Practical approaches for diagnosis and management of prurigo nodularis: United States expert panel consensus.


Journal

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
ISSN: 1097-6787
Titre abrégé: J Am Acad Dermatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7907132

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Historique:
received: 01 05 2020
revised: 03 07 2020
accepted: 05 07 2020
pubmed: 19 7 2020
medline: 29 7 2021
entrez: 19 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a chronic disease characterized by intensely pruritic, raised, nodular lesions. Because there are currently no United States Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies specifically for PN, management is highly variable, and no consensus exists on treatment regimens. To provide practical guidance to help United States dermatologists diagnose and effectively treat patients with PN. We participated in a roundtable discussion to develop consensus recommendations on diagnosis and treatment of PN from a United States perspective. The core findings in PN are the presence of firm, nodular lesions; pruritus lasting at least 6 weeks; and a history or signs, or both, of repeated scratching, picking, or rubbing. The diagnostic workup involves a complete review of systems, considering potential systemic diseases, and assessment of disease severity, including disease burden and pruritus intensity. Treatment should be selected based on a patient's clinical presentation, comorbidities, and response to prior treatments and should address both neural and immunologic components of pruritus. Data on PN are from anecdotal or small clinical trials, and all treatments are currently used off-label. An effective treatment approach for patients with PN should be based on clinical judgment and tailored to the individual needs of the patient.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a chronic disease characterized by intensely pruritic, raised, nodular lesions. Because there are currently no United States Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies specifically for PN, management is highly variable, and no consensus exists on treatment regimens.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To provide practical guidance to help United States dermatologists diagnose and effectively treat patients with PN.
METHODS METHODS
We participated in a roundtable discussion to develop consensus recommendations on diagnosis and treatment of PN from a United States perspective.
RESULTS RESULTS
The core findings in PN are the presence of firm, nodular lesions; pruritus lasting at least 6 weeks; and a history or signs, or both, of repeated scratching, picking, or rubbing. The diagnostic workup involves a complete review of systems, considering potential systemic diseases, and assessment of disease severity, including disease burden and pruritus intensity. Treatment should be selected based on a patient's clinical presentation, comorbidities, and response to prior treatments and should address both neural and immunologic components of pruritus.
LIMITATIONS CONCLUSIONS
Data on PN are from anecdotal or small clinical trials, and all treatments are currently used off-label.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
An effective treatment approach for patients with PN should be based on clinical judgment and tailored to the individual needs of the patient.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32682025
pii: S0190-9622(20)32189-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.07.025
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Dermatologic Agents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

747-760

Subventions

Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : K08 AR069753
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Sarina Elmariah (S)

Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Brian Kim (B)

Center for the Study of Itch and Sensory Disorders, the Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, the Department of Anesthesiology, and the Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri.

Timothy Berger (T)

Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, California.

Sarah Chisolm (S)

Department of Dermatology, Emory University, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia; Regional Telehealth Service, Veterans Affairs Veterans Integrated Service Network 7 Southeast Network, Duluth, Georgia.

Shawn G Kwatra (SG)

Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

Nicholas Mollanazar (N)

Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Gil Yosipovitch (G)

Miami Itch Center, Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida. Electronic address: yosipovitch@med.miami.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH