Multiple cryoinjuries modulate the efficiency of zebrafish heart regeneration.
Animals
Animals, Genetically Modified
Cell Differentiation
Cell Lineage
Cell Proliferation
Fibrosis
Freezing
Heart
/ physiology
Heart Ventricles
/ physiopathology
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Microscopy, Fluorescence
Myocardium
/ metabolism
Myocytes, Cardiac
/ cytology
Neutrophils
/ metabolism
Phenotype
Regeneration
Transgenes
Wound Healing
Zebrafish
/ physiology
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 07 2020
14 07 2020
Historique:
received:
17
03
2020
accepted:
18
06
2020
entrez:
16
7
2020
pubmed:
16
7
2020
medline:
23
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Zebrafish can regenerate their damaged hearts throughout their lifespan. It is, however, unknown, whether regeneration remains effective when challenged with successive cycles of cardiac damage in the same animals. Here, we assessed ventricular restoration after two, three and six cryoinjuries interspaced by recovery periods. Using transgenic cell-lineage tracing analysis, we demonstrated that the second cryoinjury damages the regenerated area from the preceding injury, validating the experimental approach. We identified that after multiple cryoinjuries, all hearts regrow a thickened myocardium, similarly to hearts after one cryoinjury. However, the efficiency of scar resorption decreased with the number of repeated cryoinjuries. After six cryoinjuries, all examined hearts failed to completely resolve the fibrotic tissue, demonstrating reduced myocardial restoration. This phenotype was associated with enhanced recruitment of neutrophils and decreased cardiomyocyte proliferation and dedifferentiation at the early regenerative phase. Furthermore, we found that each repeated cryoinjury increased the accumulation of collagen at the injury site. Our analysis demonstrates that the cardiac regenerative program can be successfully activated many times, despite a persisting scar in the wounded area. This finding provides a new perspective for regenerative therapies, aiming in stimulation of organ regeneration in the presence of fibrotic tissue in mammalian models and humans.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32665622
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68200-1
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-68200-1
pmc: PMC7360767
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
11551Subventions
Organisme : Swiss National Science Foundation
ID : 310030_179213
Pays : Switzerland
Références
Lenhoff, H. & Lenhoff, S. A History of Regenertion Research: Milestones in the Evolution of a Science 47–66 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991).
Vogg, M. C., Galliot, B. & Tsiairis, C. D. Model systems for regeneration: salamanders. Development 146, dev177212. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.177212 (2019).
doi: 10.1242/dev.177212
pubmed: 31676551
Reddien, P. W. The cellular and molecular basis for planarian regeneration. Cell 175, 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.021 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.021
pubmed: 30290140
Ribeiro, R. P., Bleidorn, C. & Aguado, M. T. Regeneration mechanisms in Syllidae (Annelida). Regeneration 5, 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/reg2.98 (2018).
doi: 10.1002/reg2.98
pubmed: 29721325
pmcid: 5911452
Blanchoud, S., Rinkevich, B. & Wilson, M. J. Whole-body regeneration in the colonial tunicate Botrylloides leachii. Res Probl Cell Differ 65, 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92486-1_16 (2018).
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-92486-1_16
Kollros, J. J. Limb regeneration in anuran tadpoles following repeated amputations. J Exp Zool 232, 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402320209 (1984).
doi: 10.1002/jez.1402320209
pubmed: 6334127
Eguchi, G. et al. Regenerative capacity in newts is not altered by repeated regeneration and ageing. Nat Commun 2, 384. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1389 (2011).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms1389
pubmed: 21750538
pmcid: 3144589
Azevedo, A. S., Grotek, B., Jacinto, A., Weidinger, G. & Saude, L. The regenerative capacity of the zebrafish caudal fin is not affected by repeated amputations. PLoS ONE 6, e22820. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022820 (2011).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022820
pubmed: 21829525
pmcid: 3145768
Michalopoulos, G. K. & DeFrances, M. C. Liver regeneration. Science 276, 60. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5309.60 (1997).
doi: 10.1126/science.276.5309.60
pubmed: 9082986
Bryant, D. M. et al. Identification of regenerative roadblocks via repeat deployment of limb regeneration in axolotls. npj Regen. Med. 2, 30. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-017-0034-z (2017).
doi: 10.1038/s41536-017-0034-z
pubmed: 29302364
pmcid: 5677943
Ranski, A. H., Kramer, A. C., Morgan, G. W., Perez, J. L. & Thummel, R. Characterization of retinal regeneration in adult zebrafish following multiple rounds of phototoxic lesion. PeerJ 6, e5646–e5646. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5646 (2018).
doi: 10.7717/peerj.5646
pubmed: 30258730
pmcid: 6151257
LeClair, E. E. & Topczewski, J. Development and regeneration of the zebrafish maxillary barbel: a novel study system for vertebrate tissue growth and repair. PLoS ONE 5, e8737–e8737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008737 (2010).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008737
pubmed: 20090899
pmcid: 2806924
González-Rosa, J. M., Burns, C. E. & Burns, C. G. Zebrafish heart regeneration: 15 years of discoveries. Regeneration 4, 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/reg2.83 (2017).
doi: 10.1002/reg2.83
pubmed: 28979788
pmcid: 5617908
Karra, R. & Poss, K. D. Redirecting cardiac growth mechanisms for therapeutic regeneration. J. Clin. Investig. 127, 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci89786 (2017).
doi: 10.1172/jci89786
pubmed: 28145902
Jazwinska, A. & Sallin, P. Regeneration versus scarring in vertebrate appendages and heart. J. Pathol. 238, 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.4644 (2016).
doi: 10.1002/path.4644
pubmed: 26414617
Mokalled, M. H. & Poss, K. D. A regeneration toolkit. Dev. Cell 47, 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2018.10.015 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.10.015
pubmed: 30399333
pmcid: 6373444
Gonzalez-Rosa, J. M., Martin, V., Peralta, M., Torres, M. & Mercader, N. Extensive scar formation and regression during heart regeneration after cryoinjury in zebrafish. Development 138, 1663–1674. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.060897 (2011).
doi: 10.1242/dev.060897
pubmed: 21429987
Chablais, F., Veit, J., Rainer, G. & Jazwinska, A. The zebrafish heart regenerates after cryoinjury-induced myocardial infarction. BMC Dev. Biol. 11, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-11-21 (2011).
doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-11-21
pubmed: 21473762
pmcid: 3078894
Schnabel, K., Wu, C. C., Kurth, T. & Weidinger, G. Regeneration of cryoinjury induced necrotic heart lesions in zebrafish is associated with epicardial activation and cardiomyocyte proliferation. PLoS ONE 6, e18503. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018503 (2011).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018503
pubmed: 21533269
pmcid: 3075262
Kikuchi, K. et al. Primary contribution to zebrafish heart regeneration by gata4(+) cardiomyocytes. Nature 464, 601–605. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08804 (2010).
doi: 10.1038/nature08804
pubmed: 20336144
pmcid: 3040215
Jopling, C. et al. Zebrafish heart regeneration occurs by cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation and proliferation. Nature 464, 606–609. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08899 (2010).
doi: 10.1038/nature08899
pubmed: 20336145
pmcid: 2846535
Pfefferli, C. & Jaźwińska, A. The careg element reveals a common regulation of regeneration in the zebrafish myocardium and fin. Nat. Commun. 8, 15151. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15151 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms15151
pubmed: 28466843
pmcid: 5418624
Sánchez-Iranzo, H. et al. Tbx5a lineage tracing shows cardiomyocyte plasticity during zebrafish heart regeneration. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02650-6 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02650-6
pubmed: 29382818
pmcid: 5789846
Pfefferli, C. & Jaźwińska, A. Lymphatic vessels help mend broken hearts. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52200 (2019).
doi: 10.7554/eLife.52200
pubmed: 31709981
pmcid: 6845218
Lai, S.-L., Marín-Juez, R. & Stainier, D. Y. R. Immune responses in cardiac repair and regeneration: a comparative point of view. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 76, 1365–1380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-018-2995-5 (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s00018-018-2995-5
pubmed: 30578442
Cao, J. & Poss, K. D. The epicardium as a hub for heart regeneration. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 15, 631–647. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-018-0046-4 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41569-018-0046-4
pubmed: 29950578
pmcid: 6143401
Tzahor, E. & Poss, K. D. Cardiac regeneration strategies: staying young at heart. Science 356, 1035–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5894 (2017).
doi: 10.1126/science.aam5894
pubmed: 28596337
pmcid: 5614484
Fernandez, C. E., Bakovic, M. & Karra, R. Endothelial contributions to zebrafish heart regeneration. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 5, 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd5040056 (2018).
doi: 10.3390/jcdd5040056
pmcid: 6306804
Chablais, F. & Jazwinska, A. The regenerative capacity of the zebrafish heart is dependent on TGFbeta signaling. Development 139, 1921–1930. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.078543 (2012).
doi: 10.1242/dev.078543
pubmed: 22513374
Harrison, M. R. M. et al. Late developing cardiac lymphatic vasculature supports adult zebrafish heart function and regeneration. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42762 (2019).
doi: 10.7554/eLife.42762
pubmed: 31793434
pmcid: 6890463
Sallin, P. & Jaźwińska, A. Acute stress is detrimental to heart regeneration in zebrafish. Open Biol. 6, 160012. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.160012 (2016).
doi: 10.1098/rsob.160012
pubmed: 27030176
pmcid: 4821245
Sánchez-Iranzo, H. et al. Transient fibrosis resolves via fibroblast inactivation in the regenerating zebrafish heart. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115, 4188–4193. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716713115 (2018).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1716713115
pubmed: 29610343
Poss, K. D., Wilson, L. G. & Keating, M. T. Heart regeneration in zebrafish. Science 298, 2188–2190 (2002).
doi: 10.1126/science.1077857
Wang, J., Karra, R., Dickson, A. L. & Poss, K. D. Fibronectin is deposited by injury-activated epicardial cells and is necessary for zebrafish heart regeneration. Dev. Biol. 382, 427–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.08.012 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.08.012
pubmed: 23988577
Marro, J., Pfefferli, C., de Preux Charles, A. S., Bise, T. & Jazwinska, A. Collagen XII contributes to epicardial and connective tissues in the zebrafish heart during ontogenesis and regeneration. PLoS ONE 11, e0165497. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165497 (2016).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165497
pubmed: 27783651
pmcid: 5081208
Manalo, T. et al. Differential lectin binding patterns identify distinct heart regions in giant danio (Devario aequipinnatus) and zebrafish (Danio rerio) hearts. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 64, 687–714. https://doi.org/10.1369/0022155416667928 (2016).
doi: 10.1369/0022155416667928
pubmed: 27680670
pmcid: 5084522
Wood, W. & Martin, P. Macrophage functions in tissue patterning and disease: new insights from the fly. Dev. Cell 40, 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2017.01.001 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.01.001
pubmed: 28171746
pmcid: 5300050
Bise, T., de Preux Charles, A.-S. & Jaźwińska, A. Ciliary neurotrophic factor stimulates cardioprotection and the proliferative activity in the adult zebrafish heart. npj Regener. Med. 4, 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-019-0064-9 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41536-019-0064-9
Rottbauer, W. et al. Reptin and pontin antagonistically regulate heart growth in zebrafish embryos. Cell 111, 661–672 (2002).
doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01112-1
Ryu, S. & Driever, W. Minichromosome maintenance proteins as markers for proliferation zones during embryogenesis. Cell Cycle 5, 1140–1142. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.5.11.2779 (2014).
