Cost-Effectiveness of Early Detection and Prevention Strategies for Endometrial Cancer-A Systematic Review.
cost-effectiveness
decision analysis
endometrial cancer
prevention
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Jul 2020
11 Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
04
06
2020
revised:
03
07
2020
accepted:
08
07
2020
entrez:
16
7
2020
pubmed:
16
7
2020
medline:
16
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Endometrial cancer is the most common female genital tract cancer in developed countries. We systematically reviewed the current health-economic evidence on early detection and prevention strategies for endometrial cancer based on a search in relevant databases (Medline/Embase/Cochrane Library/CRD/EconLit). Study characteristics and results including life-years gained (LYG), quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gained, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were summarized in standardized evidence tables. Economic results were transformed into 2019 euros using standard conversion methods (GDP-PPP, CPI). Seven studies were included, evaluating (1) screening for endometrial cancer in women with different risk profiles, (2) risk-reducing interventions for women at increased or high risk for endometrial cancer, and (3) genetic testing for germline mutations followed by risk-reducing interventions for diagnosed mutation carriers. Compared to no screening, screening with transvaginal sonography (TVS), biomarker CA-125, and endometrial biopsy yielded an ICER of 43,600 EUR/LYG (95,800 EUR/QALY) in women with Lynch syndrome at high endometrial cancer risk. For women considering prophylactic surgery, surgery was more effective and less costly than screening. In obese women, prevention using Levonorgestrel as of age 30 for five years had an ICER of 72,000 EUR/LYG; the ICER for using oral contraceptives for five years as of age 50 was 450,000 EUR/LYG. Genetic testing for mutations in women at increased risk for carrying a mutation followed by risk-reducing surgery yielded ICERs below 40,000 EUR/QALY. Based on study results, preventive surgery in mutation carriers and genetic testing in women at increased risk for mutations are cost-effective. Except for high-risk women, screening using TVS and endometrial biopsy is not cost-effective and may lead to overtreatment. Model-based analyses indicate that future biomarker screening in women at increased risk for cancer may be cost-effective, dependent on high test accuracy and moderate test costs. Future research should reveal risk-adapted early detection and prevention strategies for endometrial cancer.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32664613
pii: cancers12071874
doi: 10.3390/cancers12071874
pmc: PMC7408795
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Horizon 2020
ID : 634570
Références
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2013 Aug;6(8):755-9
pubmed: 23842794
GMS Health Technol Assess. 2005 Nov 02;1:Doc03
pubmed: 21289924
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Oct;24(5):558-65
pubmed: 15386607
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Nov;103:356-387
pubmed: 30100160
Med Decis Making. 2012 Sep-Oct;32(5):690-700
pubmed: 22990084
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2011 Jan;4(1):9-22
pubmed: 21088223
J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Sep;4(5):485-504
pubmed: 26490020
JAMA. 1998 Nov 4;280(17):1510-7
pubmed: 9809732
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jun;200(6):640.e1-8
pubmed: 19380121
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Apr;49(6):1374-403
pubmed: 23485231
Value Health. 2012 Sep-Oct;15(6):812-20
pubmed: 22999130
Med Decis Making. 2012 Sep-Oct;32(5):678-89
pubmed: 22990083
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Jun;145(3):549-554
pubmed: 28390820
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jul;112(1):56-63
pubmed: 18591308
N Engl J Med. 2014 Aug 28;371(9):796-7
pubmed: 25162885
Clin Chem. 2014 Jan;60(1):111-21
pubmed: 24193118
Can J Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;53(4):267-74
pubmed: 18478830
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003 Jun;82(6):564-9
pubmed: 12780428
Practitioner. 2012 Mar;256(1749):13-5, 2
pubmed: 22662514
Value Health. 2012 Sep-Oct;15(6):796-803
pubmed: 22999128
Fam Cancer. 2005;4(3):233-7
pubmed: 16136383
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Oct 15;21(20):3867-74
pubmed: 14551306
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Apr;18(24):1-201, v-vi
pubmed: 24767431
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 19;354(3):261-9
pubmed: 16421367
Med Decis Making. 2012 Sep-Oct;32(5):667-77
pubmed: 22990082
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2018 Jun;126:92-99
pubmed: 29759571
Value Health. 2015 Dec;18(8):1138-51
pubmed: 26686801
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Apr;10(4):400-8
pubmed: 19341971
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2016;17(4):489-99
pubmed: 26629895
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;128(4):747-53
pubmed: 27607867
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 May;14(5):1132-42
pubmed: 15894663
BMJ. 2013 Mar 25;346:f1049
pubmed: 23529982
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jan;12(1):38-48
pubmed: 21147030
Cancer. 2008 Jul 15;113(2):326-35
pubmed: 18506736
Fam Cancer. 2011 Sep;10(3):535-43
pubmed: 21538078
Gastroenterology. 2011 Jan;140(1):73-81
pubmed: 20727894