The Prognostic Impact of Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.


Journal

The Journal of urology
ISSN: 1527-3792
Titre abrégé: J Urol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376374

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 24 7 2020
medline: 6 11 2020
entrez: 24 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the prognostic impact of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate in patients with prostate cancer. A systematic search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement. We searched PubMed®, Web of Science™, the Cochrane Library and Scopus® up to October 2019. The end points were biochemical recurrence-free, cancer specific and overall survival. We identified 32 studies with 179,766 patients. A total of 31 studies containing 179,721 patients with localized and advanced prostate cancer were eligible for meta-analysis. In localized prostate cancer intraductal disease was associated with adverse outcomes including lower biochemical recurrence-free survival (pooled HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.75-2.50) and cancer specific survival (pooled HR 2.93, 95% CI 2.25-3.81). In advanced prostate cancer overall survival was lower in patients with vs without intraductal disease (pooled HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.43-2.14). Subgroup analysis by specimen type revealed that intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is a significant negative prognostic factor in both biopsies and prostatectomy specimens. Moreover, subgroup analyses based on the histopathological definitions of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate indicated that intraductal disease was significantly associated with lower biochemical recurrence-free, cancer specific and overall survival for almost all definitions. Intraductal disease is a histopathological feature of biologically and clinically aggressive prostate cancer. It confers worse oncologic outcomes in both localized and advanced prostate cancer, whether assessed in biopsy or prostatectomy specimen. The pathologist should assess for and report on the presence of intraductal disease in all prostate specimens. The urologist and radiation oncologist should consider this adverse feature in their clinical decision making.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32698712
doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001290
doi:

Substances chimiques

KLK3 protein, human EC 3.4.21.-
Kallikreins EC 3.4.21.-
Prostate-Specific Antigen EC 3.4.21.77

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

909-917

Auteurs

Noriyoshi Miura (N)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan.

Keiichiro Mori (K)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Hadi Mostafaei (H)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Research Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Fahad Quhal (F)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Reza Sari Motlagh (RS)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Benjamin Pradere (B)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France.

Ekaterina Laukhtina (E)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.

David D'Andrea (D)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Takashi Saika (T)

Department of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan.

Shahrokh F Shariat (SF)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas.
Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Department of Urology, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH