Machine Learning Models for Diagnosing Glaucoma from Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Maps.
Journal
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
ISSN: 2589-4196
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmol Glaucoma
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101730510
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
09
05
2019
revised:
16
07
2019
accepted:
14
08
2019
entrez:
17
7
2020
pubmed:
1
1
2019
medline:
1
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the diagnostic accuracy of multiple machine learning models using full retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness maps in detecting glaucoma. Case-control study. A total of 93 eyes from 69 patients with glaucoma and 128 eyes from 128 age- and sex-matched healthy controls from the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study (LALES), a large population-based, longitudinal cohort study consisting of Latino participants aged ≥40 years residing in El Puente, California. The 6×6-mm RNFL thickness maps centered on the optic nerve head (Cirrus 4000; Zeiss, Dublin, CA) were supplied to 4 different machine learning algorithms. These models included 2 conventional machine learning algorithms, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and 2 convolutional neural nets, ResNet-18 and GlaucomaNet, which was a custom-made deep learning network. All models were tested with 5-fold cross validation. Area under the curve (AUC) statistics to assess diagnostic accuracy of each model compared with conventional average circumpapillary RNFL thickness. All 4 models achieved similarly high diagnostic accuracies, with AUC values ranging from 0.91 to 0.92. These values were significantly higher than those for average circumpapillary RNFL thickness, which had an AUC of 0.76 in the same patient population. Superior diagnostic performance was achieved with both conventional machine learning and convolutional neural net models compared with circumpapillary RNFL thickness. This supports the importance of the spatial structure of RNFL thickness map data in diagnosing glaucoma and further efforts to optimize our use of this data.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32672575
pii: S2589-4196(19)30255-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2019.08.004
pmc: PMC7368087
mid: NIHMS1538200
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
422-428Subventions
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : K23 EY027855
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : U10 EY011753
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Ophthalmology. 2010 Sep;117(9):1684-91
pubmed: 20663563
PLoS One. 2017 May 23;12(5):e0177726
pubmed: 28542342
JAMA. 2014 May 14;311(18):1901-11
pubmed: 24825645
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016 May;35(5):1285-98
pubmed: 26886976
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Nov 1;57(14):5882-5891
pubmed: 27802518
JAMA. 2016 Dec 13;316(22):2402-2410
pubmed: 27898976
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jun 15;:0
pubmed: 22729440
Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul;98 Suppl 2:ii15-9
pubmed: 24357497
Ophthalmology. 2004 Jun;111(6):1121-31
pubmed: 15177962
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Dec;48(12):5582-90
pubmed: 18055807
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018 Jul 18;7(4):7
pubmed: 30034951
Acta Ophthalmol. 2010 Feb;88(1):44-52
pubmed: 20064122
Ophthalmology. 2004 Aug;111(8):1439-48
pubmed: 15288969
J Ophthalmol. 2013;2013:789129
pubmed: 24369495
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Oct;120(10):1268-79
pubmed: 12365904