Exploration of Reduced Doses and Short-Cycle Therapy for Darunavir/Cobicistat in Patients with HIV Using Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulations.


Journal

Clinical pharmacokinetics
ISSN: 1179-1926
Titre abrégé: Clin Pharmacokinet
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 7606849

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 23 7 2020
medline: 1 10 2021
entrez: 23 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Protease inhibitors such as darunavir are an important therapeutic option in the anti-human immunodeficiency virus arsenal. Current dosage guidelines recommend using cobicistat- or ritonavir-boosted darunavir 800 mg every 24 h (q24h) in protease inhibitor-naïve patients, or ritonavir-boosted darunavir 600 mg q12h in experienced patients. However, darunavir displays a large, poorly characterized, inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability. The objectives of this study were to investigate the pharmacokinetics of darunavir and to elucidate the sources of its inter-individual variability using population pharmacokinetic modeling. Then, to determine the appropriateness of current treatment guidelines and the feasibility of alternative dosing regimens in a representative cohort of adult patients using simulations. Sparse pharmacokinetic samples were collected in 127 patients with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection, then supplemented with rich sampling data from a subset of 12 individuals. Data were analyzed using the nonlinear mixed-effects modeling software NONMEM. The effect of reduced doses (600 mg q24h and 400 mg q24h) or reduced frequency of administration (800 mg q24h for 5 days followed by 2 days of treatment interruption) was simulated. Our model adequately described the pharmacokinetics of darunavir. Predictors of individual exposure were CYP3A5*3 and SLCO3A1 rs8027174 genotypes, sex, and alpha-1 acid glycoprotein level. No relationship was apparent between darunavir area under the curve and treatment efficacy or safety. For reduced dose regimens, darunavir concentrations remained above the protein binding-corrected EC These results add to the growing body of evidence that darunavir-based therapy could be simplified to reduce costs and toxicity, as well as to improve patient compliance. However, the heterogeneity in pharmacokinetic response should be considered when assessing whether individual patients could benefit from a particular regimen, for instance through the use of population pharmacokinetic models. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03101644, date of registration: 5 April, 2017.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Protease inhibitors such as darunavir are an important therapeutic option in the anti-human immunodeficiency virus arsenal. Current dosage guidelines recommend using cobicistat- or ritonavir-boosted darunavir 800 mg every 24 h (q24h) in protease inhibitor-naïve patients, or ritonavir-boosted darunavir 600 mg q12h in experienced patients. However, darunavir displays a large, poorly characterized, inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability. The objectives of this study were to investigate the pharmacokinetics of darunavir and to elucidate the sources of its inter-individual variability using population pharmacokinetic modeling. Then, to determine the appropriateness of current treatment guidelines and the feasibility of alternative dosing regimens in a representative cohort of adult patients using simulations.
METHODS
Sparse pharmacokinetic samples were collected in 127 patients with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection, then supplemented with rich sampling data from a subset of 12 individuals. Data were analyzed using the nonlinear mixed-effects modeling software NONMEM. The effect of reduced doses (600 mg q24h and 400 mg q24h) or reduced frequency of administration (800 mg q24h for 5 days followed by 2 days of treatment interruption) was simulated.
RESULTS
Our model adequately described the pharmacokinetics of darunavir. Predictors of individual exposure were CYP3A5*3 and SLCO3A1 rs8027174 genotypes, sex, and alpha-1 acid glycoprotein level. No relationship was apparent between darunavir area under the curve and treatment efficacy or safety. For reduced dose regimens, darunavir concentrations remained above the protein binding-corrected EC
CONCLUSIONS
These results add to the growing body of evidence that darunavir-based therapy could be simplified to reduce costs and toxicity, as well as to improve patient compliance. However, the heterogeneity in pharmacokinetic response should be considered when assessing whether individual patients could benefit from a particular regimen, for instance through the use of population pharmacokinetic models.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03101644, date of registration: 5 April, 2017.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32696441
doi: 10.1007/s40262-020-00920-z
pii: 10.1007/s40262-020-00920-z
pmc: PMC7862523
doi:

Substances chimiques

HIV Protease Inhibitors 0
Cobicistat LW2E03M5PG
Ritonavir O3J8G9O825
Darunavir YO603Y8113

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03101644']

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

177-189

Références

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Apr;70(4):1139-45
pubmed: 25525195
Lancet. 2007 Jul 7;370(9581):49-58
pubmed: 17617272
HIV Med. 2016 May;17(5):358-67
pubmed: 26709605
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 May;69(5):475-83
pubmed: 20573083
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Jun;49(6):2314-21
pubmed: 15917527
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Oct;56(10):5409-13
pubmed: 22850510
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Nov;65(11):2319-28
pubmed: 20817741
J Int AIDS Soc. 2018 Feb;21(2):
pubmed: 29430854
Clin Chem. 2009 Jan;55(1):170-4
pubmed: 19028822
Lancet HIV. 2019 Jul;6(7):e428-e437
pubmed: 31202690
JAMA. 2018 Jul 24;320(4):379-396
pubmed: 30043070
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 May;58(9):1297-307
pubmed: 24457345
Antivir Ther. 2009;14(6):859-64
pubmed: 19812449
J Virol. 2007 Dec;81(24):13845-51
pubmed: 17928344
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 May 1;74(5):1348-1356
pubmed: 30715324
HIV Clin Trials. 2018 Oct;19(5):197-201
pubmed: 30605006
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2002 Dec;29(5-6):473-505
pubmed: 12795242
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 21;11(7):e0159305
pubmed: 27442068
AIDS. 2008 Jul 31;22(12):1389-97
pubmed: 18614861
AIDS. 2011 Apr 24;25(7):929-39
pubmed: 21346512
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Feb;70(2):627-30
pubmed: 25298517
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Oct;47(10):3123-9
pubmed: 14506019
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Jul;71(7):1755-8
pubmed: 26945713
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2016 Aug 1;1027:174-80
pubmed: 27290668
J Pharm Anal. 2016 Dec;6(6):396-403
pubmed: 29404009
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Oct;80(4):307-18
pubmed: 17015049
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2015 Jul;4(7):406-14
pubmed: 26312164
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013 Jul;52(7):543-53
pubmed: 23494984
Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2010 Feb;20(2):112-20
pubmed: 20051929
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Apr;71(4):1041-5
pubmed: 26712906
AIDS Res Treat. 2012;2012:186987
pubmed: 22536495
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Aug 1;73(8):2129-2136
pubmed: 29860402
AIDS. 2007 Mar 30;21(6):F11-8
pubmed: 17413685
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Mar 1;75(3):628-639
pubmed: 31754703
Ther Drug Monit. 2019 Feb;41(1):59-65
pubmed: 30489547
Nature. 2015 Oct 1;526(7571):68-74
pubmed: 26432245
AIDS. 2016 Nov 13;30(17):2617-2624
pubmed: 27456983
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Aug 1;73(8):2120-2128
pubmed: 29905808
HIV Med. 2019 May;20(5):337-343
pubmed: 30873741
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Sep;69(9):2489-98
pubmed: 24821595
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Feb 1;73(2):490-493
pubmed: 29216346
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Sep 1;72(9):2407-2409
pubmed: 28595364
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 24;13(4):e0196257
pubmed: 29689065
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 27;11(10):e0165631
pubmed: 27788239
New Microbiol. 2016 Oct;39(4):290-294
pubmed: 27551725
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007 Sep 1;46(1):24-31
pubmed: 17621237
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2004 Aug;75(2):85-94
pubmed: 15212851
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2018 Jun;14(6):601-611
pubmed: 29775551
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Mar 1;73(3):738-747
pubmed: 29186458
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2008 May;90(2):154-66
pubmed: 18215437

Auteurs

Gabriel Stillemans (G)

Integrated PharmacoMetrics, PharmacoGenomics and PharmacoKinetics, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. gabriel.stillemans@uclouvain.be.
Louvain Centre for Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. gabriel.stillemans@uclouvain.be.
, Avenue E. Mounier 72, B01.72.02, Brussels, Belgium. gabriel.stillemans@uclouvain.be.

Leila Belkhir (L)

Louvain Centre for Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
AIDS Reference Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Bernard Vandercam (B)

AIDS Reference Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Anne Vincent (A)

AIDS Reference Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Vincent Haufroid (V)

Louvain Centre for Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.

Laure Elens (L)

Integrated PharmacoMetrics, PharmacoGenomics and PharmacoKinetics, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Louvain Centre for Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH