Avoidance of Overtreatment of Rectal Cancer by Selective Chemoradiotherapy: Results of the Optimized Surgery and MRI-Based Multimodal Therapy Trial.


Journal

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
ISSN: 1879-1190
Titre abrégé: J Am Coll Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9431305

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2020
Historique:
received: 29 05 2020
revised: 22 06 2020
accepted: 23 06 2020
pubmed: 23 7 2020
medline: 26 3 2021
entrez: 23 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with rectal cancer carries a high risk of adverse effects. The aim of this study was to examine the selective application of nCRT based on patient risk profile, as determined by MRI, to find the optimal range between undertreatment and overtreatment. In this prospective multicenter observational study, nCRT before total mesorectal excision (TME) was indicated in high-risk patients with involved or threatened mesorectal fascia (≤1 mm), or cT4 or cT3 carcinomas of the lower rectal third. All other patients received primary surgery. Of the 1,093 patients, 878 (80.3%) were treated according to the protocol, 526 patients (59.9%) underwent primary surgery, and 352 patients (40.1%) underwent nCRT followed by surgery. The 3-year locoregional recurrence (LR) rate was 3.1%. Of 604 patients with clinical stages II and III, 267 (44.2%) had primary surgery; 337 (55.8%) received nCRT followed by TME. The 3-year LR rate was 3.9%, without significant differences between groups. In patients with clinical stages II and III who underwent primary surgery, 27.3% were diagnosed with pathological stage I. The results justify the restriction of nCRT to high-risk patients with rectal cancer classified by pretreatment MRI. Provided that a high-quality MRI diagnosis, TME surgery, and standardized examination of the resected specimen are performed, nCRT, with its adverse effects, costs, and treatment time can be avoided in more than 40% of patients with stage II or III rectal cancer with minimal risk of undertreatment. (clinicaltrials.gov NCT325649).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with rectal cancer carries a high risk of adverse effects. The aim of this study was to examine the selective application of nCRT based on patient risk profile, as determined by MRI, to find the optimal range between undertreatment and overtreatment.
STUDY DESIGN
In this prospective multicenter observational study, nCRT before total mesorectal excision (TME) was indicated in high-risk patients with involved or threatened mesorectal fascia (≤1 mm), or cT4 or cT3 carcinomas of the lower rectal third. All other patients received primary surgery.
RESULTS
Of the 1,093 patients, 878 (80.3%) were treated according to the protocol, 526 patients (59.9%) underwent primary surgery, and 352 patients (40.1%) underwent nCRT followed by surgery. The 3-year locoregional recurrence (LR) rate was 3.1%. Of 604 patients with clinical stages II and III, 267 (44.2%) had primary surgery; 337 (55.8%) received nCRT followed by TME. The 3-year LR rate was 3.9%, without significant differences between groups. In patients with clinical stages II and III who underwent primary surgery, 27.3% were diagnosed with pathological stage I.
CONCLUSIONS
The results justify the restriction of nCRT to high-risk patients with rectal cancer classified by pretreatment MRI. Provided that a high-quality MRI diagnosis, TME surgery, and standardized examination of the resected specimen are performed, nCRT, with its adverse effects, costs, and treatment time can be avoided in more than 40% of patients with stage II or III rectal cancer with minimal risk of undertreatment. (clinicaltrials.gov NCT325649).

Identifiants

pubmed: 32697965
pii: S1072-7515(20)30551-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.06.023
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01325649']

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

413-425.e2

Investigateurs

Martin E Kreis (ME)
Guenther Winde (G)
Rena Thomasmeyer (R)
Sigmar Stelzner (S)
Cornelius Bambauer (C)
Soenke Scheunemann (S)
Axel Faedrich (A)

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Reinhard Ruppert (R)

Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Endocrine Surgery, and Coloproctology, Municipal Hospital of Munich-Neuperlach, Germany.

Rainer Kube (R)

Department of Surgery, Carl-Thiem-Klinikum, Cottbus, Germany.

Joachim Strassburg (J)

Departments of General and Visceral Surgery, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany.

Andreas Lewin (A)

Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg, Germany.

Joerg Baral (J)

Municipal Hospital, Karlsruhe, Germany.

Christoph A Maurer (CA)

Departments of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland; Hirslanden Private Hospital Group, Clinic Beau-Site, Bern, Switzerland.

Joerg Sauer (J)

Department for General-Visceral and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Arnsberg, Germany.

Theodor Junginger (T)

Department of General and Abdominal Surgery at the University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenber-University, Mainz, Germany. Electronic address: Junginger@uni-mainz.de.

Paul Hermanek (P)

Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.

Susanne Merkel (S)

Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH