A Factorial Survey Investigating the Effect of Disclosing Parental Intellectual Disability on Risk Assessments by Children's Social Workers in Child Safeguarding Scenarios.

England children’s social workers factorial survey parental intellectual disability risk assessment

Journal

British journal of social work
ISSN: 0045-3102
Titre abrégé: Br J Soc Work
Pays: England
ID NLM: 1271641

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Historique:
entrez: 17 7 2020
pubmed: 17 7 2020
medline: 17 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Literature suggests that, as parents, people with intellectual disabilities experience disproportionately high rates of child removal compared to other groups. A factorial survey of 191 children's social workers investigated the effect of disclosing parental intellectual disability (ID) upon risk assessments in a range of hypothetical child safeguarding scenarios. The case scenarios depicted a range of child safeguarding situations and parents' ID status was randomly included as an additional item of information. The data were fitted into a generalised ordinal logistic regression model. Findings indicate that when presented with scenarios considered to be less risky, the parental ID disclosure contributed significantly to a higher risk assessment score. However, when presented with scenarios that were considered more risky, the additional parental ID disclosure did not significantly contribute to a higher score. These findings indicate that the risk associated with parental ID is not fixed but relative to the situation in which it is encountered. The research concludes that in cases of low risk, the effect of parental ID is identified as a support need, whereas the lesser contribution of the disclosure to assessments of higher risk cases may indicate that parental ID is overlooked.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32669745
doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcz076
pii: bcz076
pmc: PMC7329189
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1185-1200

Subventions

Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers.

Références

J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013 Dec;57(12):1104-16
pubmed: 22998373
BMJ. 1991 Jun 22;302(6791):1481-2
pubmed: 1855013
Child Abuse Negl. 2003 Mar;27(3):235-51
pubmed: 12654323
Child Abuse Negl. 1991;15(4):389-401
pubmed: 1959072
J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012 Jun;37(2):121-30
pubmed: 22545776
Annu Rev Psychol. 1999;50:537-67
pubmed: 15012463
Child Abuse Negl. 2011 Aug;35(8):621-32
pubmed: 21862126
J Intellect Disabil. 2005 Jun;9(2):109-29
pubmed: 15937050
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jun;82(6):903-18
pubmed: 12051579

Auteurs

Ameeta Retzer (A)

National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.

Jane Kaye (J)

Centre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies (HeLEX), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.

Ron Gray (R)

National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.

Classifications MeSH