A humanness dimension to visual object coding in the brain.


Journal

NeuroImage
ISSN: 1095-9572
Titre abrégé: Neuroimage
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9215515

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 11 2020
Historique:
received: 04 10 2019
revised: 27 05 2020
accepted: 02 07 2020
pubmed: 15 7 2020
medline: 2 3 2021
entrez: 15 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Neuroimaging studies investigating human object recognition have primarily focused on a relatively small number of object categories, in particular, faces, bodies, scenes, and vehicles. More recent studies have taken a broader focus, investigating hypothesized dichotomies, for example, animate versus inanimate, and continuous feature dimensions, such as biologically similarity. These studies typically have used stimuli that are identified as animate or inanimate, neglecting objects that may not fit into this dichotomy. We generated a novel stimulus set including standard objects and objects that blur the animate-inanimate dichotomy, for example, robots and toy animals. We used MEG time-series decoding to study the brain's emerging representation of these objects. Our analysis examined contemporary models of object coding such as dichotomous animacy, as well as several new higher order models that take into account an object's capacity for agency (i.e. its ability to move voluntarily) and capacity to experience the world. We show that early (0-200 ​ms) responses are predicted by the stimulus shape, assessed using a retinotopic model and shape similarity computed from human judgments. Thereafter, higher order models of agency/experience provided a better explanation of the brain's representation of the stimuli. Strikingly, a model of human similarity provided the best account for the brain's representation after an initial perceptual processing phase. Our findings provide evidence for a new dimension of object coding in the human brain - one that has a "human-centric" focus.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32663643
pii: S1053-8119(20)30625-X
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117139
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

117139

Informations de copyright

Crown Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Erika W Contini (EW)

School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Australia; Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Australia.

Erin Goddard (E)

School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Australia; School of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Australia; Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Australia.

Tijl Grootswagers (T)

School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Australia; Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Australia; The MARCS Institute for Brain Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Australia.

Mark Williams (M)

Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Australia.

Thomas Carlson (T)

School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Australia; Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Australia. Electronic address: thomas.carlson@sydney.edu.au.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH