Treatment after ACL injury: Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group.
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
/ complications
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
/ rehabilitation
Athletic Injuries
/ complications
Decision Making, Shared
Humans
Joint Instability
/ etiology
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Multiple Trauma
/ diagnostic imaging
Osteoarthritis, Knee
/ etiology
Radiography
Return to Sport
Risk Factors
Time-to-Treatment
anterior cruciate ligament
consensus statement
knee ACL
Journal
British journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 1473-0480
Titre abrégé: Br J Sports Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0432520
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Jan 2021
Historique:
accepted:
28
04
2020
pubmed:
15
7
2020
medline:
25
5
2021
entrez:
15
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Treatment strategies for ACL injuries continue to evolve. Evidence supporting best practice guidelines to manage ACL injury is largely based on studies with low-level evidence. An international consensus group of experts was convened determine consensus regarding best available evidence on operative versus non-operative treatment for ACL injury. The purpose of this study is to report the consensus statements on operative versus non-operative treatment of ACL injuries developed at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium 2019. Sixty-six international experts on the management of ACL injuries, representing 18 countries, convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Proposed consensus statements were drafted by the Scientific Organising Committee and Session Chairs. Panel participants reviewed preliminary statements prior to the meeting and provided initial agreement and comments on the statement via online survey. During the meeting, discussion and debate occurred for each statement, after which a final vote was then held. Eighty per cent agreement was defined a priori as consensus. A total of 11 of 13 statements on operative versus non-operative treatment of ACL injury reached consensus during the Symposium. Nine statements achieved unanimous support, two reached strong consensus, one did not achieve consensus, and one was removed due to redundancy in the information provided. In highly active patients engaged in jumping, cutting and pivoting sports, early anatomical ACL reconstruction is recommended due to the high risk of secondary meniscus and cartilage injuries with delayed surgery, although a period of progressive rehabilitation to resolve impairments and improve neuromuscular function is recommended. For patients who seek to return to straight plane activities, non-operative treatment with structured, progressive rehabilitation is an acceptable treatment option. However, with persistent functional instability, or when episodes of giving way occur, anatomical ACL reconstruction is indicated. The consensus statements derived from international leaders in the field may assist clinicians in deciding between operative and non-operative treatment with patients after an ACL injur
Identifiants
pubmed: 32661128
pii: bjsports-2020-102200
doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102200
doi:
Types de publication
Consensus Development Conference
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
14-22Investigateurs
Olufemi R Ayeni
(OR)
Charles H Brown
(CH)
Terese L Chmielewski
(TL)
Mark Clatworthy
(M)
Stefano Della Villa
(SD)
Theresa Diermeier
(T)
Lars Engebretsen
(L)
Lucio Ernlund
(L)
Christian Fink
(C)
Freddie H Fu
(FH)
Alan Getgood
(A)
Timothy E Hewett
(TE)
Yasuyuki Ishibashi
(Y)
Darren L Johnson
(DL)
Jon Karlsson
(J)
Andrew D Lynch
(AD)
Jeffrey A Macalena
(JA)
Robert G Marx
(RG)
Jacques Menetrey
(J)
Sean J Meredith
(SJ)
Volker Musahl
(V)
Kentaro Onishi
(K)
Mark V Paterno
(MV)
Thomas Rauer
(T)
Benjamin B Rothrauff
(BB)
Laura C Schmitt
(LC)
Romain Seil
(R)
Eric H Senorski
(EH)
Rainer Siebold
(R)
Lynn Snyder-Mackler
(L)
Tim Spalding
(T)
Eleonore Svantesson
(E)
Kevin E Wilk
(KE)
John W Xerogeanes
(JW)
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.