Multicenter, retrospective analysis of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke in nonagenarians.


Journal

Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association
ISSN: 1532-8511
Titre abrégé: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9111633

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Historique:
received: 22 10 2019
revised: 04 03 2020
accepted: 14 03 2020
entrez: 22 7 2020
pubmed: 22 7 2020
medline: 28 10 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

With the increasing age of acute stroke patients being admitted to hospitals, more data are needed on indications, complications and outcome of endovascular treatment (EVT) in the very elderly. Retrospective observational study with data collection from Belgian, Swiss, Canadian comprehensive stroke centers and Swedish EVT National database. All patients with acute ischemic stroke were eligible if aged older than or ≥90 years and treated with EVT ± pretreatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Safety assessment comprised presence of periprocedural complications, hemorrhagic transformation or other adverse events (<7days). Efficacy and outcome measures were successful recanalization (modified Treatment In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score ≥2b), favorable clinical outcome (modified Rankin Score (mRS) 0-2) and 3-months mortality. Inclusion of 112 nonagenarians (mean age 93.3 ± 2.5 years; 76.8% women; pre-mRS ≤2 in 69.4%). Pretreatment with IVT was performed in 54.7%. In 74.6% successful recanalization (mTICI ≥2b) was achieved. Favorable outcome (mRS ≤2) was seen in 16.4% and 3-months mortality was 62.3%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed younger age (odds ratio [OR] 2.99; 1.29-6.95; P = .011) and lower prestroke mRS (OR 13.46; 2.32-78.30; P = .004) as significant predictors for good clinical outcome at 90 days. Our observational study on EVT in nonagenarians demonstrates the need for careful patient selection. A substantial proportion of nonagenarians shows an unfavorable clinical outcome and high mortality, despite acceptable recanalization rates. A high prestroke disability (mRS) and advancing age predict an unfavorable outcome. Treatment decisions should be made on case-by-case evaluation, keeping in mind limited chances of favorable outcome and high risk of mortality.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
With the increasing age of acute stroke patients being admitted to hospitals, more data are needed on indications, complications and outcome of endovascular treatment (EVT) in the very elderly.
METHODS METHODS
Retrospective observational study with data collection from Belgian, Swiss, Canadian comprehensive stroke centers and Swedish EVT National database. All patients with acute ischemic stroke were eligible if aged older than or ≥90 years and treated with EVT ± pretreatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Safety assessment comprised presence of periprocedural complications, hemorrhagic transformation or other adverse events (<7days). Efficacy and outcome measures were successful recanalization (modified Treatment In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score ≥2b), favorable clinical outcome (modified Rankin Score (mRS) 0-2) and 3-months mortality.
RESULTS RESULTS
Inclusion of 112 nonagenarians (mean age 93.3 ± 2.5 years; 76.8% women; pre-mRS ≤2 in 69.4%). Pretreatment with IVT was performed in 54.7%. In 74.6% successful recanalization (mTICI ≥2b) was achieved. Favorable outcome (mRS ≤2) was seen in 16.4% and 3-months mortality was 62.3%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed younger age (odds ratio [OR] 2.99; 1.29-6.95; P = .011) and lower prestroke mRS (OR 13.46; 2.32-78.30; P = .004) as significant predictors for good clinical outcome at 90 days.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our observational study on EVT in nonagenarians demonstrates the need for careful patient selection. A substantial proportion of nonagenarians shows an unfavorable clinical outcome and high mortality, despite acceptable recanalization rates. A high prestroke disability (mRS) and advancing age predict an unfavorable outcome. Treatment decisions should be made on case-by-case evaluation, keeping in mind limited chances of favorable outcome and high risk of mortality.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32689620
pii: S1052-3057(20)30201-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104817
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104817

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosures No conflicts of interests to declare: HJ, NS, FO, DT, DBS, VG, GJ, KJ, PA, GP, HF, DT, DJ, LR, CSA, HS, YL, BI, VM, VDZT, MA, PH, OC, KF, VPA. VG is a consultant for Medtronic and Bayer and has received speaker fees from Bayer, Pfizer, AMGEN and travel fees from BI. AT is a consultant for Ablynx, Amnis Therapeutics, Anaconda, Cerenovus-Neuravi, Medtronic and Rapid Medical.MP has received within the last 2 years through his institution research grants from the Swiss Heart Foundation and BMS; speaker fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Medtronic, and Amgen; consulting fees from Medtronic and Amgen, and honoraria from scientific advisory boards from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Pfizer and BMS. All this support is used for stroke education and research.

Auteurs

Helena Janssen (H)

Ghent University, Department of neurology, Gent, Belgium. Electronic address: Helena.janssen@uzgent.be.

Stefania Nannoni (S)

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Olivier Francois (O)

AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium.

Tom Dewaele (T)

AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium.

Sofie De Blauwe (S)

AZ Sint-Jan, Brugge-Oostende, Belgium.

Geert Vanhooren (G)

AZ Sint-Jan, Brugge-Oostende, Belgium.

Johan Ghekiere (J)

AZ Sint-Jan, Brugge-Oostende, Belgium.

Joost Kager (J)

AZ Sint-Jan, Brugge-Oostende, Belgium.

André Peeters (A)

Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussel, Belgium.

Pierre Goffette (P)

Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussel, Belgium.

Frank Hammer (F)

Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussel, Belgium.

Thierry Duprez (T)

Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussel, Belgium.

Jelle Demeestere (J)

University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Robin Lemmens (R)

University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Sandra Cornelissen (S)

University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Sam Heye (S)

University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Laetitia Yperzeele (L)

Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.

Ingrid Baar (I)

Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.

Maurits Voormolen (M)

Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.

Thijs Van der Zijden (T)

Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.

Annelies Mondelaers (A)

Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.

Tommy Andersson (T)

Ghent University, Department of neurology, Gent, Belgium; AZ Groeninge Kortrijk and Karolinska Sweden.

Hans Pottel (H)

University of Leuven campus Kortrijk, Kortrijk, Belgium.

Céline Odier (C)

Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.

Fatine Karkri (F)

Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.

Patrik Michel (P)

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Peter Vanacker (P)

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland; Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium; AZ Groeninge Kortrijk, Antwerp University Hospital and University Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH