Simulation in the Continuing Professional Development of Academic Emergency Physicians: A Canadian National Survey.
Journal
Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare
ISSN: 1559-713X
Titre abrégé: Simul Healthc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101264408
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2021
01 Aug 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
18
7
2020
medline:
29
10
2021
entrez:
18
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Simulation is becoming a popular educational modality for physician continuing professional development (CPD). This study sought to characterize how simulation-based CPD (SBCPD) is being used in Canada and what academic emergency physicians (AEPs) desire in an SBCPD program. Two national surveys were conducted from March to June 2018. First, the SBCPD Needs Assessment Survey was administered online to all full-time AEPs across 9 Canadian academic emergency medicine (EM) sites. Second, the SBCPD Status Survey was administered by telephone to the department representatives (DRs)-simulation directors or equivalent-at 20 Canadian academic EM sites. Response rates for the SBCPD Needs Assessment and the SBCPD Status Survey were 40% (252/635) and 100% (20/20) respectively. Sixty percent of Canadian academic EM sites reported using SBCPD, although only 30% reported dedicated funding support. Academic emergency physician responses demonstrated a median annual SBCPD of 3 hours. Reported incentivization for SBCPD participation varied with AEPs reporting less incentivization than DRs. Academic emergency physicians identified time commitments outside of shift, lack of opportunities, and lack of departmental funding as their top barriers to participation, whereas DRs thought AEPs fear of peer judgment and inexperience with simulation were substantial barriers. Content areas of interest for SBCPD were as follows: rare procedures, pediatric resuscitation, and neonatal resuscitation. Lastly, interprofessional involvement in SBCPD was valued by both DRs and AEPs. Simulation-based CPD programs are becoming common in Canadian academic EM sites. Our findings will guide program coordinators in addressing barriers to participation, selecting content, and determining the frequency of SBCPD events.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32675734
pii: 01266021-202108000-00004
doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000482
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
246-253Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Society for Simulation in Healthcare.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Brown GM, Lang E, Patel K, et al. A national faculty development needs assessment in emergency medicine. CJEM 2016;18:161–182.
Cook DA, Blachman MJ, Price DW, et al. Educational technologies for physician continuous professional development: a national survey. Acad Med 2018;93:104–112.
Weinger MB, Banerjee A, Burden AR, et al. Simulation-based assessment of the management of critical events by board-certified anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology 2017;127:475–489.
Iitani Y, Tsuda H, Ito Y, et al. Simulation training is useful for shortening the decision-to-delivery interval in cases of emergent cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018;31:3128–3132.
Rusnock CF, Maxheimer EW, Oyama KF, Valencia VV. Simulation-based evaluation of the effects of patient load on mental workload of healthcare staff. Simul Healthc 2017;12:260–267.
Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011;306:978–988.
Rosen MA, Hunt EA, Pronovost PJ, Federowicz MA, Weaver SJ. In situ simulation in continuing education for the health care professions: a systematic review. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2012;32:243–254.
Sachdeva AK. Continuing professional development in the twenty-first century. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2016;36(Suppl 1):S8–S13.
Jensen JB, Torsher LC. Simulation and continuing professional development. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2015;53:60–69.
Dow AW, Salas E, Mazmanian PE. Improving quality in systems of care: solving complicated challenges with simulation-based continuing professional development. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2012;32:230–235.
Kilian BJ, Binder LS, Marsden J. The emergency physician and knowledge transfer: continuing medical education, continuing professional development, and self-improvement. Acad Emerg Med 2007;14:1003–1007.
Hobgood C, Anantharaman V, Bandiera G, et al. International Federation for Emergency Medicine Model Curriculum for emergency medicine specialists. Emerg Med Australas 2011;23:541–553.
Russell E, Hall AK, Hagel C, Petrosoniak A, Dagnone JD, Howes D. Simulation in Canadian postgraduate emergency medicine training - a national survey. CJEM 2018;20:132–141.
Gaba DM. The future vision of simulation in health care. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13(Suppl 1):i2–i10.
Dillman DASJD, Christian LM. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method . 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 2009.
EM Sim Cases. Available at: at http://emsimcases.com . Accessed September 12, 2019.
Translating Emergency Knowledge for Kids. Available at: https://trekk.ca/ . Accessed September 12, 2019.
McMillan HJ, Writer H, Moreau KA, et al. Lumbar puncture simulation in pediatric residency training: improving procedural competence and decreasing anxiety. BMC Med Educ 2016;16:198.
Wayne DB, Barsuk JH, O'Leary KJ, Fudala MJ, McGaghie WC. Mastery learning of thoracentesis skills by internal medicine residents using simulation technology and deliberate practice. J Hosp Med 2008;3:48–54.
Wayne DB, Didwania A, Feinglass J, Fudala MJ, Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC. Simulation-based education improves quality of care during cardiac arrest team responses at an academic teaching hospital: a case-control study. Chest 2008;133:56–61.
McGraw R, Chaplin T, McKaigney C, et al. Development and evaluation of a simulation-based curriculum for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization. CJEM 2016;18:405–413.
Jiang G, Chen H, Wang S, et al. Learning curves and long-term outcome of simulation-based thoracentesis training for medical students. BMC Med Educ 2011;11:39.
Wayne DB, Siddall VJ, Butter J, et al. A longitudinal study of internal medicine residents' retention of advanced cardiac life support skills. Acad Med 2006;81:S9–S12.
Ikenwilo D, Skatun D. Perceived need and barriers to continuing professional development among doctors. Health Policy 2014;117:195–202.
Petrosoniak A, Auerbach M, Wong AH, Hicks CM. In situ simulation in emergency medicine: moving beyond the simulation lab. Emerg Med Australas 2017;29:83–88.
Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, Hatala R, Zendejas B, Cook DA. Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training. Acad Med 2014;89:387–392.
Kalyuga S. Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educ Psychol Rev 2007;19:509–539.
Dent AW, Weiland TJ, Paltridge D. Australasian emergency physicians: a learning and educational needs analysis. Part four: CPD topics desired by emergency physicians. Emerg Med Australas 2008;20:260–266.
Rogers DA, Peterson DT, Ponce BA, White ML, Porterfield JR Jr. Simulation and faculty development. Surg Clin North Am 2015;95:729–737.
Sargeant J, Wong BM, Campbell CM. CPD of the future: a partnership between quality improvement and competency-based education. Med Educ 2018;52:125–135.
McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. A critical review of simulation-based mastery learning with translational outcomes. Med Educ 2014;48:375–385.
Josey K, Smith ML, Kayani AS, et al. Hospitals with more-active participation in conducting standardized in-situ mock codes have improved survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Resuscitation 2018;133:47–52.
Andreatta P, Saxton E, Thompson M, Annich G. Simulation-based mock codes significantly correlate with improved pediatric patient cardiopulmonary arrest survival rates. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2011;12:33–38.
Bond WF, Hui J, Fernandez R. The 2017 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference: catalyzing system change through healthcare simulation: systems, competency, and outcomes. Acad Emerg Med 2018;25:109–115.
Latkin CA, Edwards C, Davey-Rothwell MA, Tobin KE. The relationship between social desirability bias and self-reports of health, substance use, and social network factors among urban substance users in Baltimore, Maryland. Addict Behav 2017;73:133–136.
Sargeant J. Theories to aid understanding and implementation of interprofessional education. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2009;29:178–184.
Majmudar A, Jain AK, Chaudry J, Schwartz RW. High-performance teams and the physician leader: an overview. J Surg Educ 2010;67:205–209.
Cunningham CT, Quan H, Hemmelgarn B, et al. Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol 2015;15:32.
Kellerman SE, Herold J. Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature. Am J Prev Med 2001;20:61–67.