Milk production, nitrogen utilization, and methane emissions of dairy cows grazing grass, forb, and legume-based pastures.
methane emission
nitrogen partitioning
sustainability
tannins
Journal
Journal of animal science
ISSN: 1525-3163
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003002
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jul 2020
01 Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
26
05
2020
accepted:
13
07
2020
pubmed:
17
7
2020
medline:
28
11
2020
entrez:
17
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Achieving high animal productivity without degrading the environment is the primary target in pasture-based dairy farming. This study investigated the effects of changing the forage base in spring from grass-clover pastures to forb or legume-based pastures on milk yield, N utilization, and methane emissions of Jersey cows in Western Oregon. Twenty-seven mid-lactation dairy cows were randomly assigned to one of three pasture treatments: grass-clover-based pasture composed of festulolium, tall fescue, orchardgrass, and white clover (Grass); forb-based pasture composed of chicory, plantain, and white clover (Forb); and legume-based pasture composed of red clover, bird's-foot trefoil, berseem clover, and balansa clover (Legume). Pastures were arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replicates (i.e., blocks) with each replicate grazed by a group of three cows. Production and nutritive quality of the forages, animal performance, milk components, nitrogen partitioning, and methane emissions were measured. Feed quality and dry matter intake (DMI) of cows were greater (P ≤ 0.05) for Legume and Forb vs. Grass, with consequent greater milk and milk solids yields (P < 0.01). Cows grazing Forb also had more (P < 0.01) lactose and linoleic acid in milk compared with cows grazing the other pastures, and less (P = 0.04) somatic cell counts compared with Grass. Cows grazing Forb had substantially less (P < 0.01) N in urine, milk, and blood compared with cows grazing the other pastures, with not only a greater (P < 0.01) efficiency of N utilization for milk synthesis calculated using milk urea nitrogen but also a larger (P < 0.01) fecal N content, indicating a shift of N from urine to feces. Both Forb and Legume had a diuretic effect on cows, as indicated by the lower (P < 0.01) creatinine concentration in urine compared with Grass. Methane emissions tended to be less (P = 0.07) in cows grazed on Forb vs. the other pastures. The results indicate that Forb pasture can support animal performance, milk quality, and health comparable to Legume pasture; however, Forb pasture provides the additional benefit of reduced environmental impact of pasture-based dairy production.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32674157
pii: 5872580
doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa220
pmc: PMC7455276
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Nitrogen
N762921K75
Methane
OP0UW79H66
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
J Dairy Sci. 1998 Dec;81(12):3182-213
pubmed: 9891265
Physiol Genomics. 2016 Apr;48(4):231-56
pubmed: 26812986
Animals (Basel). 2019 Oct 23;9(11):
pubmed: 31652766
J Anim Sci. 2018 Sep 7;96(9):3993-4001
pubmed: 29982473
J Biol Chem. 1957 May;226(1):497-509
pubmed: 13428781
J Dairy Sci. 2005 May;88(5):1778-84
pubmed: 15829671
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Jul;101(7):6675-6690
pubmed: 29153528
J Anim Sci. 2018 Sep 29;96(10):4398-4413
pubmed: 30032241
Nutrients. 2019 Mar 29;11(4):
pubmed: 30934976
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Feb;97(2):1005-15
pubmed: 24290818
J Chromatogr A. 2007 Aug 17;1161(1-2):207-13
pubmed: 17570379
J Agric Food Chem. 2002 Mar 27;50(7):1785-90
pubmed: 11902913
J Lipid Res. 1964 Oct;5:600-8
pubmed: 14221106
J Dairy Sci. 1992 Aug;75(8):2215-25
pubmed: 1401372
Transl Anim Sci. 2019 Jan 31;3(1):532-540
pubmed: 32704824
BMC Vet Res. 2016 Jan 06;12:4
pubmed: 26739274
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Apr 30;10:403
pubmed: 31114496
J Anim Sci. 2019 Jul 30;97(8):3286-3299
pubmed: 31242504
J Dairy Sci. 1991 Oct;74(10):3583-97
pubmed: 1660498
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Jan;96(1):141-9
pubmed: 23164232
J Agric Food Chem. 2013 Dec 11;61(49):11913-20
pubmed: 24262011
J Agric Food Chem. 2013 Mar 20;61(11):2669-78
pubmed: 23383722
J Dairy Sci. 2003 Jan;86(1):1-42
pubmed: 12613846
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2006 Feb 17;832(1):134-7
pubmed: 16298557
J Dairy Sci. 2004 Feb;87(2):386-98
pubmed: 14762082
Transl Anim Sci. 2019 Jun 05;3(2):829-841
pubmed: 32704849
J Dairy Sci. 1999 Dec;82(12):2697-708
pubmed: 10629817
Food Chem. 2017 Feb 15;217:483-489
pubmed: 27664662
Phytochemistry. 2000 Jun;54(5):539-48
pubmed: 10939359
Ir Vet J. 2009 Apr 01;62 Suppl 4:S15-20
pubmed: 22082340
N Z Vet J. 2004 Dec;52(6):320-31
pubmed: 15768132
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Feb;101(2):1804-1816
pubmed: 29174151
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Jan;102(1):236-245
pubmed: 30391180
Animal. 2013 Jun;7 Suppl 2:292-302
pubmed: 23739471