Is interval appendectomy really needed? A closer look at neoplasm rates in adult patients undergoing interval appendectomy after complicated appendicitis.

Appendiceal abscess Appendiceal mass Appendiceal neoplasm Appendicitis Complicated appendicitis Interval appendectomy Phlegmon

Journal

Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2021
Historique:
received: 06 04 2020
accepted: 07 07 2020
pubmed: 18 7 2020
medline: 30 9 2021
entrez: 18 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The treatment algorithm for appendicitis is evolving, with recent interest in non-operative management. However, the safety of non-operative management for patients with complicated appendicitis has been questioned due to concern for increased risk of occult appendiceal neoplasm in this patient population. Our study aims to determine the rate of neoplasms discovered during interval appendectomy for patients with complicated appendicitis and determine the necessity of interval appendectomy. A retrospective chart review was conducted on interval appendectomies performed in adult patients for complicated appendicitis at our institution over a 9-year period. Interval appendectomy was defined as appendectomy delayed from initial presentation with appendicitis. Complicated appendicitis was defined as perforation, phlegmon, and/or abscess as seen on computed tomography at time of presentation. We identified 402 patients who underwent interval appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. A total of 36 appendiceal neoplasms were discovered on final pathology with an overall neoplasm rate of 9%. Patients with an appendiceal neoplasm were significantly older (56.6 years vs 45.1 years, p < 0.01). No patients under the age of 30 had a neoplasm. The rate of appendiceal neoplasms in patients 30 years and older was 11%. The rate for patients 50 years and older was 16%. For patients 80 years and older, the rate of appendiceal neoplasm was 43%. The risk of occult appendiceal neoplasm is low in patients under the age of 30; however, there was an 11% rate of appendiceal neoplasm in patients 30 years and older. The risk increases with increased age, with a 16% risk in patients 50 years and older. Given these findings, we recommend consideration of interval appendectomy in all patients 30 years and older with complicated appendicitis.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The treatment algorithm for appendicitis is evolving, with recent interest in non-operative management. However, the safety of non-operative management for patients with complicated appendicitis has been questioned due to concern for increased risk of occult appendiceal neoplasm in this patient population. Our study aims to determine the rate of neoplasms discovered during interval appendectomy for patients with complicated appendicitis and determine the necessity of interval appendectomy.
METHODS
A retrospective chart review was conducted on interval appendectomies performed in adult patients for complicated appendicitis at our institution over a 9-year period. Interval appendectomy was defined as appendectomy delayed from initial presentation with appendicitis. Complicated appendicitis was defined as perforation, phlegmon, and/or abscess as seen on computed tomography at time of presentation.
RESULTS
We identified 402 patients who underwent interval appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. A total of 36 appendiceal neoplasms were discovered on final pathology with an overall neoplasm rate of 9%. Patients with an appendiceal neoplasm were significantly older (56.6 years vs 45.1 years, p < 0.01). No patients under the age of 30 had a neoplasm. The rate of appendiceal neoplasms in patients 30 years and older was 11%. The rate for patients 50 years and older was 16%. For patients 80 years and older, the rate of appendiceal neoplasm was 43%.
CONCLUSION
The risk of occult appendiceal neoplasm is low in patients under the age of 30; however, there was an 11% rate of appendiceal neoplasm in patients 30 years and older. The risk increases with increased age, with a 16% risk in patients 50 years and older. Given these findings, we recommend consideration of interval appendectomy in all patients 30 years and older with complicated appendicitis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32676725
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07798-9
pii: 10.1007/s00464-020-07798-9
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3855-3860

