What influences practitioners' readiness to deliver psychological interventions by telephone? A qualitative study of behaviour change using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Guided self-help Improving access to psychological services Mental health Psychological treatment Psychological wellbeing practitioners Telephone treatment Theoretical domains framework

Journal

BMC psychiatry
ISSN: 1471-244X
Titre abrégé: BMC Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968559

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 07 2020
Historique:
received: 31 03 2020
accepted: 23 06 2020
entrez: 18 7 2020
pubmed: 18 7 2020
medline: 30 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Contemporary health policy is shifting towards remotely delivered care. A growing need to provide effective and accessible services, with maximal population reach has stimulated demand for flexible and efficient service models. The implementation of evidence-based practice has been slow, leaving many services ill equipped to respond to requests for non-face-to-face delivery. To address this translation gap, and provide empirically derived evidence to support large-scale practice change, our study aimed to explore practitioners' perspectives of the factors that enhance the delivery of a NICE-recommended psychological intervention, i.e. guided self-help by telephone (GSH-T), in routine care. We used the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to analyse our data, identify essential behaviour change processes and encourage the successful implementation of remote working in clinical practice. Thirty-four psychological wellbeing practitioners (PWPs) from the UK NHS Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services were interviewed. Data were first analysed inductively, with codes cross-matched deductively to the TDF. Analysis identified barriers to the delivery, engagement and implementation of GSH-T, within eight domains from the TDF: (i) Deficits in practitioner knowledge, (ii) Sub-optimal practitioner telephone skills, (iii) Practitioners' lack of beliefs in telephone capabilities and self-confidence, (iv) Practitioners' negative beliefs about consequences, (v) Negative emotions, (vi) Professional role expectations (vii) Negative social influences, and (viii) Challenges in the environmental context and resources. A degree of interdependence was observed between the TDF domains, such that improvements in one domain were often reported to confer secondary advantages in another. Multiple TDF domains emerge as relevant to improve delivery of GSH-T; and these domains are theoretically and practically interlinked. A multicomponent approach is recommended to facilitate the shift from in-person to telephone-based service delivery models, and prompt behaviour change at practitioner, patient and service levels. At a minimum, the development of practitioners' telephone skills, an increase in clients' awareness of telephone-based treatment, dilution of negative preconceptions about telephone treatment, and robust service level guidance and standards for implementation are required. This is the first study that provides clear direction on how to improve telephone delivery and optimise implementation, aligning with current mental health policy and service improvement.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Contemporary health policy is shifting towards remotely delivered care. A growing need to provide effective and accessible services, with maximal population reach has stimulated demand for flexible and efficient service models. The implementation of evidence-based practice has been slow, leaving many services ill equipped to respond to requests for non-face-to-face delivery. To address this translation gap, and provide empirically derived evidence to support large-scale practice change, our study aimed to explore practitioners' perspectives of the factors that enhance the delivery of a NICE-recommended psychological intervention, i.e. guided self-help by telephone (GSH-T), in routine care. We used the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to analyse our data, identify essential behaviour change processes and encourage the successful implementation of remote working in clinical practice.
METHOD
Thirty-four psychological wellbeing practitioners (PWPs) from the UK NHS Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services were interviewed. Data were first analysed inductively, with codes cross-matched deductively to the TDF.
RESULTS
Analysis identified barriers to the delivery, engagement and implementation of GSH-T, within eight domains from the TDF: (i) Deficits in practitioner knowledge, (ii) Sub-optimal practitioner telephone skills, (iii) Practitioners' lack of beliefs in telephone capabilities and self-confidence, (iv) Practitioners' negative beliefs about consequences, (v) Negative emotions, (vi) Professional role expectations (vii) Negative social influences, and (viii) Challenges in the environmental context and resources. A degree of interdependence was observed between the TDF domains, such that improvements in one domain were often reported to confer secondary advantages in another.
CONCLUSIONS
Multiple TDF domains emerge as relevant to improve delivery of GSH-T; and these domains are theoretically and practically interlinked. A multicomponent approach is recommended to facilitate the shift from in-person to telephone-based service delivery models, and prompt behaviour change at practitioner, patient and service levels. At a minimum, the development of practitioners' telephone skills, an increase in clients' awareness of telephone-based treatment, dilution of negative preconceptions about telephone treatment, and robust service level guidance and standards for implementation are required. This is the first study that provides clear direction on how to improve telephone delivery and optimise implementation, aligning with current mental health policy and service improvement.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32677917
doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02761-3
pii: 10.1186/s12888-020-02761-3
pmc: PMC7364130
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

371

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : RP-PG-1016-20010
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Programme Grants for Applied Research
ID : RP-PG-1016-20010
Pays : International

Références

Nurse Res. 2006 Jul 1;13(4):84
pubmed: 27702218
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Jan;24(1):4-12
pubmed: 29320966
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Sep;62(9):1007-14
pubmed: 16143732
Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2011 Dec;42(6):543-549
pubmed: 22247588
J R Soc Med. 2005 May;98(5):232-4
pubmed: 15863775
Telemed J E Health. 2006 Oct;12(5):546-51
pubmed: 17042708
Clin Interv Aging. 2008;3(2):391-6
pubmed: 18686761
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Feb;14(1):26-33
pubmed: 15692000
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 14;14(6):e0217948
pubmed: 31199827
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37
pubmed: 22530986
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e42916
pubmed: 23028436
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Apr;82(2):349-54
pubmed: 24447003
J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6 Suppl 1:S20-2
pubmed: 10793961
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 30;5(9):e008592
pubmed: 26423853
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Oct;71(7):1308-1315
pubmed: 20675026
Telemed J E Health. 2013 Jun;19(6):444-54
pubmed: 23697504
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019 May;28(5):655-666
pubmed: 30229306
J Affect Disord. 2020 Mar 15;265:120-131
pubmed: 32090733
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Feb;24(2):65-74
pubmed: 28038505
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Jun;25(5-6):285-296
pubmed: 29117458
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Mar 1;8(2):212-224
pubmed: 29381786
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Jun;52(12):1889-901
pubmed: 11352414
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2014 Nov 21;8(1):46
pubmed: 25473416
J Affect Disord. 2020 Jan 1;260:514-526
pubmed: 31539688
Implement Sci. 2017 Jun 21;12(1):77
pubmed: 28637486
Implement Sci. 2013 Mar 23;8:35
pubmed: 23522377
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Health Policy. 2003 Apr;64(1):39-54
pubmed: 12644327
Br J Clin Psychol. 1999 Sep;38(3):215-29
pubmed: 10532145
Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Aug;32(6):454-66
pubmed: 22705583
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 14;20(1):36
pubmed: 31931786
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Mar 01;16:56
pubmed: 26932326
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 7;20(1):156
pubmed: 32264865

Auteurs

Cintia L Faija (CL)

School of Health Sciences, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Cintia.faija@manchester.ac.uk.

Janice Connell (J)

Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Charlotte Welsh (C)

School of Health Sciences, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Kerry Ardern (K)

Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Elinor Hopkin (E)

School of Health Sciences, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Judith Gellatly (J)

School of Health Sciences, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Kelly Rushton (K)

School of Health Sciences, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Claire Fraser (C)

School of Health Sciences, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Annie Irvine (A)

Department of Language and Linguistic Science, University of York, York, Heslington, UK.

Christopher J Armitage (CJ)

Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Paul Wilson (P)

Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Peter Bower (P)

NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Karina Lovell (K)

School of Health Sciences, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Penny Bee (P)

School of Health Sciences, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH