EC 2.7.11.1
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) EC 3.6.5.2
Cetuximab PQX0D8J21J

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1120-1128

Subventions

Organisme : Merck Serono S.A.S., an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The British Pharmacological Society.

Références

Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S, et al. Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(4):337-345.
Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Makhson A, et al. Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(5):663-671.
Van Cutsem E, Kohne CH, Hitre E, et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(14):1408-1417.
Lievre A, Bachet JB, Le Corre D, et al. KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66(8):3992-3995.
Di Fiore F, Blanchard F, Charbonnier F, et al. Clinical relevance of KRAS mutation detection in metastatic colorectal cancer treated by cetuximab plus chemotherapy. Br J Cancer. 2007;96(8):1166-1169.
Lievre A, Merlin JL, Sabourin JC, et al. RAS mutation testing in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in French clinical practice: a status report in 2014. Dig Liver Dis. 2018;50(5):507-512.
Bokemeyer C, Kohne CH, Ciardiello F, et al. FOLFOX4 plus cetuximab treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(10):1243-1252.
Van Cutsem E, Lenz HJ, Kohne CH, et al. Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan plus cetuximab treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(7):692-700.
Stintzing S, Miller-Phillips L, Modest DP, et al. Impact of BRAF and RAS mutations on first-line efficacy of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab: analysis of the FIRE-3 (AIO KRK-0306) study. Eur J Cancer. 2017;79:50-60.
Di Nicolantonio F, Martini M, Molinari F, et al. Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(35):5705-5712.
Loupakis F, Ruzzo A, Cremolini C, et al. KRAS codon 61, 146 and BRAF mutations predict resistance to cetuximab plus irinotecan in KRAS codon 12 and 13 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2009;101(4):715-721.
Laurent-Puig P, Cayre A, Manceau G, et al. Analysis of PTEN, BRAF, and EGFR status in determining benefit from cetuximab therapy in wild-type KRAS metastatic colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(35):5924-5930.
De Roock W, Claes B, Bernasconi D, et al. Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(8):753-762.
Benedix F, Kube R, Meyer F, et al. Comparison of 17,641 patients with right- and left-sided colon cancer: differences in epidemiology, perioperative course, histology, and survival. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(1):57-64.
Wang F, Bai L, Liu TS, et al. Right-sided colon cancer and left-sided colorectal cancers respond differently to cetuximab. Chin J Cancer. 2015;34(9):384-393.
Tejpar S, Stintzing S, Ciardiello F, et al. Prognostic and predictive relevance of primary tumor location in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: retrospective analyses of the CRYSTAL and FIRE-3 trials. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(2):194-201.
Boeckx N, Janssens K, Van Camp G, et al. The predictive value of primary tumor location in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2018;121:1-10.
Rouyer M, Francois E, Cunha AS, et al. Effectiveness of cetuximab as first-line therapy for patients with wild-type KRAS and unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer in real-life practice: results of the EREBUS cohort. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018;17(2):129-139.
Bokemeyer C, Van Cutsem E, Rougier P, et al. Addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy as first-line treatment for KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: pooled analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS randomised clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(10):1466-1475.
Kaczirek K, Ciuleanu TE, Vrbanec D, et al. FOLFOX4 plus cetuximab for patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer according to tumor RAS and BRAF mutation status: updated analysis of the CECOG/CORE 1.2.002 study. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2015;14(2):91-98.
Normanno N, Esposito Abate R, Lambiase M, et al. RAS testing of liquid biopsy correlates with the outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line FOLFIRI plus cetuximab in the CAPRI-GOIM trial. Ann Oncol. 2017;29(1):112-118.
Arnold D, Lueza B, Douillard JY, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of primary tumour side in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy and EGFR directed antibodies in six randomized trials. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(8):1713-1729.
Petrelli F, Tomasello G, Borgonovo K, et al. Prognostic survival associated with left-sided vs right-sided colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(2):211-219.
Chen D, Li L, Zhang X, et al. FOLFOX plus anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody (mAb) is an effective first-line treatment for patients with RAS-wild left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(10):e0097.
Benson AB 3rd, Venook AP, Cederquist L, et al. Colon cancer, version 1.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15(3):370-398.
Douillard JY, Oliner KS, Siena S, et al. Panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(11):1023-1034.
Seymour MT, Brown SR, Middleton G, et al. Panitumumab and irinotecan versus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type, fluorouracil-resistant advanced colorectal cancer (PICCOLO): a prospectively stratified randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(8):749-759.
European Medicines Agency. Erbitux: EPAR_Product information. Available at: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000558/WC500029119.pdf
Tsilimigras DI, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Bagante F, et al. Clinical significance and prognostic relevance of KRAS, BRAF, PI3K and TP53 genetic mutation analysis for resectable and unresectable colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review of the current evidence. Surg Oncol. 2018;27(2):280-288.
van Brummelen EMJ, de Boer A, Beijnen JH, Schellens JHM. BRAF mutations as predictive biomarker for response to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Oncologist. 2017;22(7):864-872.
Febbo PG, Ladanyi M, Aldape KD, et al. NCCN task force report: evaluating the clinical utility of tumor markers in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2011;9(Suppl 5):S1-S32.
Phelip JM, Tougeron D, Leonard D, et al. Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): French intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, SFR). Dig Liver Dis. 2019;51(10):1357-1363.

Auteurs

Magali Rouyer (M)

Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Eric François (E)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.

Antonio Sa Cunha (A)

Centre Hépato-Biliaire, AP-HP, Hôpital Paul Brousse, University Paris Sud, Paris Saclay, Inserm U 935 and U 1193, Villejuif, France.

Alain Monnereau (A)

Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, UMR 1219, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Emmanuelle Bignon (E)

Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Jérémy Jové (J)

Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Régis Lassalle (R)

Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Cécile Droz-Perroteau (C)

Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Nicholas Moore (N)

Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, UMR 1219, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Pôle de santé publique, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Pernelle Noize (P)

Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, UMR 1219, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Pôle de santé publique, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Annie Fourrier-Réglat (A)

Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, UMR 1219, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Pôle de santé publique, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Denis Smith (D)

Hepato-Gastro-Enterology and Digestive Oncology Department, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH