A need-based, multi-level, cross-sectoral framework to explain variations in satisfaction of care needs among people living with dementia.
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Jul 2020
15 Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
17
12
2019
accepted:
09
06
2020
entrez:
17
7
2020
pubmed:
17
7
2020
medline:
31
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Provision of care and support for people with dementia and family carers is complex, given variation in how dementia manifests, progresses and affects people, co-morbidities associated with ageing, as well as individual preferences, needs, and circumstances. The traditional service-led approach, where individual needs are assessed against current service provision, has been recognised as unfit to meet such complexity. As a result, people with dementia and family members often fail to receive adequate support, with needs remaining unmet. Current research lacks a conceptual framework for explaining variation in satisfaction of care needs. This work develops a conceptual framework mapped onto the care delivery process to explain variations in whether, when and why care needs of people with dementia are met and to expose individual-, service-, system-level factors that enable or hinder needs satisfaction. Data collected through 24 in-depth interviews and two focus groups (10 participants) with people with dementia and family carers living in the North East of England (UK) were analysed thematically to develop a typology of care needs. The need most frequently reported for people with dementia (i.e. for support to go out and about) was analysed using themes stemming from the conceptual framework which combined candidacy and discrepancy theories. The operationalisation of the framework showed that satisfaction of the need to go out was first determined at the point of service access, affected by issues about navigation, adjudication, permeability, users' resistance to offers, users' appearance, and systems-level operating conditions, and, subsequently, at the point of service use, when factors related to service structure and care process determined (dis)satisfaction with service and, hence, further contributed to met or unmet need. The conceptual framework pinpoints causes of variations in satisfaction of care needs which can be addressed when designing interventions and service improvements.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Provision of care and support for people with dementia and family carers is complex, given variation in how dementia manifests, progresses and affects people, co-morbidities associated with ageing, as well as individual preferences, needs, and circumstances. The traditional service-led approach, where individual needs are assessed against current service provision, has been recognised as unfit to meet such complexity. As a result, people with dementia and family members often fail to receive adequate support, with needs remaining unmet. Current research lacks a conceptual framework for explaining variation in satisfaction of care needs. This work develops a conceptual framework mapped onto the care delivery process to explain variations in whether, when and why care needs of people with dementia are met and to expose individual-, service-, system-level factors that enable or hinder needs satisfaction.
METHODS
METHODS
Data collected through 24 in-depth interviews and two focus groups (10 participants) with people with dementia and family carers living in the North East of England (UK) were analysed thematically to develop a typology of care needs. The need most frequently reported for people with dementia (i.e. for support to go out and about) was analysed using themes stemming from the conceptual framework which combined candidacy and discrepancy theories.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The operationalisation of the framework showed that satisfaction of the need to go out was first determined at the point of service access, affected by issues about navigation, adjudication, permeability, users' resistance to offers, users' appearance, and systems-level operating conditions, and, subsequently, at the point of service use, when factors related to service structure and care process determined (dis)satisfaction with service and, hence, further contributed to met or unmet need.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The conceptual framework pinpoints causes of variations in satisfaction of care needs which can be addressed when designing interventions and service improvements.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32669104
doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05416-x
pii: 10.1186/s12913-020-05416-x
pmc: PMC7364635
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
657Subventions
Organisme : Health Foundation
ID : 1274233
Références
Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Oct;24(10):1571-80
pubmed: 22647248
Maturitas. 2011 Jan;68(1):34-46
pubmed: 21093996
Dementia (London). 2016 Sep;15(5):1112-23
pubmed: 25305279
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Jun;182:52-59
pubmed: 28412641
BMC Geriatr. 2015 May 13;15:59
pubmed: 25967742
Aging Ment Health. 2010 Jan;14(1):113-9
pubmed: 20155528
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;20(6):537-46
pubmed: 15920707
Gerontologist. 2016 Oct;56(5):e70-88
pubmed: 27102056
BMC Geriatr. 2013 May 24;13:51
pubmed: 23706150
Int Psychogeriatr. 2010 Jun;22(4):607-17
pubmed: 20214844
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jul 20;16(1):130
pubmed: 28728555
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Jan;173:81-87
pubmed: 27930919
Int Psychogeriatr. 2005 Sep;17(3):393-406
pubmed: 16252373
Dementia (London). 2016 Nov;15(6):1436-1456
pubmed: 25538123
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Nov;168:101-110
pubmed: 27643844
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 4;18(1):937
pubmed: 30514369
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Jul 26;6:35
pubmed: 16872487
Maturitas. 2015 Oct;82(2):162-9
pubmed: 26271710
Int Psychogeriatr. 2009 Oct;21(5):949-65
pubmed: 19602305
Health Technol Assess. 2002;6(32):1-244
pubmed: 12925269
Gerontologist. 2017 Apr 1;57(2):309-318
pubmed: 26608334
Int Psychogeriatr. 2007 Jun;19(3):559-92
pubmed: 17201993
Dementia (London). 2019 Feb;18(2):579-598
pubmed: 28114802
Gerontologist. 2018 Mar 19;58(2):e68-e77
pubmed: 29562360
Qual Health Res. 2012 Oct;22(10):1330-44
pubmed: 22785626
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;34(7):1095-1103
pubmed: 30950106
Med Care. 1981 Feb;19(2):127-40
pubmed: 7206846
Soc Sci Med. 1994 Feb;38(4):509-16
pubmed: 8184314
Ageing Soc. 2009 May 1;29(4):585-608
pubmed: 23814327
Health Soc Care Community. 2001 Nov;9(6):414-28
pubmed: 11846821
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 12;7(7):e016740
pubmed: 28706105
CMAJ. 2013 Oct 1;185(14):E669-80
pubmed: 24003093
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2018 Jul 10;4:288-296
pubmed: 30090849
Eval Program Plann. 1983;6(3-4):185-210
pubmed: 10299618
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Jan;30(1):5-14
pubmed: 28784193
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Feb 04;13:43
pubmed: 23379786
Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966 Jul;44(3):Suppl:166-206
pubmed: 5338568