Quality of life in cancer patients treated with mistletoe: a systematic review and meta-analysis.


Journal

BMC complementary medicine and therapies
ISSN: 2662-7671
Titre abrégé: BMC Complement Med Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101761232

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Jul 2020
Historique:
received: 24 10 2019
accepted: 02 07 2020
entrez: 22 7 2020
pubmed: 22 7 2020
medline: 26 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Mistletoe extracts are used as an adjunct therapy for cancer patients, but there is dissent as to whether this therapy has a positive impact on quality of life (QoL). We conducted a systematic review searching in several databases (Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Science Citation Index, clinicaltrials.gov, opengrey.org ) by combining terms that cover the fields of "neoplasm", "quality of life" and "mistletoe". We included prospective controlled trials that compared mistletoe extracts with a control in cancer patients and reported QoL or related dimensions. The quality of the studies was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2. We conducted a quantitative meta-analysis. We included 26 publications with 30 data sets. The studies were heterogeneous. The pooled standardized mean difference (random effects model) for global QoL after treatment with mistletoe extracts vs. control was d = 0.61 (95% CI 0.41-0.81, p < 0,00001). The effect was stronger for younger patients, with longer treatment, in studies with lower risk of bias, in randomized and blinded studies. Sensitivity analyses support the validity of the finding. 50% of the QoL subdomains (e.g. pain, nausea) show a significant improvement after mistletoe treatment. Most studies have a high risk of bias or at least raise some concern. Mistletoe extracts produce a significant, medium-sized effect on QoL in cancer. Risk of bias in the analyzed studies is likely due to the specific type of treatment, which is difficult to blind; yet this risk is unlikely to affect the outcome. CRD42019137704 .

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Mistletoe extracts are used as an adjunct therapy for cancer patients, but there is dissent as to whether this therapy has a positive impact on quality of life (QoL).
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a systematic review searching in several databases (Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Science Citation Index, clinicaltrials.gov, opengrey.org ) by combining terms that cover the fields of "neoplasm", "quality of life" and "mistletoe". We included prospective controlled trials that compared mistletoe extracts with a control in cancer patients and reported QoL or related dimensions. The quality of the studies was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2. We conducted a quantitative meta-analysis.
RESULTS RESULTS
We included 26 publications with 30 data sets. The studies were heterogeneous. The pooled standardized mean difference (random effects model) for global QoL after treatment with mistletoe extracts vs. control was d = 0.61 (95% CI 0.41-0.81, p < 0,00001). The effect was stronger for younger patients, with longer treatment, in studies with lower risk of bias, in randomized and blinded studies. Sensitivity analyses support the validity of the finding. 50% of the QoL subdomains (e.g. pain, nausea) show a significant improvement after mistletoe treatment. Most studies have a high risk of bias or at least raise some concern.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Mistletoe extracts produce a significant, medium-sized effect on QoL in cancer. Risk of bias in the analyzed studies is likely due to the specific type of treatment, which is difficult to blind; yet this risk is unlikely to affect the outcome.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION UNASSIGNED
CRD42019137704 .

Identifiants

pubmed: 32690087
doi: 10.1186/s12906-020-03013-3
pii: 10.1186/s12906-020-03013-3
pmc: PMC7370416
doi:

Substances chimiques

Plant Extracts 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

227

Subventions

Organisme : Förderverein komplementärmedizinische Krebsforschung
ID : n.a.

Références

Psychooncology. 2004 Jan;13(1):26-36
pubmed: 14745743
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019 Apr;145(4):927-939
pubmed: 30673872
Anticancer Res. 2004 Jan-Feb;24(1):303-9
pubmed: 15015612
Anticancer Res. 2004 Mar-Apr;24(2C):1293-302
pubmed: 15154663
Recent Results Cancer Res. 2014;197:137-52
pubmed: 24305774
Forsch Komplementmed. 2009 Aug;16(4):217-26
pubmed: 19729932
J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Mar;55(3):285-95
pubmed: 11864800
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Mar;49(5):1058-64
pubmed: 23218588
Forsch Komplementmed. 2006 Oct;13(5):285-92
pubmed: 17057389
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:430518
pubmed: 24701238
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012 Oct 03;12:172
pubmed: 23033982
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019 Mar;145(3):695-707
pubmed: 30673873
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):139-44
pubmed: 9440735
Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58
pubmed: 12111919
Eur J Med Res. 2006 Nov 30;11(11):485-95
pubmed: 17182361
Cancer Lett. 1996 Jan 19;99(1):59-72
pubmed: 8564930
Cancer Res. 1989 Sep 1;49(17):4803-8
pubmed: 2758413
Anticancer Res. 2005 Nov-Dec;25(6C):4583-90
pubmed: 16334146
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014 Jul 21;111(29-30):493-502, 33 p following 502
pubmed: 25142075
Anticancer Res. 1996 Nov-Dec;16(6B):3799-802
pubmed: 9042260
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2019 Dec;9(4):217-222
pubmed: 31854162
J Exp Ther Oncol. 2018 May;12(3):217-221
pubmed: 29790313
Int J Cancer. 2003 Nov 1;107(2):262-7
pubmed: 12949804
Onkologie. 2000 Dec;23(6):558-563
pubmed: 11441261
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:210198
pubmed: 24803944
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;(2):CD003297
pubmed: 18425885
Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2009 Jul 06;3:35-45
pubmed: 21556248
Arzneimittelforschung. 2007;57(10):665-78
pubmed: 18074761
HNO. 2006 Apr;54(4):277-86
pubmed: 16132877
Eur J Med Res. 2005 Oct 18;10(10):411-8
pubmed: 16287602
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2019 Apr 17;2019:5893017
pubmed: 31118962
Anticancer Res. 2006 Mar-Apr;26(2B):1519-29
pubmed: 16619567
Eur J Med Res. 2008 Mar 31;13(3):107-20
pubmed: 18499556
Forsch Komplementmed. 2007 Jun;14(3):140-7
pubmed: 17596694
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:219402
pubmed: 21747894
Integr Cancer Ther. 2010 Jun;9(2):142-57
pubmed: 20483874
Forsch Komplementmed. 2008 Feb;15(1):22-30
pubmed: 18334811

Auteurs

Martin Loef (M)

CHS-Institut, Schönwalder Str. 17, D-13347, Berlin, Germany.

Harald Walach (H)

CHS-Institut, Schönwalder Str. 17, D-13347, Berlin, Germany. hwalac@gmail.com.
Department Pediatric Gastroenterology, Poznan Medical University, Poznan, Poland. hwalac@gmail.com.
Department Psychologie, Universität Witten-Herdecke, Witten, Germany. hwalac@gmail.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH