The Impact of Coronary Physiology on Contemporary Clinical Decision Making.
Cardiac Catheterization
Clinical Decision-Making
Computed Tomography Angiography
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Artery Disease
/ diagnosis
Coronary Vessels
/ diagnostic imaging
Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
Humans
Hyperemia
/ physiopathology
Microcirculation
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
angiography-derived FFR
computed tomography–derived fractional flow reserve
coronary microvascular disease
fractional flow reserve
instantaneous wave-free ratio
nonhyperemic pressure ratio
Journal
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
ISSN: 1876-7605
Titre abrégé: JACC Cardiovasc Interv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101467004
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 07 2020
27 07 2020
Historique:
received:
09
03
2020
revised:
13
04
2020
accepted:
21
04
2020
entrez:
25
7
2020
pubmed:
25
7
2020
medline:
20
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) has become one of the cornerstones of decision making for myocardial revascularization, with a large body of evidence supporting the benefits of using fractional flow reserve and other pressure-based indexes for functional assessment of coronary stenoses. Furthermore, physiology allows the identification of specific vascular dysfunction mechanisms in patients without obstructive CAD. Currently, more than 10 modalities of functional coronary assessment are available, although the overall adoption of these physiological tools, of either intracoronary or image-based nature, is still low. In this paper the authors review these modalities of functional coronary assessment according to their timing of use: outside the catheterization laboratory, in the catheterization laboratory prior to the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and in the catheterization laboratory during or after PCI. The authors discuss how the information obtained can be used in setting the indication for PCI, in planning and guiding the procedure, and in documenting the final functional result of the intervention. The advantages and limitations of each modality in each setting are discussed. Furthermore, the key value of intracoronary physiology in diagnosing mechanisms of microcirculatory dysfunction, which account for the presence of ischemia in many patients without obstructive CAD, is revisited. On the basis of the opportunities generated by the multiplicity of diagnostic tools described, the authors propose an algorithmic approach to physiological coronary investigations in clinical practice, with the key aims of: 1) avoiding unneeded revascularization procedures; 2) improving procedural PCI and long-term outcomes in patients with obstructive CAD; and 3) diagnosing vascular dysfunction mechanisms that can be effectively treated in patients with NOCAD. The authors believe that such structured approach may also contribute to the wider adoption of available technologies for functional assessment of patients with CAD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32703589
pii: S1936-8798(20)31029-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.040
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1617-1638Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.