Causal Inference in Audiovisual Perception.
Acoustic Stimulation
Adolescent
Adult
Auditory Perception
/ physiology
Brain
/ physiology
Brain Mapping
Discrimination, Psychological
/ physiology
Female
Frontal Lobe
/ physiology
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Multivariate Analysis
Parietal Lobe
/ physiology
Photic Stimulation
Prefrontal Cortex
/ physiology
Psychophysics
Sound Localization
/ physiology
Visual Perception
/ physiology
Young Adult
audiovisual
causal inference
fMRI
multisensory
multivariate
prefrontal cortex
Journal
The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience
ISSN: 1529-2401
Titre abrégé: J Neurosci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8102140
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 08 2020
19 08 2020
Historique:
received:
07
01
2020
revised:
26
06
2020
accepted:
01
07
2020
pubmed:
17
7
2020
medline:
5
1
2021
entrez:
17
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In our natural environment the senses are continuously flooded with a myriad of signals. To form a coherent representation of the world, the brain needs to integrate sensory signals arising from a common cause and segregate signals coming from separate causes. An unresolved question is how the brain solves this binding or causal inference problem and determines the causal structure of the sensory signals. In this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study human observers (female and male) were presented with synchronous auditory and visual signals at the same location (i.e., common cause) or different locations (i.e., separate causes). On each trial, observers decided whether signals come from common or separate sources(i.e., "causal decisions"). To dissociate participants' causal inference from the spatial correspondence cues we adjusted the audiovisual disparity of the signals individually for each participant to threshold accuracy. Multivariate fMRI pattern analysis revealed the lateral prefrontal cortex as the only region that encodes predominantly the outcome of observers' causal inference (i.e., common vs separate causes). By contrast, the frontal eye field (FEF) and the intraparietal sulcus (IPS0-4) form a circuitry that concurrently encodes spatial (auditory and visual stimulus locations), decisional (causal inference), and motor response dimensions. These results suggest that the lateral prefrontal cortex plays a key role in inferring and making explicit decisions about the causal structure that generates sensory signals in our environment. By contrast, informed by observers' inferred causal structure, the FEF-IPS circuitry integrates auditory and visual spatial signals into representations that guide motor responses.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32669354
pii: JNEUROSCI.0051-20.2020
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0051-20.2020
pmc: PMC7486655
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6600-6612Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 the authors.
Références
J Neurosci. 2007 May 16;27(20):5326-37
pubmed: 17507555
PLoS Biol. 2019 Apr 2;17(4):e3000210
pubmed: 30939128
Curr Biol. 2012 Jan 10;22(1):46-9
pubmed: 22177899
Brain. 1998 Jun;121 ( Pt 6):1013-52
pubmed: 9648540
Neuroimage. 2007 Mar;35(1):105-20
pubmed: 17239619
Hear Res. 2009 Dec;258(1-2):89-99
pubmed: 19393306
J Neurosci. 2013 May 15;33(20):8841-9
pubmed: 23678126
Neuroscience. 2006;139(4):1507-24
pubmed: 16529873
Neuroimage. 2010 Oct 15;53(1):1-15
pubmed: 20547229
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jun;10(6):278-85
pubmed: 16713325
J Vis. 2015;15(5):22
pubmed: 26067540
Neuroimage. 2010 Oct 15;53(1):119-31
pubmed: 20451631
Science. 1995 May 12;268(5212):889-93
pubmed: 7754376
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002 Jun;14(1):115-28
pubmed: 12063135
Nat Neurosci. 2009 Jun;12(6):718-24
pubmed: 19471271
J Neurosci. 2011 Aug 3;31(31):11338-50
pubmed: 21813693
Neuron. 2008 Jan 10;57(1):11-23
pubmed: 18184561
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Oct 24;97(22):11800-6
pubmed: 11050212
Brain Struct Funct. 2007 Sep;212(2):121-32
pubmed: 17717687
Cereb Cortex. 1991 Jan-Feb;1(1):1-47
pubmed: 1822724
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Oct;166(3-4):411-26
pubmed: 16151775
Neuroimage. 2007 Jul 15;36(4):1345-60
pubmed: 17513133
Nat Commun. 2019 Apr 23;10(1):1907
pubmed: 31015423
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Sep;158(2):252-8
pubmed: 15112119
Neuroimage. 2004 May;22(1):401-8
pubmed: 15110033
Curr Biol. 2016 Feb 22;26(4):509-14
pubmed: 26853368
Neuroreport. 2001 Jan 22;12(1):7-10
pubmed: 11201094
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 1;124(Pt A):876-886
pubmed: 26419391
J Neurosci. 2003 Jul 2;23(13):5799-804
pubmed: 12843284
Science. 2015 Jun 19;348(6241):1352-5
pubmed: 26089513
PLoS One. 2007 Sep 26;2(9):e943
pubmed: 17895984
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Sep;14(9):425-32
pubmed: 20705502
J Neurosci. 2010 Sep 15;30(37):12329-39
pubmed: 20844129
J Neurosci. 2005 May 18;25(20):5004-12
pubmed: 15901781
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Oct;25(10):3911-31
pubmed: 25452571
Percept Psychophys. 1981 Jun;29(6):578-84
pubmed: 7279586
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Jan;2(1):79-87
pubmed: 10195184
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Apr;9(4):292-303
pubmed: 18319728
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Apr 29;360(1456):815-36
pubmed: 15937014
Neuroimage. 1999 Feb;9(2):179-94
pubmed: 9931268
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 May;16(3):468-78
pubmed: 12706226
J Neurosci. 2010 Feb 17;30(7):2662-75
pubmed: 20164350
Neuron. 2019 Jun 5;102(5):1076-1087.e8
pubmed: 31047778
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 13;4:798
pubmed: 24294207
Percept Psychophys. 1996 Apr;58(3):351-62
pubmed: 8935896
J Neurosci. 2007 Oct 17;27(42):11431-41
pubmed: 17942738
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Aug;20(8):1829-42
pubmed: 19923200
J Neurosci. 2010 May 26;30(21):7434-46
pubmed: 20505110
Neuroimage. 2010 Oct 1;52(4):1592-602
pubmed: 20452443
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Jul 27;14(7):e1006110
pubmed: 30052625
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014 Feb;24(1):39-46
pubmed: 24492077
Neuron. 2007 Jan 18;53(2):279-92
pubmed: 17224408
J Neurosci. 2009 May 20;29(20):6490-9
pubmed: 19458220
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
pubmed: 9176953
J Neurosci. 2007 Jul 25;27(30):7881-7
pubmed: 17652579
Curr Biol. 2004 Feb 3;14(3):257-62
pubmed: 14761661
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Nov;13(11):488-95
pubmed: 19758835
Nature. 1996 May 2;381(6577):66-8
pubmed: 8609989
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2017 Jul 25;40:349-372
pubmed: 28772104
Front Neurosci. 2014 Jul 29;8:225
pubmed: 25120426
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010 Dec;20(6):731-40
pubmed: 21050743
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Feb;37(1):245-56
pubmed: 20731507
Hum Brain Mapp. 1994;1(3):210-20
pubmed: 24578041
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 20;108(51):E1441-50
pubmed: 22114191
J Neurosci. 2018 Aug 8;38(32):7143-7157
pubmed: 29959234
Nat Commun. 2016 Jun 06;7:11543
pubmed: 27265526
Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Jan;15(1):1-25
pubmed: 11747097
PLoS Biol. 2015 Feb 24;13(2):e1002073
pubmed: 25710328
eNeuro. 2018 Mar 8;5(1):
pubmed: 29527567
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e24016
pubmed: 21909378
Cereb Cortex. 2011 Apr;21(4):920-31
pubmed: 20810622
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
pubmed: 9176952
Neuroimage. 1999 Oct;10(4):385-96
pubmed: 10493897
Neuroimage. 2005 Jul 1;26(3):839-51
pubmed: 15955494
Cereb Cortex. 1995 Jul-Aug;5(4):323-37
pubmed: 7580125
Behav Brain Res. 2010 Jan 5;206(1):1-7
pubmed: 19686779
Cortex. 2019 Oct;119:74-88
pubmed: 31082680
PLoS One. 2009 May 27;4(5):e5664
pubmed: 19471644
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Feb 17;101(7):2167-72
pubmed: 14766982
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Feb 1;45(3):598-607
pubmed: 16530232
Curr Biol. 2007 Oct 9;17(19):1697-703
pubmed: 17884498
Nature. 2016 Jul 04;535(7611):285-8
pubmed: 27376476
Nature. 2002 Jan 24;415(6870):429-33
pubmed: 11807554
Cereb Cortex. 2001 Dec;11(12):1110-23
pubmed: 11709482
Cereb Cortex. 2008 Mar;18(3):598-609
pubmed: 17617658