Long-term, open-label extension study of the efficacy and safety of epicutaneous immunotherapy for peanut allergy in children: PEOPLE 3-year results.


Journal

The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology
ISSN: 1097-6825
Titre abrégé: J Allergy Clin Immunol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1275002

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2020
Historique:
received: 30 03 2020
revised: 18 06 2020
accepted: 24 06 2020
pubmed: 14 7 2020
medline: 16 3 2021
entrez: 14 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The PEPITES (Peanut EPIT Efficacy and Safety) trial, a 12-month randomized controlled study of children with peanut allergy and 4 to 11 years old, previously reported the safety and efficacy of epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) for peanut allergy (250 μg, daily epicutaneous peanut protein; DBV712 250 μg). We sought to assess interim safety and efficacy of an additional 2 years of EPIT from the ongoing (5-year treatment) PEOPLE (PEPITES Open-Label Extension) study. Subjects who completed PEPITES were offered enrollment in PEOPLE. Following an additional 2 years of daily DBV712 250 μg, subjects who had received DBV712 250 μg in PEPITES underwent month-36 double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge with an optional month-38 sustained unresponsiveness assessment. Of 213 eligible subjects who had received DBV712 250 μg in PEPITES, 198 (93%) entered PEOPLE, of whom 141 (71%) had assessable double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge at month 36. At month 36, 51.8% of subjects (73 of 141) reached an eliciting dose of ≥1000 mg, compared with 40.4% (57 of 141) at month 12; 75.9% (107 of 141) demonstrated increased eliciting dose compared with baseline; and 13.5% (19 of 141) tolerated the full double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge of 5444 mg. Median cumulative reactive dose increased from 144 to 944 mg. Eighteen subjects underwent an optional sustained unresponsiveness assessment; 14 of those (77.8%) maintained an eliciting dose of ≥1000 mg at month 38. Local patch-site skin reactions were common but decreased over time. There was no treatment-related epinephrine use in years 2 or 3. Compliance was high (96.9%), and withdrawals due to treatment-related adverse events were low (1%). These results demonstrate that daily EPIT treatment for peanut allergy beyond 1 year leads to continued response from a well-tolerated, simple-to-use regimen.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The PEPITES (Peanut EPIT Efficacy and Safety) trial, a 12-month randomized controlled study of children with peanut allergy and 4 to 11 years old, previously reported the safety and efficacy of epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) for peanut allergy (250 μg, daily epicutaneous peanut protein; DBV712 250 μg).
OBJECTIVE
We sought to assess interim safety and efficacy of an additional 2 years of EPIT from the ongoing (5-year treatment) PEOPLE (PEPITES Open-Label Extension) study.
METHODS
Subjects who completed PEPITES were offered enrollment in PEOPLE. Following an additional 2 years of daily DBV712 250 μg, subjects who had received DBV712 250 μg in PEPITES underwent month-36 double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge with an optional month-38 sustained unresponsiveness assessment.
RESULTS
Of 213 eligible subjects who had received DBV712 250 μg in PEPITES, 198 (93%) entered PEOPLE, of whom 141 (71%) had assessable double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge at month 36. At month 36, 51.8% of subjects (73 of 141) reached an eliciting dose of ≥1000 mg, compared with 40.4% (57 of 141) at month 12; 75.9% (107 of 141) demonstrated increased eliciting dose compared with baseline; and 13.5% (19 of 141) tolerated the full double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge of 5444 mg. Median cumulative reactive dose increased from 144 to 944 mg. Eighteen subjects underwent an optional sustained unresponsiveness assessment; 14 of those (77.8%) maintained an eliciting dose of ≥1000 mg at month 38. Local patch-site skin reactions were common but decreased over time. There was no treatment-related epinephrine use in years 2 or 3. Compliance was high (96.9%), and withdrawals due to treatment-related adverse events were low (1%).
CONCLUSIONS
These results demonstrate that daily EPIT treatment for peanut allergy beyond 1 year leads to continued response from a well-tolerated, simple-to-use regimen.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32659313
pii: S0091-6749(20)30957-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.06.028
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Allergens 0
Biomarkers 0
Immunoglobulin E 37341-29-0

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

863-874

Subventions

Organisme : AHRQ HHS
ID : K08 HS024599
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

David M Fleischer (DM)

Section of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo. Electronic address: david.fleischer@childrenscolorado.org.

Wayne G Shreffler (WG)

Food Allergy Center, Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.

Dianne E Campbell (DE)

Department of Allergy and Immunology, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia; DBV Technologies, Montrouge, France.

Todd D Green (TD)

DBV Technologies, Montrouge, France; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.

Sara Anvari (S)

Section of Immunology, Allergy and Rheumatology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Tex; Department of Pediatrics, Allergy and Immunology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex.

Amal Assa'ad (A)

Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, The University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Philippe Bégin (P)

Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Kirsten Beyer (K)

Department of Pediatric Pneumology, Immunology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

J Andrew Bird (JA)

Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex.

Terri Brown-Whitehorn (T)

Division of Allergy and Immunology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa; Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.

Aideen Byrne (A)

Paediatric Allergy Department, Our Lady's Children's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Edmond S Chan (ES)

Department of Pediatrics, British Columbia Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Amarjit Cheema (A)

Cheema Research Inc, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.

Sharon Chinthrajah (S)

Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif.

Hey Jin Chong (HJ)

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.

Carla M Davis (CM)

Department of Pediatrics, Allergy and Immunology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex.

Lara S Ford (LS)

Department of Allergy and Immunology, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia; Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Rémi Gagnon (R)

Service d'Allergie et Immunologie, Département de Médecine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Quebec, Canada.

Matthew Greenhawt (M)

Section of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo.

Jonathan O'B Hourihane (JO)

Paediatrics and Child Health, INFANT Centre and Health Research Board-Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; Department of Paediatrics, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland.

Stacie M Jones (SM)

Pediatrics - Allergy and Immunology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, Ark.

Edwin H Kim (EH)

Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.

Lars Lange (L)

Department of Pediatrics, St. Marien Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Bruce J Lanser (BJ)

Division of Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo.

Stephanie Leonard (S)

Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, Calif.

Vera Mahler (V)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen, Germany.

Andreas Maronna (A)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen, Germany.

Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn (A)

Hassenfeld Children's Hospital at New York University Langone Health, New York, NY; Department of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.

Roxanne C Oriel (RC)

Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

Michael O'Sullivan (M)

Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, Australia.

Daniel Petroni (D)

Seattle Allergy and Asthma Research Institute, Seattle, Wash.

Jacqueline A Pongracic (JA)

Allergy and Immunology Division, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.

Susan L Prescott (SL)

Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, The University of Western Australia School of Medicine, Perth, Australia.

Lynda C Schneider (LC)

Division of Immunology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass.

Peter Smith (P)

School of Medical Science, Griffith University, Southport, Australia.

Doris Staab (D)

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pulmonology, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Gordon Sussman (G)

Gordon Sussman Clinical Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Robert Wood (R)

Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md.

William H Yang (WH)

Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa Medical School, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Romain Lambert (R)

DBV Technologies, Montrouge, France.

Aurélie Peillon (A)

DBV Technologies, Montrouge, France.

Timothée Bois (T)

DBV Technologies, Montrouge, France.

Hugh A Sampson (HA)

DBV Technologies, Montrouge, France; Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH