Blood transcriptomic discrimination of bacterial and viral infections in the emergency department: a multi-cohort observational validation study.
Bacterial infection, viral infection
Blood transcriptional profiling
Emergency department
Journal
BMC medicine
ISSN: 1741-7015
Titre abrégé: BMC Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101190723
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 07 2020
21 07 2020
Historique:
received:
24
11
2019
accepted:
26
05
2020
entrez:
22
7
2020
pubmed:
22
7
2020
medline:
22
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is an urgent need to develop biomarkers that stratify risk of bacterial infection in order to support antimicrobial stewardship in emergency hospital admissions. We used computational machine learning to derive a rule-out blood transcriptomic signature of bacterial infection (SeptiCyte™ TRIAGE) from eight published case-control studies. We then validated this signature by itself in independent case-control data from more than 1500 samples in total, and in combination with our previously published signature for viral infections (SeptiCyte™ VIRUS) using pooled data from a further 1088 samples. Finally, we tested the performance of these signatures in a prospective observational cohort of emergency department (ED) patients with fever, and we used the combined SeptiCyte™ signature in a mixture modelling approach to estimate the prevalence of bacterial and viral infections in febrile ED patients without microbiological diagnoses. The combination of SeptiCyte™ TRIAGE with our published signature for viral infections (SeptiCyte™ VIRUS) discriminated bacterial and viral infections in febrile ED patients, with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.90-1), compared to 0.79 (0.68-0.91) for WCC and 0.73 (0.61-0.86) for CRP. At pre-test probabilities 0.35 and 0.72, the combined SeptiCyte™ score achieved a negative predictive value for bacterial infection of 0.97 (0.90-0.99) and 0.86 (0.64-0.96), compared to 0.90 (0.80-0.94) and 0.66 (0.48-0.79) for WCC and 0.88 (0.69-0.95) and 0.60 (0.31-0.72) for CRP. In a mixture modelling approach, the combined SeptiCyte™ score estimated that 24% of febrile ED cases receiving antibacterials without a microbiological diagnosis were due to viral infections. Our analysis also suggested that a proportion of patients with bacterial infection recovered without antibacterials. Blood transcriptional biomarkers offer exciting opportunities to support precision antibacterial prescribing in ED and improve diagnostic classification of patients without microbiologically confirmed infections.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
There is an urgent need to develop biomarkers that stratify risk of bacterial infection in order to support antimicrobial stewardship in emergency hospital admissions.
METHODS
We used computational machine learning to derive a rule-out blood transcriptomic signature of bacterial infection (SeptiCyte™ TRIAGE) from eight published case-control studies. We then validated this signature by itself in independent case-control data from more than 1500 samples in total, and in combination with our previously published signature for viral infections (SeptiCyte™ VIRUS) using pooled data from a further 1088 samples. Finally, we tested the performance of these signatures in a prospective observational cohort of emergency department (ED) patients with fever, and we used the combined SeptiCyte™ signature in a mixture modelling approach to estimate the prevalence of bacterial and viral infections in febrile ED patients without microbiological diagnoses.
RESULTS
The combination of SeptiCyte™ TRIAGE with our published signature for viral infections (SeptiCyte™ VIRUS) discriminated bacterial and viral infections in febrile ED patients, with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.90-1), compared to 0.79 (0.68-0.91) for WCC and 0.73 (0.61-0.86) for CRP. At pre-test probabilities 0.35 and 0.72, the combined SeptiCyte™ score achieved a negative predictive value for bacterial infection of 0.97 (0.90-0.99) and 0.86 (0.64-0.96), compared to 0.90 (0.80-0.94) and 0.66 (0.48-0.79) for WCC and 0.88 (0.69-0.95) and 0.60 (0.31-0.72) for CRP. In a mixture modelling approach, the combined SeptiCyte™ score estimated that 24% of febrile ED cases receiving antibacterials without a microbiological diagnosis were due to viral infections. Our analysis also suggested that a proportion of patients with bacterial infection recovered without antibacterials.
CONCLUSIONS
Blood transcriptional biomarkers offer exciting opportunities to support precision antibacterial prescribing in ED and improve diagnostic classification of patients without microbiologically confirmed infections.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32690014
doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01653-3
pii: 10.1186/s12916-020-01653-3
pmc: PMC7372897
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
185Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 207511/Z/17/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 107311/Z/15/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/L001756/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : National Institute for Health Research
ID : CS_2016_16_007
Pays : International
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr;45(4):623-629
pubmed: 28169944
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 03;11(8):e0160278
pubmed: 27486746
JAMA. 2016 Aug 23-30;316(8):835-45
pubmed: 27552617
Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):457-63
pubmed: 20083920
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 19;66(7):1004-1012
pubmed: 29136126
Nature. 2011 Aug 24;476(7361):393-4
pubmed: 21866137
Emerg Med J. 2015 Jul;32(7):531-4
pubmed: 25183249
J Clin Pathol. 2004 Sep;57(9):950-5
pubmed: 15333656
Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun;34(6):1589-96
pubmed: 16625125
Lancet. 2016 Jan 9;387(10014):176-87
pubmed: 26603922
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 6;7(1):2914
pubmed: 28588308
Nat Methods. 2015 Apr;12(4):277-8
pubmed: 26005726
Sci Transl Med. 2016 Jul 6;8(346):346ra91
pubmed: 27384347
Sci Transl Med. 2015 May 13;7(287):287ra71
pubmed: 25972003
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Jul 1;174(1):84-93
pubmed: 16603606
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Dec;24(12):1282-1289
pubmed: 29870855
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Oct 1;198(7):903-913
pubmed: 29624409
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10
pubmed: 26903338
BMC Genomics. 2006 Jun 08;7:142
pubmed: 16762068
Am J Med. 1980 Mar;68(3):344-55
pubmed: 6987871
Neth J Med. 2011 Mar;69(3):124-8
pubmed: 21444937
PLoS Med. 2015 Dec 08;12(12):e1001916
pubmed: 26645559
Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Mar;26(3):317-25
pubmed: 18278033
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008 Apr;61(4):763-5
pubmed: 18276601