The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an integrated osteoporosis care programme for postmenopausal women in Flanders: study protocol of a quasi-experimental controlled design.
Integrated care
Postmenopausal osteoporosis
Primary care
Study protocol
Journal
Archives of osteoporosis
ISSN: 1862-3514
Titre abrégé: Arch Osteoporos
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101318988
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 07 2020
22 07 2020
Historique:
received:
10
02
2020
accepted:
24
06
2020
entrez:
24
7
2020
pubmed:
24
7
2020
medline:
11
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Osteoporosis causes high individual and societal burden, due to limited attention to fracture prevention. Integrated care for chronic conditions has shown to facilitate management of these conditions, improving clinical outcomes alongside quality of life and cost-effectiveness. This manuscript describes an integrated osteoporosis care programme that will be implemented in primary care. To provide a comprehensive description of a quasi-experimental study design in which a newly developed integrated osteoporosis care (IOC) programme for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PO) in primary care (PC) is implemented and will be compared with care as usual (CAU). A literature research was performed and expert meetings have been taking place, which has led to the development of a complex PC intervention based on framework for integrated people-centred health services (IPCHS). This manuscript describes the developmental process of the preclinical phase of a quasi-experimental real-world design and the interventions as a result of this process that will be implemented during the clinical phase, along with the evaluation that will take place alongside the clinical phase: An integrative approach for the management of PO in primary care was developed and will be implemented in greater region of Ghent (GRG), Belgium. The approach consists of a complex intervention targeting patients and PC stakeholders in osteoporosis care (e.g. general practitioners (GPs), physiotherapists, nurses, pharmacists). A comparison will be made with CAU using medication possession ratios (MPR) of included patients as primary outcome. These data will be obtained from the national health database. Secondary outcomes are physician outcomes, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). A cost-effectiveness evaluation will be performed if the programme appears to be effective in terms of MPR. ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT03970902.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32700114
doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-00776-7
pii: 10.1007/s11657-020-00776-7
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03970902']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM