The Impact of Environmental Factors on the Efficacy of Chemical Communication in the Burying Beetle (Coleoptera: Silphidae).
forest management
land-use intensity
mate choice
sex pheromone
signal efficacy
Journal
Journal of insect science (Online)
ISSN: 1536-2442
Titre abrégé: J Insect Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101096396
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jul 2020
01 Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
10
04
2020
entrez:
14
7
2020
pubmed:
14
7
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is growing evidence that a wide range of insect sex pheromones are condition dependent and play a fundamental role in mate choice. However, the effectiveness of pheromonal communication might not only depend on internal factors of the sender, but also on attributes of the microhabitat, in which the signaler chooses to emit its chemical signal. For example, the degree of anthropogenic land use might affect how successful the signal is transmitted, as land use has been shown to affect animal communities and the complexity of biotic interactions. To test the hypothesis that parameters of the microenvironment determine males' ability to attract females via their sex pheromone, we used the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides Herbst (Coleoptera: Silphidae) as our model system. We exposed 144 males across differently managed forest stands and analyzed the impact of 29 environmental parameters. Our data revealed that human land use intensity had no effect on a male's attractiveness. However, the harvested tree biomass positively affected the proportion of competitors attracted. Furthermore, we found that soil characteristics were important factors determining the amount and body size of females a male was able to attract. Consequently, we present evidence that the environmental context of a signaling male influences the effectiveness of chemical signaling either because it affects the transmission process or the prevailing abundance of potential signal receivers. Thus, our results demonstrate that males need to make careful decisions about the location where they emit their pheromone, as this choice of microhabitat has an impact on their fitness.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32658275
pii: 5870645
doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieaa061
pmc: PMC7357268
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Pheromones
0
Sex Attractants
0
insect attractants
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America.
Références
Curr Biol. 2016 Nov 21;26(22):R1173-R1174
pubmed: 27875691
J Econ Entomol. 2010 Jun;103(3):698-707
pubmed: 20568615
J Anim Ecol. 2017 May;86(3):511-520
pubmed: 28118484
Nature. 2019 Oct;574(7780):671-674
pubmed: 31666721
J Chem Ecol. 2017 Oct;43(10):971-977
pubmed: 29032491
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 23;6(3):e17976
pubmed: 21448292
J Chem Ecol. 2008 Sep;34(9):1134-45
pubmed: 18584255
Annu Rev Entomol. 1998;43:595-618
pubmed: 15012399
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Aug 7;282(1812):20150832
pubmed: 26180067
Insects. 2014 Jun 18;5(2):423-38
pubmed: 26462692
Naturwissenschaften. 2017 Aug;104(7-8):53
pubmed: 28620738
Nature. 2015 Apr 2;520(7545):45-50
pubmed: 25832402
J Econ Entomol. 2008 Dec;101(6):1831-7
pubmed: 19133464
Science. 2000 Mar 10;287(5459):1770-4
pubmed: 10710299
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Jan;84(1):143-54
pubmed: 25074822
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2017 Dec;24:84-88
pubmed: 29208228
J Theor Biol. 1980 May 21;84(2):335-59
pubmed: 7412331
J Chem Ecol. 2001 Aug;27(8):1561-74
pubmed: 11521396
Science. 2005 Jul 22;309(5734):570-4
pubmed: 16040698
Science. 2014 Jul 25;345(6195):401-6
pubmed: 25061202
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011 Aug;86(3):640-57
pubmed: 20977599
J Econ Entomol. 2004 Apr;97(2):321-9
pubmed: 15154451
Ecol Lett. 2012 Apr;15(4):365-377
pubmed: 22257223
Sci Adv. 2015 Jun 19;1(5):e1400253
pubmed: 26601195
Nature. 2003 Jul 17;424(6946):267
pubmed: 12867967
J Chem Ecol. 2008 Jan;34(1):94-8
pubmed: 18080163
Biol Lett. 2007 Aug 22;3(4):368-70
pubmed: 17456449
Evolution. 2017 Apr;71(4):985-994
pubmed: 28145591
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2016 Oct;17:87-91
pubmed: 27720079
J Comp Psychol. 2002 Jun;116(2):137-41
pubmed: 12083606
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Sep 07;280(1766):20131225
pubmed: 23843390
J Theor Biol. 1977 Aug 7;67(3):603-5
pubmed: 904334
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Aug 5;94(16):8618-21
pubmed: 9238026
Curr Biol. 2006 Dec 5;16(23):2326-31
pubmed: 17141614
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Mar 4;7(3):191722
pubmed: 32269801
Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Oct 1;13(10):415-20
pubmed: 21238370
Mol Ecol. 2008 Jan;17(1):72-83
pubmed: 17784917
J Econ Entomol. 2011 Jun;104(3):879-88
pubmed: 21735907
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Apr 30;281(1785):20133102
pubmed: 24789890
PLoS One. 2018 May 30;13(5):e0196839
pubmed: 29847551
J Environ Manage. 2009 Oct;91(1):22-46
pubmed: 19717221
J Chem Ecol. 1984 Jul;10(7):1081-108
pubmed: 24318851
Nature. 2016 Dec 8;540(7632):266-269
pubmed: 27919075
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1995 Feb;70(1):1-65
pubmed: 7718697