Multi-institutional Experience Comparing Outcomes of Adult Patients Undergoing Secondary Versus Primary Robotic Pyeloplasty.


Journal

Urology
ISSN: 1527-9995
Titre abrégé: Urology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0366151

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2020
Historique:
received: 19 05 2020
revised: 02 07 2020
accepted: 06 07 2020
pubmed: 21 7 2020
medline: 5 3 2022
entrez: 21 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To describe surgical techniques and peri-operative outcomes with secondary robotic pyeloplasty (RP), and compare them to those of primary RP. We retrospectively reviewed our multi-institutional, collaborative of reconstructive robotic ureteral surgery (CORRUS) database for all consecutive patients who underwent RP between April 2012 and September 2019. Patients were grouped according to whether they underwent a primary or secondary pyeloplasty (performed for a recurrent stricture after previously failed pyeloplasty). Perioperative outcomes and surgical techniques were compared using nonparametric independent sample median tests and chi-square tests; P < .05 was considered significant. Of 158 patients, 28 (17.7%) and 130 (82.3%) underwent secondary and primary RP, respectively. Secondary RP, compared to primary RP, was associated with a higher median estimated blood loss (100.0 vs 50.0 milliliters, respectively; P < .01) and longer operative time (188.0 vs 136.0 minutes, respectively; P = .02). There was no difference in major (Clavien >2) complications (P = .29). At a median follow-up of 21.1 (IQR: 11.8-34.7) months, there was no difference in success between secondary and primary RP groups (85.7% vs 92.3%, respectively; P = .44). Buccal mucosa graft onlay ureteroplasty was performed more commonly (35.7% vs 0.0%, respectively, P < .01) and near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green was utilized more frequently (67.9% vs 40.8%, respectively; P < .01) for secondary vs primary repair. Although performing secondary RP is technically challenging, it is a safe and effective method for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after a previously failed pyeloplasty. Buccal mucosa graft onlay ureteroplasty and utilization of near-infrared fluorescence with indocyanine green may be particularly useful in the re-operative setting.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32687842
pii: S0090-4295(20)30850-5
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.07.008
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

275-280

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Matthew Lee (M)

Department of Urology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: matthewlee019@gmail.com.

Ziho Lee (Z)

Department of Urology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

David Strauss (D)

Department of Urology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

Min Suk Jun (MS)

Department of Urology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine at New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY.

Helaine Koster (H)

Department of Urology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University, Hackensack, NJ.

Aeen M Asghar (AM)

Department of Urology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

Randall Lee (R)

Department of Urology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

Brian Chao (B)

Department of Urology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine at New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY.

Nathan Cheng (N)

Department of Urology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University, Hackensack, NJ.

Mutahar Ahmed (M)

Department of Urology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University, Hackensack, NJ.

Gregory Lovallo (G)

Department of Urology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University, Hackensack, NJ.

Ravi Munver (R)

Department of Urology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University, Hackensack, NJ.

Lee C Zhao (LC)

Department of Urology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine at New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY.

Michael D Stifelman (MD)

Department of Urology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University, Hackensack, NJ.

Daniel D Eun (DD)

Department of Urology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH