Is family history still underutilised? Exploring the views and experiences of primary care doctors in Malaysia.
Family history
Primary care
Qualitative
Risk assessment
Journal
Journal of community genetics
ISSN: 1868-310X
Titre abrégé: J Community Genet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101551501
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
02
03
2020
accepted:
08
07
2020
pubmed:
16
7
2020
medline:
16
7
2020
entrez:
16
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Family history has long been recognised as a non-invasive and inexpensive tool to identify individuals at risk of genetic conditions. Even in the era of evolving genetic and genomic technology, the role of family history in predicting individual risk for genetic testing and guiding in preventive interventions is still relevant, especially in low-resource countries. The aim of this study was to explore primary care doctors' views and experiences in family history taking and how they utilised family history in day-to-day clinical consultations in Malaysia. Four focus group discussions and six in-depth interviews involving 25 primary care doctors were conducted. Three themes emerged from the analysis: (1) primary care doctors considered family history as an important part of clinical assessment, (2) proactive versus reactive approach in collecting family history and (3) family history collection was variable and challenging. Family history was documented in either free text or pedigree depending on the perception of its appropriateness during the consultation. This study highlighted the need to improve the approach, documentation and the implementation of family history in the Malaysian primary care settings. Integrating family filing concept with built-in clinical decision support into electronic medical records is a potential solution in ensuring effective family history taking in primary care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32666196
doi: 10.1007/s12687-020-00476-2
pii: 10.1007/s12687-020-00476-2
pmc: PMC7475133
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
413-420Références
Genet Med. 2000 May-Jun;2(3):180-5
pubmed: 11256663
Genet Med. 2011 Jan;13(1):21-5
pubmed: 21057319
Fam Pract. 2008 Oct;25(5):334-40
pubmed: 18765407
Lancet. 2001 Apr 14;357(9263):1168-71
pubmed: 11323044
CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Mar-Apr;62(2):129-42
pubmed: 22261986
Fam Pract. 1999 Aug;16(4):420-5
pubmed: 10493715
Genet Med. 2003 Mar-Apr;5(2):84-91
pubmed: 12644777
Eur J Gen Pract. 2014 Jun;20(2):125-33
pubmed: 24160330
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Dec;28(12):1558-64
pubmed: 23588670
Am Fam Physician. 2005 Aug 1;72(3):441-8
pubmed: 16100858
Pediatrics. 2007 Sep;120 Suppl 2:S60-5
pubmed: 17767006
Fam Pract. 1999 Oct;16(5):468-74
pubmed: 10533942
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Mar;19(3):273-80
pubmed: 15009784
Adv Prev Med. 2013;2013:695763
pubmed: 23956863
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2015 Nov 20;4:60
pubmed: 26609359
Ann Fam Med. 2014 May-Jun;12(3):241-9
pubmed: 24821895
Fam Pract. 2005 Dec;22(6):663-9
pubmed: 16055464
J Genet Couns. 2008 Oct;17(5):424-33
pubmed: 18792771
Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan;34 Suppl 1:S11-61
pubmed: 21193625
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Aug;(186):1-135
pubmed: 19947667
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2005 May-Jun;50(3):189-96
pubmed: 15894996
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006 Apr 21;55(RR-6):1-23
pubmed: 16617292
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2006 Oct;18(10):447-56
pubmed: 16999709
Urology. 2002 Apr;59(4):546-50
pubmed: 11927311
Br J Gen Pract. 2010 May;60(574):e221-30
pubmed: 20423577
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Dec 14;56(25):e50-103
pubmed: 21144964
Ann Hum Biol. 2005 Mar-Apr;32(2):218-27
pubmed: 16096220
BMJ. 1993 Oct 2;307(6908):816-7
pubmed: 8401120
J Community Genet. 2012 Jul;3(3):175-83
pubmed: 22810887
Fam Pract. 2001 Apr;18(2):131-4
pubmed: 11264261
CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 May-Jun;58(3):130-60
pubmed: 18322143