Extracellular Matrix Rigidity Modulates Human Cervical Smooth Muscle Contractility-New Insights into Premature Cervical Failure and Spontaneous Preterm Birth.
Cervix
Contractility
Extracellular matrix
Pregnancy
Premature cervical remodeling
Smooth muscle
Journal
Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)
ISSN: 1933-7205
Titre abrégé: Reprod Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101291249
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2021
01 2021
Historique:
received:
28
04
2020
accepted:
15
07
2020
pubmed:
24
7
2020
medline:
24
11
2021
entrez:
24
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB), a major cause of infant morbidity and mortality, must involve premature cervical softening/dilation for a preterm vaginal delivery to occur. Yet, the mechanism behind premature cervical softening/dilation in humans remains unclear. We previously reported the non-pregnant human cervix contains considerably more cervical smooth muscle cells (CSMC) than historically appreciated and the CSMC organization resembles a sphincter. We hypothesize that premature cervical dilation leading to sPTB may be due to (1) an inherent CSMC contractility defect resulting in sphincter failure and/or (2) altered cervical extracellular matrix (ECM) rigidity which influences CSMC contractility. To test these hypotheses, we utilized immunohistochemistry to confirm this CSMC phenotype persists in the human pregnant cervix and then assessed in vitro arrays of contractility (F:G actin ratios, PDMS pillar arrays) using primary CSMC from pregnant women with and without premature cervical failure (PCF). We show that CSMC from pregnant women with PCF do not have an inherent CSMC contractility defect but that CSMC exhibit decreased contractility when exposed to soft ECM. Given this finding, we used UPLC-ESI-MS/MS to evaluate collagen cross-link profiles in the cervical tissue from non-pregnant women with and without PCF and found that women with PCF have decreased collagen cross-link maturity ratios, which correlates to softer cervical tissue. These findings suggest having soft cervical ECM may lead to decreased CSMC contractile tone and a predisposition to sphincter laxity that contributes to sPTB. Further studies are needed to explore the interaction between cervical ECM properties and CSMC cellular behavior when investigating the pathophysiology of sPTB.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32700284
doi: 10.1007/s43032-020-00268-6
pii: 10.1007/s43032-020-00268-6
pmc: PMC9344974
mid: NIHMS1614228
doi:
Substances chimiques
Actins
0
Collagen
9007-34-5
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
237-251Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : K08 HD088758
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD082251
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL112626
Pays : United States
Références
Reprod Sci. 2011 Aug;18(8):737-42
pubmed: 21421896
Cell Struct Funct. 1997 Feb;22(1):103-16
pubmed: 9113396
Nat Phys. 2019 Jul;15(7):689-695
pubmed: 33790983
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998 Aug;79(2):199-204
pubmed: 9720841
Endocrinology. 2012 Jul;153(7):3493-503
pubmed: 22529214
Nat Commun. 2015 Feb 23;6:6333
pubmed: 25704457
Semin Perinatol. 2017 Nov;41(7):427-437
pubmed: 28826790
Proc Inst Med Chic. 1947 Jan 15;16(10):295
pubmed: 20287330
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009 May 15;382(4):697-703
pubmed: 19327344
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1954 Nov;68(5):1261-71
pubmed: 13207218
J Biomech. 2015 Jun 25;48(9):1533-40
pubmed: 25817474
Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Apr;71(4):563-7
pubmed: 3353047
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Mar;156(3):691-7
pubmed: 3826220
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Aug;96(8):984-990
pubmed: 28374904
Reprod Sci. 2018 Nov;25(11):1589-1600
pubmed: 29471754
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;212(2):244.e1-8
pubmed: 25108144
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010 Jul 30;8:92
pubmed: 20673361
Reprod Domest Anim. 2009 Apr;44(2):303-11
pubmed: 19323797
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995 Jun;49(3):277-81
pubmed: 9764866
J Cell Physiol. 2005 Jul;204(1):198-209
pubmed: 15669099
Acta Biomater. 2016 May;36:195-209
pubmed: 26961804
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2017 May;56(5):628-636
pubmed: 28118027
Biol Reprod. 2017 Jan 1;96(1):13-23
pubmed: 28395330
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Mar;26(1):7-13
pubmed: 6839572
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Oct 1;172(10):949-957
pubmed: 30105352
BJOG. 2001 May;108(5):533-8
pubmed: 11368141
Cell Tissue Res. 2019 Jun;376(3):443-456
pubmed: 30671632
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;203(3):259.e1-5
pubmed: 20816149
N Engl J Med. 1996 Feb 29;334(9):567-72
pubmed: 8569824
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;212(3):321.e1-8
pubmed: 25281365
Endocrinology. 2011 Mar;152(3):1036-46
pubmed: 21209014
J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1952 Dec;59(6):763-76
pubmed: 13000534
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996 Jul;67(1):41-5
pubmed: 8789748
Cardiovasc Res. 2012 Jul 15;95(2):215-22
pubmed: 22628449
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1991;31(4):204-7
pubmed: 1885088
Can Med Assoc J. 1942 Jan;46(1):19-22
pubmed: 20322317
Dev Cell. 2013 Dec 9;27(5):545-59
pubmed: 24331927
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Sep;29(18):2968-72
pubmed: 26594899
BJOG. 2018 Jun;125(7):812-818
pubmed: 29226548
Lancet. 1951 Feb 3;1(6649):250-3
pubmed: 14795835
Reproduction. 2012 Apr;143(4):429-38
pubmed: 22344465
Dev Cell. 2018 Feb 5;44(3):326-336.e3
pubmed: 29396114
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 May;106(5):446-52
pubmed: 10430195
J Mol Endocrinol. 2018 Jan;60(1):17-28
pubmed: 29259042
Semin Perinatol. 2009 Oct;33(5):300-7
pubmed: 19796726
Biol Reprod. 2011 May;84(5):1053-62
pubmed: 21248285
Acta Physiol Hung. 1988;71(4):497-502
pubmed: 3207037
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;215(4):478.e1-478.e11
pubmed: 27166013
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Apr 3;109(14):5328-33
pubmed: 22431603
Reproduction. 2007 Aug;134(2):327-40
pubmed: 17660242
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 14;9(11):e112391
pubmed: 25397407
Dev Growth Differ. 2013 Jun;55(5):591-605
pubmed: 23557080
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Apr;21(2):106-12
pubmed: 26776146