Is Office Laryngoscopy an Aerosol-Generating Procedure?
Adult
Aerosols
/ analysis
Air
/ analysis
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
COVID-19
/ transmission
Disease Transmission, Infectious
/ prevention & control
Female
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Laryngoscopy
/ adverse effects
Male
Particle Size
Patient Simulation
Phonation
Prospective Studies
Respiration
SARS-CoV-2
Speech
Flexible laryngoscopy
aerosol-generating procedures
droplet quantification
optical particle sizer
rigid laryngoscopy
Journal
The Laryngoscope
ISSN: 1531-4995
Titre abrégé: Laryngoscope
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8607378
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2020
11 2020
Historique:
received:
11
06
2020
accepted:
01
07
2020
pubmed:
17
7
2020
medline:
1
1
2021
entrez:
17
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aims of this work were 1) to investigate whether office laryngoscopy is an aerosol-generating procedure with an optical particle sizer (OPS) during clinical simulation on healthy volunteers, and 2) to critically discuss methods for assessment of aerosolizing potentials in invasive interventions. Prospective quantification of aerosol and droplet generation during clinical simulation of rigid and flexible laryngoscopy. Two healthy volunteers were recruited to undergo both flexible and rigid laryngoscopy. An OPS was used to quantify aerosols and droplets generated for four positive controls relative to ambient particles (speech, breathing, /e/ phonation, and /ae/ phonation) and for five test interventions relative to breathing and phonation (flexible laryngoscopy, flexible laryngoscopy with humming, flexible laryngoscopy with /e/ phonation, rigid laryngoscopy, and rigid laryngoscopy with /ae/ phonation). Particle counts in mean diameter size range from 0.3 to >10 μm were measured with OPS placed at 12 cm from the subject's nose/mouth. None of the laryngoscopy interventions (n = 10 each) generated aerosols above that produced by breathing or phonation. Breathing (n = 40, 1-3 μm, P = .016) and /ae/ phonation (n = 10, 1-3 μm, P = .022; 3-5 μm. P = .083; >5 μm, P = .012) were statistically significant producers of aerosols and droplets. Neither speech nor /e/ phonation (n = 10 each) were associated with statistically significant aerosols and droplet generation. Using OPS to detect droplets and aerosols, we found that office laryngoscopy is likely not an aerosol-generating procedure. Despite its prior use in otolaryngological literature, an OPS has intrinsic limitations. Our study should be complemented with more sophisticated methods of droplet distribution measurement. 3 Laryngoscope, 130:2637-2642, 2020.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32671840
doi: 10.1002/lary.28973
pmc: PMC7404375
doi:
Substances chimiques
Aerosols
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2637-2642Informations de copyright
© 2020 American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society Inc, The Triological Society and American Laryngological Association (ALA).
Références
J Aerosol Sci. 2009 Feb;40(2):122-133
pubmed: 32287373
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2014;11(6):388-96
pubmed: 24275016
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2005 Mar;2(3):143-54
pubmed: 15764538
J Hyg (Lond). 1946 Sep;44(6):471-9
pubmed: 20475760
J Aerosol Med. 2007 Winter;20(4):484-94
pubmed: 18158720
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Sep;163(3):465-470
pubmed: 32452739
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1837-1838
pubmed: 32215590
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Oct;14(46):131-172
pubmed: 20923611
BMC Pulm Med. 2012 Mar 21;12:11
pubmed: 22436202
J Am Dent Assoc. 1994 May;125(5):579-84
pubmed: 8195499
Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Nov;12(11):1657-62
pubmed: 17283614
Viruses. 2019 Oct 12;11(10):
pubmed: 31614743
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Oct 15;65(8):1335-1341
pubmed: 29017249
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 20;9(1):2348
pubmed: 30787335
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jun;162(6):813-815
pubmed: 32312166
PLoS Pathog. 2013 Mar;9(3):e1003205
pubmed: 23505369
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56278
pubmed: 23418548
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2061-2063
pubmed: 32294341
J Dent Res. 1969 Jan-Feb;48(1):49-56
pubmed: 4887699
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35797
pubmed: 22563403