Références

Ferris M, Quan S, Kaplan BS, Molodecky N, Ball CG, Chernoff GW, Bhala N, Ghosh S, Dixon E, Ng S, Kaplan GG (2017) The global incidence of appendicitis. Ann Surg 266:237–241. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002188
doi: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002188 pubmed: 28288060
Drake FT, Mottey NE, Farrokhi ET, Florence MG, Johnson MG, Mock C, Steele SR, Thirlby RC, Flum DR (2014) Time to appendectomy and risk of perforation in acute appendicitis. JAMA Surg 149:837. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2014.77
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.77 pubmed: 24990687 pmcid: 4160117
Körner H, Söndenaa K, Söreide JA, Andersen E, Nysted A, Lende TH, Kjellevold KH (1997) Incidence of acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: age-specific and sex-specific analysis. World J Surg 21:313–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002689900235
doi: 10.1007/s002689900235 pubmed: 9015177
Garst GC, Moore EE, Banerjee MN et al (2013) Acute appendicitis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74:32–36
doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318278934a
Wright GP, Mater ME, Carroll JT, Choy JS, Chung MH (2015) Is there truly an oncologic indication for interval appendectomy? Am J Surg 209:442–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.09.020
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.09.020 pubmed: 25543294
Wagner M, Tubre DJ, Asensio JA (2018) Evolution and current trends in the management of acute appendicitis. Surg Clin North Am 98:1005–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2018.05.006
doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2018.05.006 pubmed: 30243444
Tekin A, Kurtoğlu HC, Can I, Öztan S (2008) Routine interval appendectomy is unnecessary after conservative treatment of appendiceal mass. Colorectal Dis 10:465–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01377.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01377.x pubmed: 17868409
Kaminski A (2005) Routine interval appendectomy is not justified after initial nonoperative treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg 140:897. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.140.9.897
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.9.897 pubmed: 16175691
Lai H-W, Loong C-C, Chiu J-H, Chau G-Y, Wu C-W, Lui W-Y (2006) Interval appendectomy after conservative treatment of an appendiceal mass. World J Surg 30:352–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0128-4
doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0128-4 pubmed: 16479354
Willemsen PJ, Hoorntje LE, Eddes E-H, Ploeg RJ (2002) The need for interval appendectomy after resolution of an appendiceal mass questioned. Digest Surg 19:216–222. https://doi.org/10.1159/000064216
doi: 10.1159/000064216
Teixeira FJR, Netto SDDC, Akaishi EH, Utiyama EM, Menegozzo CAM, Rocha MC (2017) Acute appendicitis, inflammatory appendiceal mass and the risk of a hidden malignant tumor: a systematic review of the literature. World J Emerg Surg. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-017-0122-9
doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0122-9 pubmed: 28286544 pmcid: 5343298
Carpenter SG, Chapital AB, Merritt MV, Johnson DJ (2012) Increased risk of neoplasm in appendicitis treated with interval appendectomy: single-institution experience and literature review. Am Surg 78(3):339–343
doi: 10.1177/000313481207800344
Smeenk R, Velthuysen MV, Verwaal V, Zoetmulder F (2008) Appendiceal neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei: a population based study. Eur J Surg Oncol (EJSO) 34:196–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2007.04.002
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.04.002
Connor SJ, Hanna GB, Frizelle FA (1998) Appendiceal tumors. Dis Colon Rectum 41:75–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02236899
doi: 10.1007/bf02236899 pubmed: 9510314
Deakin D, Ahmed I (2007) Interval appendicectomy after resolution of adult inflammatory appendix mass—is it necessary? The Surgeon 5:45–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1479-666x(07)80111-9
doi: 10.1016/s1479-666x(07)80111-9 pubmed: 17313128
Tannoury J (2013) Treatment options of inflammatory appendiceal masses in adults. World J Gastroenterol 19:3942. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i25.3942
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i25.3942 pubmed: 23840138 pmcid: 3703180
Kumar S, Jain S (2004) Treatment of appendiceal mass: prospective randomized clinical trial. Indian J Gastroenterol 23:165–167
pubmed: 15598997
Youssef T, Badrawy A (2010) Prospective evaluation of the necessity of interval appendectomy after resolution of appendiceal mass. Egypt J Sur 29:85–89
Mällinen J, Rautio T, Grönroos J, Rantanen T, Nordström P, Savolainen H, Ohtonen P, Hurme S, Salminen P (2019) Risk of appendiceal neoplasm in periappendicular abscess in patients treated with interval appendectomy vs follow-up with magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA Surg 154:200. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4373
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4373 pubmed: 30484824
Furman MJ, Cahan M, Cohen P, Lambert LA (2013) Increased risk of mucinous neoplasm of the appendix in adults undergoing interval appendectomy. JAMA Surg 148:703. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.1212
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.1212 pubmed: 23740174
Lee W-S, Choi ST, Lee JN, Kim KK, Park YH, Baek JH (2011) A retrospective clinicopathological analysis of appendiceal tumors from 3,744 appendectomies: a single-institution study. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:617–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-1124-1
doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-1124-1 pubmed: 21234578
Deelder JD, Richir MC, Schoorl T, Schreurs WH (2014) How to treat an appendiceal inflammatory mass: operatively or nonoperatively? J Gastrointest Surg 18:641–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2460-1
doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2460-1 pubmed: 24493295
Kim JY, Kim JW, Park JH, Kim BC, Yoon SN (2019) Early versus late surgical management for complicated appendicitis in adults: a multicenter propensity score matching study. Ann Surg Treat Res 97(2):103–111. https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2019.97.2.103
doi: 10.4174/astr.2019.97.2.103 pubmed: 31388511 pmcid: 6669132
Smink, D, Soybel, DI (2020) Management of acute appendicitis in adults. In: Weiser M, Chen W (ed) UpToDate. Waltham, Mass.: UpToDate, 2020. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/management-of-acute-appendicitis-in-adults . Accessed April 2, 2020.

Auteurs

Danielle Hayes (D)

Department of Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

Shelby Reiter (S)

Department of Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA. Shelby.Reiter@swedish.org.
General Surgery Residency, Swedish Medical Center, 747 Broadway, Heath 10, Seattle, WA, 98122, USA. Shelby.Reiter@swedish.org.

Edard Hagen (E)

Department of Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

Gary Lucas (G)

Department of Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

Isabelle Chu (I)

Department of Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

Tobias Muñiz (T)

Department of Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

Ryan Martinez (R)

Department of Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH