Association of Event-Free and Distant Recurrence-Free Survival With Individual-Level Pathologic Complete Response in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Stages 2 and 3 Breast Cancer: Three-Year Follow-up Analysis for the I-SPY2 Adaptively Randomized Clinical Trial.
Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ administration & dosage
Breast Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Bridged-Ring Compounds
/ administration & dosage
Cyclophosphamide
/ administration & dosage
Disease-Free Survival
Doxorubicin
/ administration & dosage
Female
Humans
Middle Aged
Neoadjuvant Therapy
/ adverse effects
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ drug therapy
Progression-Free Survival
Proportional Hazards Models
Receptor, ErbB-2
/ genetics
Taxoids
/ administration & dosage
Trastuzumab
/ administration & dosage
Treatment Outcome
Journal
JAMA oncology
ISSN: 2374-2445
Titre abrégé: JAMA Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101652861
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 09 2020
01 09 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
24
7
2020
medline:
7
2
2021
entrez:
24
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pathologic complete response (pCR) is a known prognostic biomarker for long-term outcomes. The I-SPY2 trial evaluated if the strength of this clinical association persists in the context of a phase 2 neoadjuvant platform trial. To evaluate the association of pCR with event-free survival (EFS) and pCR with distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) in subpopulations of women with high-risk operable breast cancer treated with standard therapy or one of several novel agents. Multicenter platform trial of women with operable clinical stage 2 or 3 breast cancer with no prior surgery or systemic therapy for breast cancer; primary tumors were 2.5 cm or larger. Women with tumors that were ERBB2 negative/hormone receptor (HR) positive with low 70-gene assay score were excluded. Participants were adaptively randomized to one of several different investigational regimens or control therapy within molecular subtypes from March 2010 through 2016. The analysis included participants with follow-up data available as of February 26, 2019. Standard-of-care neoadjuvant therapy consisting of taxane treatment with or without (as control) one of several investigational agents or combinations followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Pathologic complete response and 3-year EFS and DRFS. Of the 950 participants (median [range] age, 49 [23-77] years), 330 (34.7%) achieved pCR. Three-year EFS and DRFS for patients who achieved pCR were both 95%. Hazard ratios for pCR vs non-pCR were 0.19 for EFS (95% CI, 0.12-0.31) and 0.21 for DRFS (95% CI, 0.13-0.34) and were similar across molecular subtypes, varying from 0.14 to 0.18 for EFS and 0.10 to 0.20 for DRFS. The 3-year outcomes from the I-SPY2 trial show that, regardless of subtype and/or treatment regimen, including 9 novel therapeutic combinations, achieving pCR after neoadjuvant therapy implies approximately an 80% reduction in recurrence rate. The goal of the I-SPY2 trial is to rapidly identify investigational therapies that may improve pCR when validated in a phase 3 confirmatory trial. Whether pCR is a validated surrogate in the sense that a therapy that improves pCR rate can be assumed to also improve long-term outcome requires further study. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01042379.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32701140
pii: 2768226
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.2535
pmc: PMC7378873
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bridged-Ring Compounds
0
Taxoids
0
taxane
1605-68-1
Doxorubicin
80168379AG
Cyclophosphamide
8N3DW7272P
ERBB2 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
Trastuzumab
P188ANX8CK
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01042379']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1355-1362Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA013148
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA016672
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Dec;5(6):649-55
pubmed: 7165009
Nature. 2002 Jan 31;415(6871):530-6
pubmed: 11823860
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Apr;19(4):497-509
pubmed: 29501363
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 25;375(8):717-29
pubmed: 27557300
J Clin Oncol. 2006 May 1;24(13):2019-27
pubmed: 16606972
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Oct 1;25(28):4414-22
pubmed: 17785706
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 14;380(7):617-628
pubmed: 30516102
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 7;375(1):11-22
pubmed: 27406346
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2019 Jun 14;5:17
pubmed: 31240240
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr 1;38(10):1059-1069
pubmed: 32031889
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Jul;86(1):97-100
pubmed: 19440188
Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 01;28(8):1817-1824
pubmed: 28459938
JAMA Oncol. 2020 May 1;6(5):676-684
pubmed: 32053137
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Jul 15;20(14):3632-6
pubmed: 24748554
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 7;375(1):23-34
pubmed: 27406347
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Aug;16(8):2672-85
pubmed: 9704717
Ann Oncol. 2020 May;31(5):569-581
pubmed: 32278621
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Jun 15;26(12):2838-2848
pubmed: 32046998
Lancet. 2014 Jul 12;384(9938):164-72
pubmed: 24529560
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Sep 6;98(17):1183-92
pubmed: 16954471
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Sep 10;30(26):3242-9
pubmed: 22649152
N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 19;347(25):1999-2009
pubmed: 12490681
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 1;376(22):2147-2159
pubmed: 28564564