Multistate Models for Examining the Progression of Intermittently Measured Patient-Reported Symptoms Among Patients With Cancer: The Importance of Accounting for Interval Censoring.

ESAS Symptom progression intermittent observation interval censoring multistate models panel data sojourn time transition probability

Journal

Journal of pain and symptom management
ISSN: 1873-6513
Titre abrégé: J Pain Symptom Manage
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8605836

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2021
Historique:
received: 17 03 2020
revised: 07 07 2020
accepted: 11 07 2020
pubmed: 21 7 2020
medline: 24 6 2021
entrez: 21 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Patients with cancer in Ontario, Canada, receive symptom monitoring in a standardized fashion using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). These measurements can be used to understand symptom progression during the cancer trajectory. This study demonstrates the implementation of multistate models for examining symptom progression, while appropriately accounting for intermittent observation. We also compare the estimates when the panel nature of the data is ignored. This was a population-based retrospective cohort study using linked administrative health-care databases. The cohort consisted of patients who were newly diagnosed with a primary cancer and had at least one ESAS assessment completed between 2007 and 2015 in Ontario, Canada. A 5-state model was developed to examine the progression of symptom severity, where estimation was conducted with and without accommodating for the panel nature of the symptom data. The study cohort consisted of 212,615 patients diagnosed with cancer, collectively having 1,006,360 ESAS assessments within the first year after diagnosis. The median (interquartile range) of the number of ESAS assessments per patient was 3 (1-6), and the average gap time between consecutive assessments was approximately three months. The estimated mean sojourn time in each state was consistently and significantly greater when ignoring interval censoring than when accounting for it. This held true for all states and symptoms. Our work demonstrates the use of multistate models and the importance of accommodating for intermittent observation when examining symptom progression using ESAS among patients with cancer. This work serves as a methodological guide for applied researchers interested in modeling disease progression under the presence of intermittent observation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32688014
pii: S0885-3924(20)30605-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.07.012
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

54-62

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Rinku Sutradhar (R)

ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: rinku.sutradhar@ices.on.ca.

Lisa Barbera (L)

ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH