Effectiveness of hepatitis A vaccination among people living with HIV in Taiwan: Is one dose enough?


Journal

Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection = Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi
ISSN: 1995-9133
Titre abrégé: J Microbiol Immunol Infect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100956211

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Historique:
received: 29 04 2020
revised: 23 06 2020
accepted: 27 06 2020
pubmed: 22 7 2020
medline: 23 2 2022
entrez: 22 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Single dose hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccine had been proven its efficacy in immunocompetent but not immunocompromised hosts. We aim to investigate the effectiveness of one dose versus 2 doses HAV vaccine among people living with HIV (PLHIV). We conducted a 1:1 single center retrospective case-control study for PLHIV in Northern Taiwan. Case patients were those who received single dose HAV vaccine and controls were those who completed standard 2 doses HAV vaccine. Nationwide campaign of single dose HAV vaccine had been practiced for high risk population including PLHIV and those who had newly diagnosed sexually transmitted diseases. During February 2016 and December 2017, 90 cases received single dose HAV vaccine provided while the other 90 age-matched controls received 2 doses vaccine were enrolled. We found more injection drug users (22.22% vs. 1.11%, p < 0.0001), more co-infection with viral hepatitis C (28.89% vs. 5.56%, p < 0.0001), and history of syphilis infection (56.67% VS 30%, p = 0.0003) in single dose group than 2 doses group. Seroconversion rate at one year was significantly higher in 2 doses group (97.78% vs 56.67%, p < 0.0001). Among single dose group, people with hepatitis B or C virus co-infection (HBV: p = 0.02, aOR: 0.03, 95% CI: 0.002-0.55; HCV: p = 0.002, aOR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.08-0.58) were less likely to achieve seropositivity, while those who had higher CD4 count at baseline and one year, had better response to vaccine. Two doses HAV vaccine is necessary among PLHIV to achieve sustained seroresponse rather than single dose.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Single dose hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccine had been proven its efficacy in immunocompetent but not immunocompromised hosts. We aim to investigate the effectiveness of one dose versus 2 doses HAV vaccine among people living with HIV (PLHIV).
METHOD METHODS
We conducted a 1:1 single center retrospective case-control study for PLHIV in Northern Taiwan. Case patients were those who received single dose HAV vaccine and controls were those who completed standard 2 doses HAV vaccine. Nationwide campaign of single dose HAV vaccine had been practiced for high risk population including PLHIV and those who had newly diagnosed sexually transmitted diseases.
RESULTS RESULTS
During February 2016 and December 2017, 90 cases received single dose HAV vaccine provided while the other 90 age-matched controls received 2 doses vaccine were enrolled. We found more injection drug users (22.22% vs. 1.11%, p < 0.0001), more co-infection with viral hepatitis C (28.89% vs. 5.56%, p < 0.0001), and history of syphilis infection (56.67% VS 30%, p = 0.0003) in single dose group than 2 doses group. Seroconversion rate at one year was significantly higher in 2 doses group (97.78% vs 56.67%, p < 0.0001). Among single dose group, people with hepatitis B or C virus co-infection (HBV: p = 0.02, aOR: 0.03, 95% CI: 0.002-0.55; HCV: p = 0.002, aOR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.08-0.58) were less likely to achieve seropositivity, while those who had higher CD4 count at baseline and one year, had better response to vaccine.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Two doses HAV vaccine is necessary among PLHIV to achieve sustained seroresponse rather than single dose.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32690395
pii: S1684-1182(20)30155-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.06.014
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Hepatitis A Vaccines 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

18-25

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest None.

Auteurs

Pei-Hsuan Tsai (PH)

Department of Internal Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

Mao-Song Tsai (MS)

Department of Internal Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

Ying-Hsuan Chiang (YH)

Department of Internal Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

Chung-Yu Shih (CY)

Department of Internal Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

Chia-Ying Liu (CY)

Department of Internal Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

Yu-Chung Chuang (YC)

Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.

Chia-Jui Yang (CJ)

Department of Internal Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei City, Taiwan. Electronic address: yangcj1206@gmail.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH