Assessment of Gram- and Viability-Staining Methods for Quantifying Bacterial Community Dynamics Using Flow Cytometry.

Gram staining Live/Dead staining anaerobic sorting flow cytometry population dynamics gut microbiota in vitro fermentation

Journal

Frontiers in microbiology
ISSN: 1664-302X
Titre abrégé: Front Microbiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101548977

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 10 03 2020
accepted: 04 06 2020
entrez: 18 7 2020
pubmed: 18 7 2020
medline: 18 7 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Over the past years, gut microbiota became a major field of interest with increasing reports suggesting its association with a large number of human diseases. In this context, there is a major interest to develop analysis tools allowing simple and cost-effective population pattern analysis of these complex ecosystems to follow changes over time. Whereas sequence-based metagenomics profiling is widely used for microbial ecosystems characterization, it still requires time and specific expertise for analysis. Flow cytometry overcomes these disadvantages, providing key information on communities within hours. In addition, it can potentially be used to select, isolate and cultivate specific bacteria of interest. In this study, we evaluated the culturability of strictly anaerobic bacteria that were stained with a classical Live/Dead staining, and then sorted using flow cytometry under anaerobic conditions. This sorting of "viable" fraction demonstrated that 10-80% of identified "viable" cells of pure cultures of strictly anaerobic bacteria were culturable. In addition, we tested the use of a combination of labeled vancomycin and Wheat Germ Agglutinin (WGA) lectin to discriminate Gram-positive from Gram-negative bacteria in complex ecosystems. After validation on both aerobic/anaerobic facultative and strictly anaerobic bacteria, the staining methods were applied on complex ecosystems, revealing differences between culture conditions and demonstrating that minor pH variations have strong impacts on microbial community structure, which was confirmed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. This combination of staining methods makes it possible to follow-up evolutions of complex microbial communities, supporting its future use as a rapid analysis tool in various applications. The flow cytometry staining method that was developed has the potential to facilitate the analysis of complex ecosystems by highlighting changes in bacterial communities' dynamics. It is assumed to be applicable as an efficient and fast approach to improve the control of processes linked to a wide range of ecosystems or known communities of bacterial species in both research and industrial contexts.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32676069
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01469
pmc: PMC7333439
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1469

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Duquenoy, Bellais, Gasc, Schwintner, Dore and Thomas.

Références

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jul 18;103(29):11033-8
pubmed: 16832063
J Microbiol Methods. 2017 Nov;142:79-82
pubmed: 28927972
Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2015;6:329-50
pubmed: 25705934
Biochemistry. 2017 Aug 1;56(30):3889-3893
pubmed: 28682052
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jul 10;10:1606
pubmed: 31354688
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 May;73(10):3283-90
pubmed: 17384309
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 May;69(5):2857-63
pubmed: 12732558
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2010 Jul;34(4):554-87
pubmed: 20337722
BMC Microbiol. 2015 Feb 18;15:36
pubmed: 25881030
Med Sci (Basel). 2018 Dec 14;6(4):
pubmed: 30558253
J Microbiol Methods. 2015 Oct;117:74-7
pubmed: 26187776
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Feb 5;99(3):1574-9
pubmed: 11830672
Cytometry. 1994 Jul 1;16(3):270-9
pubmed: 7924697
Mol Genet Genomics. 2009 Jul;282(1):1-15
pubmed: 19488786
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010 Mar;60(Pt 3):585-90
pubmed: 19654357
Gut Microbes. 2020 Jul 3;11(4):1116-1129
pubmed: 31918607
Cytometry A. 2012 Dec;81(12):1055-66
pubmed: 23081865
Methods. 2018 Feb 1;134-135:67-79
pubmed: 28842259
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 20;9(1):8897
pubmed: 31222022
Water Res. 2014 Oct 15;63:179-89
pubmed: 25000200
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jan;43(Database issue):D593-8
pubmed: 25414355
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Nov;100(21):9037-9051
pubmed: 27687990
J Appl Microbiol. 2018 Feb;124(2):572-584
pubmed: 29236340
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jul;71(7):3692-700
pubmed: 16000778
Bioresour Technol. 2016 Nov;220:566-571
pubmed: 27614579
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 14;12(2):e0171369
pubmed: 28196102
Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20
pubmed: 24695404
PeerJ. 2018 Jan 19;6:e4268
pubmed: 29372119
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Jul;64(7):2681-5
pubmed: 9647848
BMC Immunol. 2017 Jan 6;18(1):2
pubmed: 28061847
Nature. 2010 Mar 4;464(7285):59-65
pubmed: 20203603
J Food Drug Anal. 2019 Jul;27(3):615-622
pubmed: 31324278
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Jun;42(6):2548-57
pubmed: 15184433
Chem Soc Rev. 2013 May 21;42(10):4492-503
pubmed: 23598793
Microbiome. 2018 Feb 26;6(1):41
pubmed: 29482646
Front Microbiol. 2011 Sep 28;2:203
pubmed: 22046172
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Sep;46(5):479-493
pubmed: 28707337
mSphere. 2017 May 3;2(3):
pubmed: 28497116
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 02;11(8):e0160533
pubmed: 27483470
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002 Sep;52(Pt 5):1615-1620
pubmed: 12361264
Nat Microbiol. 2016 Nov 21;2:16215
pubmed: 27869789
Bioinformatics. 2011 Nov 1;27(21):2957-63
pubmed: 21903629
Science. 2011 Oct 7;334(6052):105-8
pubmed: 21885731
J Bacteriol. 2009 Oct;191(20):6203-10
pubmed: 19684130
J Microbiol Methods. 2016 Dec;131:172-180
pubmed: 27810378
Cytometry A. 2019 Jun;95(6):598-644
pubmed: 31207046
Eur J Immunol. 2016 May;46(5):1300-3
pubmed: 26909672
Nat Protoc. 2013 Jan;8(1):190-202
pubmed: 23288319
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017 May 3;9(17):15022-15030
pubmed: 28393523
J Agric Food Chem. 2018 Feb 7;66(5):1121-1130
pubmed: 29363966
Nature. 2012 Sep 13;489(7415):220-30
pubmed: 22972295
J Appl Microbiol. 2009 Mar;106(3):814-24
pubmed: 19187156
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2017 Oct;81(10):2009-2017
pubmed: 28782454
Mol Microbiol. 2020 Mar;113(3):659-671
pubmed: 31975449
PeerJ. 2016 Oct 18;4:e2584
pubmed: 27781170
J Bacteriol. 1990 Mar;172(3):1609-20
pubmed: 1689718
Front Microbiol. 2018 Aug 10;9:1844
pubmed: 30147684
J Bacteriol. 1974 May;118(2):606-15
pubmed: 4208136
Nature. 2017 Nov 23;551(7681):507-511
pubmed: 29143816
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Oct;6(8):1232-1244
pubmed: 30288286
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 10;12(7):e0180991
pubmed: 28700670
Lancet. 2019 Aug 3;394(10196):420-431
pubmed: 31379333
Nature. 2011 May 12;473(7346):174-80
pubmed: 21508958
Cytometry A. 2007 Aug;71(8):592-8
pubmed: 17421025
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Feb;72(2):1027-33
pubmed: 16461645
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 13;7(1):11450
pubmed: 28904372

Auteurs

Aurore Duquenoy (A)

MaaT Pharma, Lyon, France.

Samuel Bellais (S)

Bioaster, Institut de Recherche Technologique, Paris, France.

Cyrielle Gasc (C)

MaaT Pharma, Lyon, France.

Carole Schwintner (C)

MaaT Pharma, Lyon, France.

Joël Dore (J)

Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, MetaGenoPolis, AgroParisTech, MICALIS, Jouy-en-Josas, France.

Vincent Thomas (V)

Bioaster, Institut de Recherche Technologique, Paris, France.

Classifications MeSH