Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Empagliflozin Versus Oral Semaglutide, in Addition to Metformin, for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in the UK.

Cost-effectiveness Costs and cost analysis Diabetes mellitus Empagliflozin GLP-1 receptor agonists Oral semaglutide SGLT-2 inhibitors Treatment intensification United Kingdom

Journal

Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders
ISSN: 1869-6953
Titre abrégé: Diabetes Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101539025

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 05 06 2020
pubmed: 24 7 2020
medline: 24 7 2020
entrez: 24 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

International guidelines recommend treatment with a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor or glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist for treatment intensification in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with progression on metformin. In the randomised, controlled, Peptide Innovation for Early Diabetes Treatment (PIONEER) 2 trial, the SGLT-2 inhibitor empagliflozin was compared with the GLP-1 receptor agonist oral semaglutide, in addition to metformin. The aim of the current study was to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin 25 mg versus oral semaglutide 14 mg, in addition to metformin, for T2DM patients in the UK. Analyses were conducted from the UK healthcare payer perspective, using the IQVIA Core Diabetes model, with a time horizon of 50 years. Patients received either empagliflozin or oral semaglutide, in addition to metformin, until Hba1c threshold of 7.5% (58 mmol/mol) was exceeded, following which treatment intensification with insulin glargine in addition to empagliflozin or oral semaglutide plus metformin was assumed. Baseline cohort characteristics and 52-week treatment effects were derived from the PIONEER 2 trial. Treatment effects of empagliflozin and GLP-1 receptor agonists on hospitalisation for heart failure (hHF) were based on the Empagliflozin Comparative Effectiveness and Safety (EMPRISE) real-world study. Utilities, treatment costs and costs of diabetes-related complications were obtained from published sources. Direct costs for empagliflozin plus metformin were considerably lower than those for oral semaglutide plus metformin (by more than GBP 6000). Compared with oral semaglutide plus metformin, empagliflozin plus metformin was a cost-effective treatment for T2DM patients in all scenarios tested. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed cost-effectiveness in > 95% of the iterations using a threshold of 20,000 GBP/QALY. Empagliflozin 25 mg is a cost-effective treatment option versus oral semaglutide 14 mg, when used in addition to metformin, for the treatment of T2DM patients in the UK.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32700188
doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00883-1
pii: 10.1007/s13300-020-00883-1
pmc: PMC7434815
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2041-2055

Références

Eur Endocrinol. 2019 Aug;15(2):67-69
pubmed: 31616495
Diabetologia. 2003 Jun;46(6):760-5
pubmed: 12774166
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(1):14-31
pubmed: 29263194
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Aug;20 Suppl 1:S5-26
pubmed: 15324513
Diabetes Care. 2020 Feb;43(2):487-493
pubmed: 31857443
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Aug;20 Suppl 1:S27-40
pubmed: 15324514
Qual Life Res. 2009 Dec;18(10):1293-9
pubmed: 19813103
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 May;4(5):411-9
pubmed: 27009625
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Jan;11(1):259-277
pubmed: 31833042
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Sep;24(9-a Suppl):S5-S13
pubmed: 30156443
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Dec 1;118(11):1774-1780
pubmed: 27666177
Lancet. 2019 Jan 5;393(10166):31-39
pubmed: 30424892
Value Health. 2017 Mar;20(3):357-371
pubmed: 28292480
Am J Med. 2013 Sep;126(9 Suppl 1):S38-48
pubmed: 23953078
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Apr;45(4):203-20
pubmed: 17474539
Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Apr 22;17(2):e84353
pubmed: 31372172
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jan 20;7(2):
pubmed: 29353233
Diabetes Care. 2009 Nov;32 Suppl 2:S151-6
pubmed: 19875543
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 29;381(9):841-851
pubmed: 31185157
Diabetes Care. 2019 Dec;42(12):2272-2281
pubmed: 31530666
Value Health. 2014 Sep;17(6):714-24
pubmed: 25236995
Adv Ther. 2008 Jun;25(6):567-84
pubmed: 18568451
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2117-28
pubmed: 26378978
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 Jun 8;17(1):83
pubmed: 29884191
Diabetes Care. 2005 Dec;28(12):2901-7
pubmed: 16306552
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Apr;15(2):237-248
pubmed: 28063135
Diabetes Metab. 2017 Dec;43(6):501-511
pubmed: 28754263
Diabet Med. 2016 Nov;33(11):1575-1581
pubmed: 26773733
Circulation. 2019 Jun 18;139(25):2822-2830
pubmed: 30955357

Auteurs

Mafalda Ramos (M)

Global HEOR/Real World Solutions, IQVIA, 2740-266, Porto Salvo, Portugal.

Michael H Cummings (MH)

Academic Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY, Hampshire, UK.

Anastasia Ustyugova (A)

Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, 55216, Ingelheim Am Rhein, Germany.

Syed I Raza (SI)

Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd., Bracknell, RG12 8YS, Berkshire, UK.

Shamika U de Silva (SU)

Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd., Bracknell, RG12 8YS, Berkshire, UK.

Mark Lamotte (M)

Global HEOR/Real World Solutions, IQVIA, 1930, Zaventem, Belgium. Mark.lamotte@iqvia.com.

Classifications MeSH