doi: 10.4161/cc.5.11.2779
de Preux Charles, A. S., Bise, T., Baier, F., Sallin, P. & Jazwinska, A. Preconditioning boosts regenerative programmes in the adult zebrafish heart. Open Biol. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.160101 (2016).
doi: 10.1098/rsob.160101
pubmed: 27440424
pmcid: 4967830
de Preux Charles, A. S., Bise, T., Baier, F., Marro, J. & Jazwinska, A. Distinct effects of inflammation on preconditioning and regeneration of the adult zebrafish heart. Open Biol. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.160102 (2016).
doi: 10.1098/rsob.160102
pubmed: 27440424
pmcid: 4967830
Sallin, P., de Preux Charles, A. S., Duruz, V., Pfefferli, C. & Jazwinska, A. A dual epimorphic and compensatory mode of heart regeneration in zebrafish. Dev. Biol. 399, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.12.002 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.12.002
pubmed: 25557620
Jaźwińska, A. & Blanchoud, S. Towards deciphering variations of heart regeneration in fish. Curr. Physiol. 14, 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cophys.2019.11.007 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.cophys.2019.11.007
Sun, Y. & Weber, K. T. Infarct scar: a dynamic tissue. Cardiovasc. Res. 46, 250–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-6363(00)00032-8 (2000).
doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(00)00032-8
pubmed: 10773228
Vivien, C. J., Hudson, J. E. & Porrello, E. R. Evolution, comparative biology and ontogeny of vertebrate heart regeneration. npj Regen. Med. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjregenmed.2016.12 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/npjregenmed.2016.12
pubmed: 29302337
pmcid: 5744704
Chiquet, M., Birk, D. E., Bonnemann, C. G. & Koch, M. Collagen XII: Protecting bone and muscle integrity by organizing collagen fibrils. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 53, 51–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2014.04.020 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2014.04.020
pubmed: 24801612
pmcid: 4119597
Wehner, D. et al. Wnt signaling controls pro-regenerative Collagen XII in functional spinal cord regeneration in zebrafish. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00143-0 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00143-0
pubmed: 28743881
pmcid: 5526933
Bader, H. L. et al. Zebrafish collagen XII is present in embryonic connective tissue sheaths (fascia) and basement membranes. Matrix Biol. 28, 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2008.09.580 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2008.09.580
pubmed: 18983916
Nauroy, P. et al. Gene profile of zebrafish fin regeneration offers clues to kinetics, organization and biomechanics of basement membrane. Matrix Biol. 75–76, 82–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2018.07.005 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2018.07.005
pubmed: 30031067
González-Rosa, J. M. et al. Use of echocardiography reveals reestablishment of ventricular pumping efficiency and partial ventricular wall motion recovery upon ventricular cryoinjury in the zebrafish. PLoS ONE 9, e115604–e115604. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115604 (2014).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115604
pubmed: 25532015
pmcid: 4274112
Yu, J. K. et al. Cardiac regeneration following cryoinjury in the adult zebrafish targets a maturation-specific biomechanical remodeling program. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33994-8 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33994-8
pubmed: 30575797
pmcid: 6303312
Chablais, F. & Jazwinska, A. Induction of myocardial infarction in adult zebrafish using cryoinjury. J. Vis. Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/3666 (2012).
doi: 10.3791/3666
pubmed: 22546770
pmcid: 3466631
Bise, T. & Jaźwińska, A. Intrathoracic injection for the study of adult zebrafish heart. JoVE https://doi.org/10.3791/59724 (2019).
doi: 10.3791/59724
pubmed: 31157782
Redd, M. J., Kelly, G., Dunn, G., Way, M. & Martin, P. Imaging macrophage chemotaxis in vivo: studies of microtubule function in zebrafish wound inflammation. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 63, 415–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.20133 (2006).
doi: 10.1002/cm.20133