Critical evaluation of the subcutaneous engraftments of hormone naïve primary prostate cancer.

Genomic fidelity hormone naïve patient-derived xenografts (PDX) primary prostate cancer

Journal

Translational andrology and urology
ISSN: 2223-4691
Titre abrégé: Transl Androl Urol
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101581119

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Historique:
entrez: 18 7 2020
pubmed: 18 7 2020
medline: 18 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are considered to better recapitulate the histopathological and molecular heterogeneity of human cancer than other preclinical models. Despite technological advances, PDX models from hormone naïve primary prostate cancer are scarce. We performed a detailed analysis of PDX methodology using a robust subcutaneous model and fresh tissues from patients with primary hormone naïve prostate cancer. Clinical prostate tumor specimens (n=26, Gleason score 6-10) were collected from robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies at Turku University Hospital (Turku, Finland), cut into pieces, and implanted subcutaneously into 84 immunodeficient mice. Engraftments and the adjacent material from prostatic surgical specimens were compared using histology, immunohistochemistry and DNA sequencing. The probability of a successful engraftment correlated with the presence of carcinoma in the implanted tissue. Tumor take rate was 41%. Surprisingly, mouse hormone supplementation inhibited tumor take rate, whereas the degree of mouse immunodeficiency did not have an effect. Histologically, the engrafted tumors closely mimicked their parental tumors, and the Gleason grades and copy number variants of the engraftments were similar to those of their primary tumors. Expression levels of androgen receptor, prostate-specific antigen, and keratins were retained in engraftments, and a detailed genomic analysis revealed high fidelity of the engraftments with their corresponding primary tumors. However, in the second or third passage of tumors, the carcinoma areas were almost completely replaced by benign tissue with frequent degenerative or metaplastic changes. Subcutaneous primary prostate engraftments preserve the phenotypic and genotypic landscape. Thus, they serve a potential model for personalized medicine and preclinical research but their use may be limited to the first passage.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are considered to better recapitulate the histopathological and molecular heterogeneity of human cancer than other preclinical models. Despite technological advances, PDX models from hormone naïve primary prostate cancer are scarce. We performed a detailed analysis of PDX methodology using a robust subcutaneous model and fresh tissues from patients with primary hormone naïve prostate cancer.
METHODS METHODS
Clinical prostate tumor specimens (n=26, Gleason score 6-10) were collected from robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies at Turku University Hospital (Turku, Finland), cut into pieces, and implanted subcutaneously into 84 immunodeficient mice. Engraftments and the adjacent material from prostatic surgical specimens were compared using histology, immunohistochemistry and DNA sequencing.
RESULTS RESULTS
The probability of a successful engraftment correlated with the presence of carcinoma in the implanted tissue. Tumor take rate was 41%. Surprisingly, mouse hormone supplementation inhibited tumor take rate, whereas the degree of mouse immunodeficiency did not have an effect. Histologically, the engrafted tumors closely mimicked their parental tumors, and the Gleason grades and copy number variants of the engraftments were similar to those of their primary tumors. Expression levels of androgen receptor, prostate-specific antigen, and keratins were retained in engraftments, and a detailed genomic analysis revealed high fidelity of the engraftments with their corresponding primary tumors. However, in the second or third passage of tumors, the carcinoma areas were almost completely replaced by benign tissue with frequent degenerative or metaplastic changes.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Subcutaneous primary prostate engraftments preserve the phenotypic and genotypic landscape. Thus, they serve a potential model for personalized medicine and preclinical research but their use may be limited to the first passage.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32676396
doi: 10.21037/tau.2020.03.38
pii: tau-09-03-1120
pmc: PMC7354344
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1120-1134

Informations de copyright

2020 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.03.38). PT reports grants from Academy of Finland, grants from Finnish Cancer Society, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Roche, outside the submitted work. PJK reports grants from Academy of Finland, during the conduct of the study. PH reports grants from State Research Funding to the responsibility area of Turku University Hospital, during the conduct of the study. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Références

BMC Cancer. 2017 Sep 7;17(1):635
pubmed: 28877700
Cancer Res. 2014 Feb 15;74(4):1272-83
pubmed: 24356420
BMC Med Genomics. 2019 Jul 1;12(1):92
pubmed: 31262303
Bioinformatics. 2012 Feb 1;28(3):423-5
pubmed: 22155870
Nat Genet. 2017 Nov;49(11):1567-1575
pubmed: 28991255
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 16;12(11):e0188228
pubmed: 29145505
Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14(28):2932-42
pubmed: 18991711
Prostate. 2015 May;75(6):585-92
pubmed: 25585936
Am J Pathol. 1996 Sep;149(3):1055-62
pubmed: 8780407
Nat Genet. 2000 Jan;24(1):23-5
pubmed: 10615122
Prostate. 2018 Dec;78(16):1262-1282
pubmed: 30073676
Prostate. 2015 Sep;75(13):1475-83
pubmed: 26177841
Prostate. 2017 May;77(6):654-671
pubmed: 28156002
Nat Rev Immunol. 2012 Nov;12(11):786-98
pubmed: 23059428
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014 Dec 15;79-80:222-37
pubmed: 25305336
J Cell Biochem. 2009 Jul 1;107(4):769-84
pubmed: 19415685
BMC Cancer. 2015 Dec 16;15:981
pubmed: 26673244
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2016 Apr;33(4):325-37
pubmed: 26873136
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec 07;8(4):200-9
pubmed: 21135887
Int J Cancer. 2016 Jul 1;139(1):140-52
pubmed: 26891277
Br J Cancer. 2017 Jun 27;117(1):51-55
pubmed: 28557974
Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2018 Feb 15;462(Pt A):17-24
pubmed: 28315377
Sci Transl Med. 2013 May 29;5(187):187ra71
pubmed: 23720582
Prostate. 2013 Sep;73(12):1316-25
pubmed: 23775398
J Immunol. 2005 May 15;174(10):6477-89
pubmed: 15879151
J Urol. 2004 Oct;172(4 Pt 1):1297-301
pubmed: 15371827
Oncotarget. 2018 Aug 24;9(66):32593-32608
pubmed: 30220968
J Urol. 2005 Feb;173(2):342-59
pubmed: 15643172
Nature. 2015 Feb 19;518(7539):422-6
pubmed: 25470049
BMC Cancer. 2009 Oct 12;9:362
pubmed: 19821979
Prostate. 2015 Oct;75(14):1526-37
pubmed: 26074274
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Jul 16;100(14):1022-36
pubmed: 18612129
Oncotarget. 2016 Aug 16;7(33):52810-52817
pubmed: 27429197
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2015 Oct;32(7):689-702
pubmed: 26231669
BMC Cancer. 2008 Mar 28;8:81
pubmed: 18371232
BMC Cancer. 2010 Oct 30;10:596
pubmed: 21034500
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 15;10(6):e0130340
pubmed: 26075720
Int J Cancer. 1982 Sep 15;30(3):371-6
pubmed: 7129682
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2013;43:11.10.1-11.10.33
pubmed: 25431634
Am J Pathol. 2010 Apr;176(4):1901-13
pubmed: 20167861
BMC Genomics. 2018 Jan 5;19(1):19
pubmed: 29304755
Int J Cancer. 2008 Jul 1;123(1):22-31
pubmed: 18386787

Auteurs

Maija Valta (M)

Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Division of Medicine, Turku City Hospital, Turku, Finland.

Jani Ylä-Pelto (J)

Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Department of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Yu Lan (Y)

Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Tiina Kähkönen (T)

Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Pekka Taimen (P)

Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

Peter J Boström (PJ)

Department of Urology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Otto Ettala (O)

Department of Urology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Sofia Khan (S)

Turku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.

Niklas Paulin (N)

Turku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.

Laura L Elo (LL)

Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Turku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.

Päivi J Koskinen (PJ)

Department of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Pirkko Härkönen (P)

Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
FICAN WEST Cancer Research Laboratory, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

Johanna Tuomela (J)

Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
FICAN WEST Cancer Research Laboratory, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

Classifications MeSH