Preliminary survey of the attitudes of Brazilian scientists towards pain management and assessment in animals used in science.


Journal

Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia
ISSN: 1467-2995
Titre abrégé: Vet Anaesth Analg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100956422

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 14 12 2019
revised: 07 05 2020
accepted: 12 05 2020
pubmed: 24 7 2020
medline: 22 6 2021
entrez: 24 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To investigate the current scenario in Brazil regarding pain assessment and control in experimental animals. Prospective survey. A confidential questionnaire was available online and sent by e-mail to Brazilian scientists working with animal experimentation in Brazil. Data collection was conducted from October 2016 to October 2017. The exclusion criteria included blank questionnaires or with <80% completed responses, researchers not performing experiments involving animals and foreign scientists. A total of 96 questionnaires from 104 respondents were analyzed. The Fisher's exact test showed a disparity between the proportions of scientists who recognized the importance of analgesia and their application of analgesic techniques in painful procedures (p < 0.0003), and also for the researchers who assumed that experiments inflicted pain and their classification of the degree of invasiveness (p < 0.0001), indicating their insufficient knowledge of these topics. Overall, 77% of institutions did not offer specific training to assess pain in experimental animals, and 24% of respondents had no training to work with animal experimentation. In total, 62% of the studies inflicted pain, 48% of respondents used pain scales, and the drugs administered most frequently for pain management were morphine (44%), meloxicam (43%) and tramadol (37%); 15% of respondents did not include analgesics even though their studies inflicted pain. Commonly used animals were rats (33%), mice (29%) and rabbits (8%). The results of this preliminary survey indicated that in Brazil there is a gap in the knowledge and training on pain assessment and management of experimental animals. Therefore, there is a necessity for an educational program to prepare and train scientists to assess and manage pain in laboratory or experimental animals. Further studies using a psychometrically validated survey instrument are warranted.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32698982
pii: S1467-2987(20)30104-5
doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2020.05.007
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Analgesics 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

647-656

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists and American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Rubia M Tomacheuski (RM)

Department of Anesthesiology, Medical School (FMB) of São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: rubia_mitalli@hotmail.com.

Marilda O Taffarel (MO)

Department of Veterinary Medicine, Maringá State University (UEM), Umuarama, PR, Brazil.

Marcos Ferrante (M)

Department of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Lavras (UFLA), Lavras, MG, Brazil.

Stelio Pl Luna (SP)

Department of Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH