Quantifying flight aptitude variation in wild Anopheles gambiae in order to identify long-distance migrants.
Anopheles gambiae
Flight-aptitude
Migration
Sahel
Seasonality
Journal
Malaria journal
ISSN: 1475-2875
Titre abrégé: Malar J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101139802
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Jul 2020
22 Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
02
03
2020
accepted:
10
07
2020
entrez:
24
7
2020
pubmed:
24
7
2020
medline:
6
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In the West African Sahel, mosquito reproduction is halted during the 5-7 month-long dry season, due to the absence of surface waters required for larval development. However, recent studies have suggested that both Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.) and Anopheles arabiensis repopulate this region via migration from distant locations where larval sites are perennial. Anopheles coluzzii engages in more regional migration, presumably within the Sahel, following shifting resources correlating with the ever-changing patterns of Sahelian rainfall. Understanding mosquito migration is key to controlling malaria-a disease that continues to claim more than 400,000 lives annually, especially those of African children. Using tethered flight data of wild mosquitoes, the distribution of flight parameters were evaluated as indicators of long-range migrants versus appetitive flyers, and the species specific seasonal differences and gonotrophic states compared between two flight activity modalities. Morphometrical differences were evaluated in the wings of mosquitoes exhibiting high flight activity (HFA) vs. low flight activity (LFA). A novel tethered-flight assay was used to characterize flight in the three primary malaria vectors- An. arabiensis, An. coluzzii and An. gambiae s.s. The flights of tethered wild mosquitoes were audio-recorded from 21:00 h to 05:00 h in the following morning and three flight aptitude indices were examined: total flight duration, longest flight bout, and the number of flight bouts during the assay. The distributions of all flight indices were strongly skewed to the right, indicating that the population consisted of a majority of low-flight activity (LFA) mosquitoes and a minority of high-flight activity (HFA) mosquitoes. The median total flight was 586 s and the maximum value was 16,110 s (~ 4.5 h). In accordance with recent results, flight aptitude peaked in the wet season, and was higher in gravid females than in non-blood-fed females. Flight aptitude was also found to be higher in An. coluzzii compared to An. arabiensis, with intermediate values in An. gambiae s.s., but displaying no statistical difference. Evaluating differences in wing size and shape between LFA individuals and HFA ones, the wing size of HFA An. coluzzii was larger than that of LFAs during the wet season-its length was wider than predicted by allometry alone, indicating a change in wing shape. No statistically significant differences were found in the wing size/shape of An. gambiae s.s. or An. arabiensis. The partial agreement between the tethered flight results and recent results based on aerial sampling of these species suggest a degree of discrimination between appetitive flyers and long-distance migrants although identifying HFAs as long-distance migrants is not recommended without further investigation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In the West African Sahel, mosquito reproduction is halted during the 5-7 month-long dry season, due to the absence of surface waters required for larval development. However, recent studies have suggested that both Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.) and Anopheles arabiensis repopulate this region via migration from distant locations where larval sites are perennial. Anopheles coluzzii engages in more regional migration, presumably within the Sahel, following shifting resources correlating with the ever-changing patterns of Sahelian rainfall. Understanding mosquito migration is key to controlling malaria-a disease that continues to claim more than 400,000 lives annually, especially those of African children. Using tethered flight data of wild mosquitoes, the distribution of flight parameters were evaluated as indicators of long-range migrants versus appetitive flyers, and the species specific seasonal differences and gonotrophic states compared between two flight activity modalities. Morphometrical differences were evaluated in the wings of mosquitoes exhibiting high flight activity (HFA) vs. low flight activity (LFA).
METHODS
METHODS
A novel tethered-flight assay was used to characterize flight in the three primary malaria vectors- An. arabiensis, An. coluzzii and An. gambiae s.s. The flights of tethered wild mosquitoes were audio-recorded from 21:00 h to 05:00 h in the following morning and three flight aptitude indices were examined: total flight duration, longest flight bout, and the number of flight bouts during the assay.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The distributions of all flight indices were strongly skewed to the right, indicating that the population consisted of a majority of low-flight activity (LFA) mosquitoes and a minority of high-flight activity (HFA) mosquitoes. The median total flight was 586 s and the maximum value was 16,110 s (~ 4.5 h). In accordance with recent results, flight aptitude peaked in the wet season, and was higher in gravid females than in non-blood-fed females. Flight aptitude was also found to be higher in An. coluzzii compared to An. arabiensis, with intermediate values in An. gambiae s.s., but displaying no statistical difference. Evaluating differences in wing size and shape between LFA individuals and HFA ones, the wing size of HFA An. coluzzii was larger than that of LFAs during the wet season-its length was wider than predicted by allometry alone, indicating a change in wing shape. No statistically significant differences were found in the wing size/shape of An. gambiae s.s. or An. arabiensis.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The partial agreement between the tethered flight results and recent results based on aerial sampling of these species suggest a degree of discrimination between appetitive flyers and long-distance migrants although identifying HFAs as long-distance migrants is not recommended without further investigation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32698842
doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03333-2
pii: 10.1186/s12936-020-03333-2
pmc: PMC7374819
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
263Références
Adv Virus Res. 2006;67:453-517
pubmed: 17027687
Med Vet Entomol. 2003 Mar;17(1):102-9
pubmed: 12680932
J Pest Sci (2004). 2019;92(2):417-428
pubmed: 30956648
Int J Biol Sci. 2016 Mar 30;12(5):607-16
pubmed: 27143957
Bioscience. 2017 Oct 1;67(10):912-918
pubmed: 29599538
Science. 2016 Dec 23;354(6319):1584-1587
pubmed: 28008067
R Soc Open Sci. 2015 May 20;2(5):150085
pubmed: 26064664
Emerg Infect Dis. 2001 Sep-Oct;7(5):900-3
pubmed: 11747709
Oecologia. 1973 Jun;12(2):119-140
pubmed: 28308142
PLoS One. 2007 Apr 04;2(4):e354
pubmed: 17406678
Mol Ecol. 2015 Oct;24(19):4901-11
pubmed: 26331997
PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(5):e1002498
pubmed: 22589707
Med Vet Entomol. 2002 Dec;16(4):461-4
pubmed: 12510902
Nature. 2014 Dec 18;516(7531):387-90
pubmed: 25470038
J Exp Biol. 2016 Jun 1;219(Pt 11):1675-88
pubmed: 27207644
J Hyg (Lond). 1980 Aug;85(1):65-102
pubmed: 6131919
Tropenmed Parasitol. 1979 Sep;30(3):345-62
pubmed: 575581
J Exp Biol. 2011 Jul 15;214(Pt 14):2345-53
pubmed: 21697426
Annu Rev Entomol. 1997;42:475-502
pubmed: 15012321
Ecol Entomol. 2018 Aug;43(4):397-411
pubmed: 30046219
J Exp Biol. 2012 Jun 15;215(Pt 12):2013-21
pubmed: 22623189
Malar J. 2011 Jun 06;10:151
pubmed: 21645385
Ecol Evol. 2015 Dec 15;6(1):181-90
pubmed: 26811783
Ecol Lett. 2015 Mar;18(3):287-302
pubmed: 25611117
Bull Entomol Res. 2015 Oct;105(5):566-73
pubmed: 26074338
J Med Entomol. 1997 Nov;34(6):579-88
pubmed: 9439109
Curr Biol. 2019 Jul 8;29(13):2167-2173.e5
pubmed: 31204159
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Jun 27;285(1881):
pubmed: 29925611
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1951 May;235(625):163-290
pubmed: 24541037
Med Vet Entomol. 1993 Oct;7(4):323-7
pubmed: 8268485
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1979 Mar 26;204(1154):67-82
pubmed: 37514
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1996 Dec;27(4):810-7
pubmed: 9253890
Nature. 2019 Oct;574(7778):404-408
pubmed: 31578527
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Sep;83(3):601-6
pubmed: 20810827