Towards precision dosing of vancomycin in critically ill patients: an evaluation of the predictive performance of pharmacometric models in ICU patients.

Bayesian forecasting Critically ill Population pharmacokinetic models Precision dosing Predictive performance Therapeutic drug monitoring Vancomycin

Journal

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
ISSN: 1469-0691
Titre abrégé: Clin Microbiol Infect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9516420

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Jul 2020
Historique:
received: 07 04 2020
revised: 12 06 2020
accepted: 01 07 2020
pubmed: 17 7 2020
medline: 17 7 2020
entrez: 17 7 2020
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Vancomycin dose recommendations depend on population pharmacokinetic models. These models have not been adequately assessed in critically ill patients, who exhibit large pharmacokinetic variability. This study evaluated model predictive performance in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and identified factors influencing model performance. Retrospective data from ICU adult patients administered vancomycin were used to evaluate model performance to predict serum concentrations a priori (no observed concentrations included) or with Bayesian forecasting (using concentration data). Predictive performance was determined using relative bias (rBias, bias) and relative root mean squared error (rRMSE, precision). Models were considered clinically acceptable if rBias was between ±20% and 95% confidence intervals included zero. Models were compared with rRMSE; no threshold was used. The influence of clinical factors on model performance was assessed with multiple linear regression. Data from 82 patients were used to evaluate 12 vancomycin models. The Goti model was the only clinically acceptable model with both a priori (rBias 3.4%) and Bayesian forecasting (rBias 1.5%) approaches. Bayesian forecasting was superior to a priori prediction, improving with the use of more recent concentrations. Four models were clinically acceptable with Bayesian forecasting. Renal replacement therapy status (p < 0.001) and sex (p = 0.007) significantly influenced the performance of the Goti model. The Goti, Llopis and Roberts models are clinically appropriate to inform vancomycin dosing in critically ill patients. Implementing the Goti model in dose prediction software could streamline dosing across both ICU and non-ICU patients, considering it is also the most accurate model in non-ICU patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32673799
pii: S1198-743X(20)30388-8
doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.07.005
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

C B Cunio (CB)

Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia; School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

D W Uster (DW)

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

J E Carland (JE)

Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, Univeristy of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Centre of Applied Medical Research, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

H Buscher (H)

St Vincent's Clinical School, Univeristy of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Centre of Applied Medical Research, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Z Liu (Z)

Stats Central, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

J Brett (J)

Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, Univeristy of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

M Stefani (M)

Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, Univeristy of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

G R D Jones (GRD)

St Vincent's Clinical School, Univeristy of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; SydPath, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

R O Day (RO)

Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia; School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, Univeristy of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Centre of Applied Medical Research, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

S G Wicha (SG)

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

S L Stocker (SL)

Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, Univeristy of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Centre of Applied Medical Research, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: sophie.stocker@svha.org.au.

Classifications MeSH