Barriers and facilitators to uptake and retention of inner-city ethnically diverse women in a postnatal weight management intervention: a mixed-methods process evaluation within a feasibility trial in England.
health behaviour
maternal health
postpartum
weight management
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 07 2020
21 07 2020
Historique:
entrez:
24
7
2020
pubmed:
24
7
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To understand the barriers and facilitators to uptake and retention of postnatal women randomised to a commercial group weight management intervention using the COM-B (capability, opportunity, motivation and behaviour) behaviour change model. Concurrent mixed-methods (qualitative dominant) process evaluation nested within a feasibility randomised controlled trial, comprising questionnaires and interviews at 6 and 12 months postbirth. One National Health Service maternity unit in an inner city area in the south of England. 98 postnatal women with body mass indices>25 kg/m Twelve-week Slimming World (SW) commercial group weight management programme, commencing anytime from 8 to 16 weeks postnatally. Data regarding uptake and retention from questionnaires and interviews conducted 6 and 12 months postbirth analysed thematically and mapped to the COM-B model. Barriers to SW uptake mostly concerned opportunity issues (eg, lack of time or childcare support) though some women also lacked motivation, not feeling that weight reduction was a priority, and a few cited capability issues such as lacking confidence. Weight loss aspirations were also a key factor explaining retention, as were social opportunity issues, particularly in relation to factors such as the extent of group identity and relationship with the group consultant; and physical opportunity such as perceived support from and fit with family lifestyle. In addition, barriers relating to beliefs and expectations about the SW programme were identified, including concerns regarding compatibility with breastfeeding and importance of exercise. Women's understanding of the SW approach, and capability to implement into their lifestyles, appeared related to level of attendance (dose-response effect). Uptake and retention in commercial weight management programmes may be enhanced by applying behaviour change techniques to address the barriers impacting on women's perceived capability, motivation and opportunity to participate. ISRCTN39186148.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32699126
pii: bmjopen-2019-034747
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034747
pmc: PMC7375430
doi:
Banques de données
ISRCTN
['ISRCTN39186148']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e034747Investigateurs
Amanda Avery
(A)
Andy Healey
(A)
Nina Khazaededah
(N)
Sara McMullen
(S)
Eugene Oteng-Ntim
(E)
Bimpe Oki
(B)
Lucilla Poston
(L)
Paul Seed
(P)
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: AA (a member of the SWAN trial team), alongside her academic position at the University of Nottingham, also holds a consultancy position at Slimming World (Alfreton, UK). Neither AA nor Slimming World (Alfreton, UK) had access to the study data or were involved in data collection or analyses. DB was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South London (NIHR CLAHRC South London) at King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests in relation to this study.
Références
Diabet Med. 2018 Oct;35(10):1308-1319
pubmed: 29790594
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4):591-2
pubmed: 26070710
Implement Sci. 2018 Oct 22;13(1):130
pubmed: 30348165
BMC Med. 2014 Oct 13;12:201
pubmed: 25318013
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Aug;93(8):794-801
pubmed: 24834792
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Oct 11;17(1):351
pubmed: 29020931
Obes Rev. 2014 Jun;15(6):462-86
pubmed: 24629076
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 10;15:882
pubmed: 26359180
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015 Oct;3(10):767-77
pubmed: 26165396
Nurs Times. 2010 Aug 17-23;106(32):20-2
pubmed: 20879641
Lancet. 2017 Jun 3;389(10085):2214-2225
pubmed: 28478041
Obes Rev. 2013 Oct;14(10):792-805
pubmed: 23773448
BJOG. 2020 Apr;127(5):636-645
pubmed: 31808248
Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Fall;1(4):170-8
pubmed: 19173021
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015 Sep 7;1:32
pubmed: 27965810
Implement Sci. 2016 Nov 28;11(1):157
pubmed: 27894313
Women Birth. 2012 Dec;25(4):174-80
pubmed: 21930449
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 28;9(1):e024808
pubmed: 30696684
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Feb;67(1):132-8
pubmed: 10028217
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2011 Jan;2(1):43-8
pubmed: 21147458
Pediatr Res. 2011 Feb;69(2):175-80
pubmed: 21076366
BMJ. 2011 Nov 03;343:d6500
pubmed: 22053315
J Nutr. 2006 Jan;136(1):140-6
pubmed: 16365073
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Dec;106(6):1349-56
pubmed: 16319262
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 23;(7):CD005627
pubmed: 23881656
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547
Obes Rev. 2005 Feb;6(1):67-85
pubmed: 15655039
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 20;7(11):e018286
pubmed: 29162575