Technique, radiation safety and image quality for chest X-ray imaging through glass and in mobile settings during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Betacoronavirus
COVID-19
Coronavirus Infections
/ diagnostic imaging
Glass
Humans
Infection Control
/ instrumentation
Occupational Health
/ standards
Pandemics
/ prevention & control
Pneumonia, Viral
/ diagnostic imaging
Radiography, Thoracic
/ instrumentation
Radiology Department, Hospital
/ organization & administration
SARS-CoV-2
COVID-19
Chest imaging
Pandemic
Portable
Radiation safety
X-ray
Journal
Physical and engineering sciences in medicine
ISSN: 2662-4737
Titre abrégé: Phys Eng Sci Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101760671
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
03
07
2020
accepted:
04
07
2020
pubmed:
15
7
2020
medline:
20
9
2020
entrez:
15
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 has led to preparations within our hospital for an expected surge of patients. This included developing a technique to perform mobile chest X-ray imaging through glass, allowing the X-ray unit to remain outside of the patient's room, effectively reducing the cleaning time associated with disinfecting equipment. The technique also reduced the infection risk of radiographers. We assessed the attenuation of different types of glass in the hospital and the technique parameters required to account for the glass filtration and additional source to image distance (SID). Radiation measurements were undertaken in a simulated set-up to determine the appropriate position for staff inside and outside the room to ensure occupational doses were kept as low as reasonably achievable. Image quality was scored and technical parameter information collated. The alternative to imaging through glass is the standard portable chest X-ray within the room. The radiation safety requirements for this standard technique were also assessed. Image quality was found to be acceptable or borderline in 90% of the images taken through glass and the average patient dose was 0.02 millisieverts (mSv) per image. The majority (67%) of images were acquired at 110 kV, with an average 5.5 mAs and with SID ranging from 180 to 300 cm. With staff positioned at greater than 1 m from the patient and at more than 1 m laterally from the tube head outside the room to minimise scatter exposure, air kerma values did not exceed 0.5 microgray (µGy) per image. This method has been implemented successfully.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32662037
doi: 10.1007/s13246-020-00899-8
pii: 10.1007/s13246-020-00899-8
pmc: PMC7355508
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
765-779Références
Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):1-332
pubmed: 18082557
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E26-E31
pubmed: 32267209
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Dec;175(12):1904-10
pubmed: 26457544
Med Phys. 2005 Apr;32(4):1205-25
pubmed: 15895604
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571