Prenatal diagnosis of transposition of the great arteries: an updated review.

Fetal echocardiography Prenatal diagnosis Transposition of the great arteries Ultrasound cardiac screening

Journal

Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea)
ISSN: 2288-5919
Titre abrégé: Ultrasonography
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101626019

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Historique:
received: 18 04 2020
accepted: 08 06 2020
pubmed: 15 7 2020
medline: 15 7 2020
entrez: 15 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Simple transposition of the great arteries (TGA) is a cyanotic heart disease that accounts for 5% to 7% of all congenital heart diseases. It is commonly underdiagnosed in utero, with prenatal detection rates of less than 50%. Simple TGA is characterized by ventriculoarterial discordance, atrioventricular concordance, and a parallel relationship of TGA. The prenatal diagnosis of TGA influences postnatal outcomes and therefore requires planned delivery and perinatal management. For these reasons, it is important to identify the key ultrasound markers of TGA to improve the prenatal diagnosis and consequently provide perinatal assistance. The presence of two vessels instead of three in the three-vessel tracheal view, a parallel course of TGA, and identification of the origin of each of TGA are the key markers for diagnosing TGA. In addition to the classical ultrasound signs, other two-dimensional ultrasound markers such as an abnormal right convexity of the aorta, an I-shaped aorta, and the "boomerang sign" may also be used to diagnose TGA in the prenatal period. When accessible, an automatic approach using four-dimensional technologies such as spatio-temporal image correlation and sonographically-based volume computer-aided analysis may improve the prenatal diagnosis of TGA. This study aimed to review the ultrasound markers that can be used in the antenatal diagnosis of TGA, with a focus on the tools used by ultrasonographers, the obstetric and fetal medicine team, and perinatal cardiologists to improve the diagnosis of this condition.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32660209
pii: usg.20055
doi: 10.14366/usg.20055
pmc: PMC7515665
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

331-339

Références

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Oct;20(4):340-5
pubmed: 12383314
J Ultrasound Med. 2008 May;27(5):771-6; quiz 777
pubmed: 18424653
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Mar;27(3):281-5
pubmed: 16485324
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jul;28(1):22-5
pubmed: 16795128
Circulation. 2014 May 27;129(21):2183-242
pubmed: 24763516
Cardiol Young. 2005 Feb;15 Suppl 1:88-92
pubmed: 15934698
Am J Cardiol. 1971 Dec;28(6):739-41
pubmed: 5120139
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Nov;44(5):562-7
pubmed: 24585667
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Jun 19;39(12):1890-900
pubmed: 12084585
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;45(3):320-5
pubmed: 25297053
J Ultrasound Med. 2015 Jul;34(7):1329-35
pubmed: 26112638
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2013 Mar;28(1):III-V
pubmed: 23739947
Prenat Diagn. 2010 Jan;30(1):23-9
pubmed: 19911415
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar;41(3):348-59
pubmed: 23460196
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Nov;32(6):762-8
pubmed: 18780310
J Ultrasound Med. 2007 Nov;26(11):1499-510; quiz 1511
pubmed: 17957044
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jan;27(1):107-13
pubmed: 16374757
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Mar;9(3):173-82
pubmed: 9165680
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Mar;172(3):825-30
pubmed: 10063890
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;41(2):168-71
pubmed: 22492362
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 1;118(9):1390-1398
pubmed: 27638097
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Sep;146(1):55-60
pubmed: 19481856
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Oct;22(4):358-67
pubmed: 14528470
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;45(6):678-82
pubmed: 25484180
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Dec;189(6):1792-802
pubmed: 14710117
Pediatrics. 2004 Apr;113(4):e335-40
pubmed: 15060264
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Nov;28(11):1339-49
pubmed: 26298099
Front Pediatr. 2013 Jun 06;1:11
pubmed: 24400257
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;29(6):619-24
pubmed: 17523161
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Feb;32(4):677-680
pubmed: 28969470
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Oct;8(4):241-6
pubmed: 8916376
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jan;25(1):6-11
pubmed: 15619321
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;51(5):659-664
pubmed: 28436133
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun;41(6):667-71
pubmed: 23023957

Auteurs

Nathalie Jeanne Bravo-Valenzuela (NJ)

Department of Obstetrics, Paulista School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo (EPM-UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Cardiology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Alberto Borges Peixoto (AB)

Mário Palmério University Hospital, University of Uberaba (UNIUBE), Uberaba, Brazil.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba, Brazil.

Edward Araujo Júnior (E)

Department of Obstetrics, Paulista School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo (EPM-UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil.

Classifications MeSH