A comparison of screening tests for detection of high-grade cervical abnormalities in women living with HIV from Cameroon.
Journal
Infectious agents and cancer
ISSN: 1750-9378
Titre abrégé: Infect Agent Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101276559
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
30
05
2020
accepted:
02
07
2020
entrez:
18
7
2020
pubmed:
18
7
2020
medline:
18
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Women living with human immunodeficiency virus (WLWH), especially those living in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), are at increased risk of cervical cancer. The optimal cervical-cancer screening strategy for WLWH has not been determined. We therefore conducted a pilot study of screening methods in WLWH living in Limbe, Cameroon. Five-hundred sixty-six WLWH, aged 25-59 years, were enrolled. After self-collecting a cervicovaginal specimen, they underwent a pelvic exam, during which a provider also collected a cervical specimen and visual inspection after acetic acid (VIA) was performed. Both self- and provider-collected specimens were tested for high-risk HPV by the Xpert HPV Test (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), with the residual of the latter used for liquid-based cytology. Women testing HPV positive on either specimen and/or VIA positive were referred to colposcopy and biopsies. However, because of poor attendence for follow-up colposcopy for the screen positives due to civil strife and technical issues with biopsies, high-grade cytology and/or clinical diagnosis of cancer was used as the primary high-grade cervical abnormality endpoint. Clinical performances for high-grade cervical abnormality of HPV testing and VIA for screening WLWH, and the most carcinogenic HPV genotypes and/or VIA to triage high-risk HPV-positive WLWH, were evaluated. Four-hundred eighty-seven (86.0%) WLWH had results for HPV testing on both specimen, VIA, and cytology and were included in the analysis. Forty-nine (10.1%) had a high-grade cervical abnormality. HPV testing on provider- and self-collected specimens was more sensitive than VIA (95.9 and 91.8% vs. 43.8%, respectively, HPV testing was more sensitive but less specific than VIA for detection of high-grade cervical abnormality in WLWH. Improved triage methods for HPV-positive WLWH are needed. NCT04401670 (clinicaltrials.gov); retrospectively registered on May 26, 2020.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Women living with human immunodeficiency virus (WLWH), especially those living in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), are at increased risk of cervical cancer. The optimal cervical-cancer screening strategy for WLWH has not been determined. We therefore conducted a pilot study of screening methods in WLWH living in Limbe, Cameroon.
METHODS
METHODS
Five-hundred sixty-six WLWH, aged 25-59 years, were enrolled. After self-collecting a cervicovaginal specimen, they underwent a pelvic exam, during which a provider also collected a cervical specimen and visual inspection after acetic acid (VIA) was performed. Both self- and provider-collected specimens were tested for high-risk HPV by the Xpert HPV Test (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), with the residual of the latter used for liquid-based cytology. Women testing HPV positive on either specimen and/or VIA positive were referred to colposcopy and biopsies. However, because of poor attendence for follow-up colposcopy for the screen positives due to civil strife and technical issues with biopsies, high-grade cytology and/or clinical diagnosis of cancer was used as the primary high-grade cervical abnormality endpoint. Clinical performances for high-grade cervical abnormality of HPV testing and VIA for screening WLWH, and the most carcinogenic HPV genotypes and/or VIA to triage high-risk HPV-positive WLWH, were evaluated.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Four-hundred eighty-seven (86.0%) WLWH had results for HPV testing on both specimen, VIA, and cytology and were included in the analysis. Forty-nine (10.1%) had a high-grade cervical abnormality. HPV testing on provider- and self-collected specimens was more sensitive than VIA (95.9 and 91.8% vs. 43.8%, respectively,
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
HPV testing was more sensitive but less specific than VIA for detection of high-grade cervical abnormality in WLWH. Improved triage methods for HPV-positive WLWH are needed.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
NCT04401670 (clinicaltrials.gov); retrospectively registered on May 26, 2020.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32676125
doi: 10.1186/s13027-020-00311-w
pii: 311
pmc: PMC7353796
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04401670']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
45Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsThis study received Xpert HPV tests from Cepheid (Sunnyvale, CA, USA) at a reduced cost. Dr. Castle has received HPV tests and assays for research from Roche, Becton Dickinson, Cepheid, and Arbor Vita Corporation at a reduced or no cost.
Références
J Infect Dis. 2003 Aug 15;188(4):555-63
pubmed: 12898443
Lancet. 2007 Jul 7;370(9581):59-67
pubmed: 17617273
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013 Apr 1;62(4):405-13
pubmed: 23254153
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Aug;191(2):430-4
pubmed: 15343217
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Jan 18;98(2):100-9
pubmed: 16418512
AIDS. 2013 Nov 28;27(18):2909-19
pubmed: 23842133
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Jul;29(7):1447-1457
pubmed: 32385117
Int J Cancer. 2019 Apr 15;144(8):1941-1953
pubmed: 30350310
Lancet. 2012 Feb 25;379(9817):712
pubmed: 22364759
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2012 Apr;16(2):92-7
pubmed: 22126834
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 May 1;64(9):1228-1235
pubmed: 28199532
JAMA. 2002 Apr 24;287(16):2114-9
pubmed: 11966386
BMJ. 2018 Dec 5;363:k4823
pubmed: 30518635
Lancet HIV. 2018 Jan;5(1):e45-e58
pubmed: 29107561
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Oct 6;163(7):507-18
pubmed: 26436616
AIDS. 2017 Jan 14;31(2):273-285
pubmed: 27755107
Clin Lab Med. 2018 Mar;38(1):1-9
pubmed: 29412873
Lancet. 2007 Sep 8;370(9590):890-907
pubmed: 17826171
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2018 Jun;11(6):359-370
pubmed: 29618459
Int J Cancer. 2014 Aug 15;135(4):896-904
pubmed: 24391021
J Clin Virol. 2020 Jul;128:104445
pubmed: 32470891
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53494
pubmed: 23326441
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Mar;132(3):252-8
pubmed: 26868062
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 4;7(8):e015123
pubmed: 28780541
J Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 16;222(1):74-81
pubmed: 32050023
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Apr;14(4):e152-7
pubmed: 23561746
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 13;15(2):e0229086
pubmed: 32053659
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Sep 1;111(9):923-932
pubmed: 30629194
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Feb;8(2):e296-e304
pubmed: 31981559
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;95:176-182
pubmed: 32114194